Discussion
BadBull said:
Do you agree with her actions?
Maybe she was just protesting at her local environment being vandalised with communist support murals??BadBull said:
Do you agree with her dislike of equality?
Thats a fair old jump, we dont know her motives were anything of the sort.BadBull said:
Do think it was a sensible thing to do?
It obviously seemed so to her, much in the way that seattles anarchist one seemed a good idea to their mayor.Maybe she was just sick of having something shoved in her face every day and had enough of it. Who knows, ask her.
BadBull said:
Standard internet response. Yawn.
My questions were clearly directed at noodle who posted the link.
I've no interest in your opinion or those of other banned returnee agitators... And as such I won't respond to you further.
HTH.xxx
As I and others think you're both banned returnee posters I find this interaction between the two of you mildly amusing. My questions were clearly directed at noodle who posted the link.
I've no interest in your opinion or those of other banned returnee agitators... And as such I won't respond to you further.
HTH.xxx
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
As I and others think you're both banned returnee posters I find this interaction between the two of you mildly amusing.
Heeeeeeyy! Hang on a minute! Are you now saying Im NOT TB? I didnt get the memo!
Subtle shift in position from the gadgey fella......
Gadgetmac said:
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
As I and others think you're both banned returnee posters I find this interaction between the two of you mildly amusing.
Heeeeeeyy! Hang on a minute! Are you now saying Im NOT TB? I didnt get the memo!
Subtle shift in position from the gadgey fella......
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
As I and others think you're both banned returnee posters I find this interaction between the two of you mildly amusing.
Heeeeeeyy! Hang on a minute! Are you now saying Im NOT TB? I didnt get the memo!
Subtle shift in position from the gadgey fella......
Already nearly 100 shootings in New York this month, every single victim is a member of a minority group, as were 97% of June's.
https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/128024501571...
https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/128024501571...
A Winner Is You said:
Already nearly 100 shootings in New York this month, every single victim is a member of a minority group, as were 97% of June's.
https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/128024501571...
This is indeed true, but to follow BLM logic, it’s racist to blame minority groups for shooting each other. The correct way to deal with this is to shoot more white people.https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/128024501571...
This is in the same vein as Harvard actually biasing against (And limiting the number of ) Asian Americans as they are too good at maths and as such are not leaving space for other minorities who as not quite as good as them.
Liokault said:
This is in the same vein as Harvard actually biasing against (And limiting the number of ) Asian Americans as they are too good at maths and as such are not leaving space for other minorities who as not quite as good as them.
Holding individuals back because of their immutable characteristics is vile, no matter the scenario.Gadgetmac said:
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
As I and others think you're both banned returnee posters I find this interaction between the two of you mildly amusing.
Heeeeeeyy! Hang on a minute! Are you now saying Im NOT TB? I didnt get the memo!
Subtle shift in position from the gadgey fella......
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
Dont Panic said:
Gadgetmac said:
As I and others think you're both banned returnee posters I find this interaction between the two of you mildly amusing.
Heeeeeeyy! Hang on a minute! Are you now saying Im NOT TB? I didnt get the memo!
Subtle shift in position from the gadgey fella......
Liokault said:
A Winner Is You said:
Already nearly 100 shootings in New York this month, every single victim is a member of a minority group, as were 97% of June's.
https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/128024501571...
This is indeed true, but to follow BLM logic, it’s racist to blame minority groups for shooting each other. The correct way to deal with this is to shoot more white people.https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/128024501571...
This is in the same vein as Harvard actually biasing against (And limiting the number of ) Asian Americans as they are too good at maths and as such are not leaving space for other minorities who as not quite as good as them.
As for the comment on Harvard, i would suggest you read more than the headlines next time, Currently Asian Americans have been allocated over 22% of all placements, with Hispanic and African Americans assigned only 12-15% combined. Their argument against increasing the Asian-American allocation further is that it would detract from other groups.
VeeDubBigBird said:
As for the comment on Harvard, i would suggest you read more than the headlines next time, Currently Asian Americans have been allocated over 22% of all placements, with Hispanic and African Americans assigned only 12-15% combined. Their argument against increasing the Asian-American allocation further is that it would detract from other groups.
Why is that a problem? Sorry Dave, but we've got too many people here that look like you. So we're giving your spot to Bob, who couldn't match your scores but does look different.That's bad enough, imagine effectively being told "You see, you're a minority, so you're going to get a bunch of bullst in your life specifically for that reason. Also, your group is too good at academia, so we're gonna st on you for that. In some respects, you're not good enough. In some, you're too good. The only constant is never. ever. forget. that. you're. different.
Doesn't seem very egalitarian to me.
VeeDubBigBird said:
As for the comment on Harvard, i would suggest you read more than the headlines next time, Currently Asian Americans have been allocated over 22% of all placements, with Hispanic and African Americans assigned only 12-15% combined. Their argument against increasing the Asian-American allocation further is that it would detract from other groups.
It would be more accurate to say they have been RESTRICTED to 22%amusingduck said:
VeeDubBigBird said:
As for the comment on Harvard, i would suggest you read more than the headlines next time, Currently Asian Americans have been allocated over 22% of all placements, with Hispanic and African Americans assigned only 12-15% combined. Their argument against increasing the Asian-American allocation further is that it would detract from other groups.
Why is that a problem? Sorry Dave, but we've got too many people here that look like you. So we're giving your spot to Bob, who couldn't match your scores but does look different.That's bad enough, imagine effectively being told "You see, you're a minority, so you're going to get a bunch of bullst in your life specifically for that reason. Also, your group is too good at academia, so we're gonna st on you for that. In some respects, you're not good enough. In some, you're too good. The only constant is never. ever. forget. that. you're. different.
Doesn't seem very egalitarian to me.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff