Can Sir Keir Starmer revive the Labour Party?

Can Sir Keir Starmer revive the Labour Party?

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

768

13,682 posts

96 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Something darkly comical about how messed up politics is in this country when the bloke who isn't in charge is getting more scrutiny from the media and the public for not being in charge than the bloke who actually is in charge seems to get.

We're so fked hehe
Take the blinkers off. Rightly or wrongly someone's kicking Boris every day, Starmer barely gets a mention until he's allowed down the pub, or on a knee, or behind a wheel.

Sway

26,278 posts

194 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
98elise said:
Slightly OT, but the Christian Bakers were not being homophobic.The Supreme Court rightly sided with the Bakers in that it was the message on the cake they objected to, not the sexually of the activists/customer.
Fair enough, to be honest I didn't pay too much attention to it. Everyone involved seemed to be trying to be the bigger arse.

bitchstewie

51,264 posts

210 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
Sway said:
Well, I don't think I've seen any examples of Johnson having his goons assaulting someone on their own premises. Or at all...

I do see a lot of scrutiny about Johnson though, I hear far more about him and his failings than I hear at all about Starmer.
Apparently Starmer had been invited by the pubs co-owner.

Not sure he's too impressed with Rod hehe


Sway

26,278 posts

194 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Sway said:
Well, I don't think I've seen any examples of Johnson having his goons assaulting someone on their own premises. Or at all...

I do see a lot of scrutiny about Johnson though, I hear far more about him and his failings than I hear at all about Starmer.
Apparently Starmer had been invited by the pubs co-owner.

Not sure he's too impressed with Rod hehe

That's pretty much irrelevant.

If they're co-owners, then it's the licensee on the premises who has absolute control.

Still doesn't permit Tommy Robinson style goons to start manhandling and shoving down stairs, does it?

bitchstewie

51,264 posts

210 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
Agreed that part of it looks terrible.

swisstoni

17,010 posts

279 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
Feel sorry for Starmer on this one.

Sway

26,278 posts

194 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
Feel sorry for Starmer on this one.
Why?

If he can't cope with an angry member of the electorate without:

Getting the goon squad to physically assault them

Sneering about not being lectured to by the likes of him

Having a sarky twitter response suggesting the only form of public input should be at the ballot box


Then he really shouldn't be in his position, and it certainly doesn't scan with the 'legal prosecutor super operator' image he likes to portray...

swisstoni

17,010 posts

279 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
Sway said:
swisstoni said:
Feel sorry for Starmer on this one.
Why?

If he can't cope with an angry member of the electorate without:

Getting the goon squad to physically assault them

Sneering about not being lectured to by the likes of him

Having a sarky twitter response suggesting the only form of public input should be at the ballot box


Then he really shouldn't be in his position, and it certainly doesn't scan with the 'legal prosecutor super operator' image he likes to portray...
Because he ran in to a grandstanding tosser.

markyb_lcy

9,904 posts

62 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
Because he ran in to a grandstanding tosser.
And he's *not* a grandstanding tosser himself?

Actually, you're right. People want him to be a grandstanding tosser, but evidently, he's just a tosser.

Sway

26,278 posts

194 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
markyb_lcy said:
swisstoni said:
Because he ran in to a grandstanding tosser.
And he's *not* a grandstanding tosser himself?

Actually, you're right. People want him to be a grandstanding tosser, but evidently, he's just a tosser.
hehe

Clifford Chambers

27,029 posts

183 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
Oi Shakespeare your bard.

otolith

56,148 posts

204 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
markyb_lcy said:
otolith said:
Presumably the landlord's desire that the Labour opposition opposes anything the government does would have had him furious at Clement Attlee for not backing Hitler.
Are we talking pre, or post appeasement here?
Both, presumably, if one believes an opposition must robotically oppose on principle.

swisstoni

17,010 posts

279 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
otolith said:
markyb_lcy said:
otolith said:
Presumably the landlord's desire that the Labour opposition opposes anything the government does would have had him furious at Clement Attlee for not backing Hitler.
Are we talking pre, or post appeasement here?
Both, presumably, if one believes an opposition must robotically oppose on principle.
We’d still be locked up to buggery if we were following a lot of Labour rank and file preferences.

colin_p

4,503 posts

212 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
Love it when the left eats itself or one of its own.


dudleybloke

19,837 posts

186 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
That goon is his official security, Boris's security wore the same suits when he came to Dudley.
The landlord should have just phoned the police and said someone is refusing to leave.
Then if part of a pub-watch scheme ban him from every pub in the town.

markyb_lcy

9,904 posts

62 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
otolith said:
markyb_lcy said:
otolith said:
Presumably the landlord's desire that the Labour opposition opposes anything the government does would have had him furious at Clement Attlee for not backing Hitler.
Are we talking pre, or post appeasement here?
Both, presumably, if one believes an opposition must robotically oppose on principle.
Good answer.

Forgive me, I was being as facetious as I had put you down to have been.

BabySharkDooDooDooDooDooDoo

15,077 posts

169 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
eliot said:
No doubt SKS mumbled "bigoted man" under his breath as he walked away.

Men In Blue - just waiting to zap him with their flashy thing..


Edited by eliot on Monday 19th April 15:19
Chap in the middle looks like my 14 year old cousin posing for a selfie with those duck lips hehe

williamp

19,261 posts

273 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
I cant seem to find a whole incident. Did it start with the arguing outside, starmer run away into the pub, only for the bloke to follow as its his pub, where he was manyandledmby security down a stairwell allowing Sir kier to escape???

Tony427

2,873 posts

233 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
The thing is the Landlord is correct in stating that Starmers refusal to hold the govt to account has killed many people.

4.7 million delays to hosipital treatments and huge queues for surgery to alleviate life threatening conditions will undoubtedly kill more people than Covid 19.

Yet Starmer, the forensic genius, won't be talked to by the likes of him.

Boris must be laughing himself silly. I wonder if there will be a witty quip next PMQ's ?

Boris needs to go, but Starmer is making him look good. We're doomed.


Sway

26,278 posts

194 months

Monday 19th April 2021
quotequote all
Yeah, the 'likes of you' comment really is telling...

It's the same as Brown's 'terrible, bigoted woman' (or whatever it was he said).

Just shows complete contempt for normal people, and their views.

Amusingly, that's being presented as the position of Prince Phillip cause there were no members of the public or government at his funeral... Yet silence on here, and even sympathy for the knob.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED