Marcus Rashford - School Meals Vouchers Campaign

Marcus Rashford - School Meals Vouchers Campaign

Author
Discussion

Legacywr

12,134 posts

188 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Digga said:
Agreed. This being my point.

Buying a dog which has had it's ears cropped is very different from buying one and requesting the operation.

I do also feel that for working dogs, which properly trained guard dogs most definitely are, there is an argument for safety/welfare of the dog in worst case scenario, for docking tails and ears. This for very, very specific cases and only with controls and not for the average chav-on-the-street.
What?

Short Grain

2,760 posts

220 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
Digga said:
Agreed. This being my point.

Buying a dog which has had it's ears cropped is very different from buying one and requesting the operation.

I do also feel that for working dogs, which properly trained guard dogs most definitely are, there is an argument for safety/welfare of the dog in worst case scenario, for docking tails and ears. This for very, very specific cases and only with controls and not for the average chav-on-the-street.
What?
WTAF! Are you seriously advocating mutilating a dogs ears to make it look more 'suitable' for its job! A practise that leaves the dog suspectable to health problems, with its ears, as they are no longer able to shield their inner ear to blasts of cold, dust and debris, and even rain, because the ears are cropped open?!








Digga

40,324 posts

283 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Short Grain said:
Legacywr said:
Digga said:
Agreed. This being my point.

Buying a dog which has had it's ears cropped is very different from buying one and requesting the operation.

I do also feel that for working dogs, which properly trained guard dogs most definitely are, there is an argument for safety/welfare of the dog in worst case scenario, for docking tails and ears. This for very, very specific cases and only with controls and not for the average chav-on-the-street.
What?
WTAF! Are you seriously advocating mutilating a dogs ears to make it look more 'suitable' for its job! A practise that leaves the dog suspectable to health problems, with its ears, as they are no longer able to shield their inner ear to blasts of cold, dust and debris, and even rain, because the ears are cropped open?!
Not saying I would want either, but Animal Welfare Act 2006 banned tail docking and cropping in England and Wales other than for medical reasons and with some exemptions for working dogs.

Short Grain

2,760 posts

220 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Digga said:
ot saying I would want either, but Animal Welfare Act 2006 banned tail docking and cropping in England and Wales other than for medical reasons and with some exemptions for working dogs.
Ah, Sorry Digga, misread and reacted!

Just had a quick look at the report. Medical / injury I can understand but I can't see how cutting it's tail off or cropping its ears could help in any working environment, other than fighting!! And for that I would advocate cropping of parts of the 'owner' furious

Evanivitch

20,079 posts

122 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Digga said:
I do also feel that for working dogs, which properly trained guard dogs most definitely are, there is an argument for safety/welfare of the dog in worst case scenario, for docking tails and ears. This for very, very specific cases and only with controls and not for the average chav-on-the-street.
Except this isn't a working dog. He doesn't treat it like a working dog, he treats it like a pet. It's just a big pet dog which has been trained to be aggressive when required.

And whilst I agree entirely it's probably an issue he's completely ignorant of, what it does do is perpetuate a desirable trend amongst the idiots that use football players for trends in culture status.

Digga

40,324 posts

283 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
Digga said:
I do also feel that for working dogs, which properly trained guard dogs most definitely are, there is an argument for safety/welfare of the dog in worst case scenario, for docking tails and ears. This for very, very specific cases and only with controls and not for the average chav-on-the-street.
Except this isn't a working dog. He doesn't treat it like a working dog, he treats it like a pet. It's just a big pet dog which has been trained to be aggressive when required.

And whilst I agree entirely it's probably an issue he's completely ignorant of, what it does do is perpetuate a desirable trend amongst the idiots that use football players for trends in culture status.
A well-trained personal security dog is fine with owner and family. They can be petted, to a degree, but to strangers they are very different.

When I was a kid, my mate's family had an Alsatian that had been trained. It used to be lose in the grounds of the house sometimes. There was a sort of gatehouse, with vehicle and pedestrian gate and a postbox, so postie didn't have to run the gauntlet. If the gates were shut, I knew I had a very short time to make the dash to the safety of the porch. If they weren't in I was stick in the porch with the dog outside going mad. hehe


Evanivitch

20,079 posts

122 months

Thursday 16th December 2021
quotequote all
Digga said:
A well-trained personal security dog is fine with owner and family. They can be petted, to a degree, but to strangers they are very different.

When I was a kid, my mate's family had an Alsatian that had been trained. It used to be lose in the grounds of the house sometimes. There was a sort of gatehouse, with vehicle and pedestrian gate and a postbox, so postie didn't have to run the gauntlet. If the gates were shut, I knew I had a very short time to make the dash to the safety of the porch. If they weren't in I was stick in the porch with the dog outside going mad. hehe
He takes the pet dogs for walks and kickaround in the park...

You're not doing that with an trained protection dog. Kid runs over for an autograph and he's going to have issues.

Murph7355

37,716 posts

256 months

Thursday 16th December 2021
quotequote all
jimothyc said:
Whether purchased or carried out in ignorance or not. By putting this poor dog all over his Instagram, he's created an instant demand for similarly mutilated dogs.

Perhaps he should get his PR agency to launch a campaign on his behalf to campaign against this abhorrent practice. It seems to be something that's well within his normal scope of operations to arrange.

The initial ignorance I can forgive. But surely he's not ignorant of the issues now or of the effect his actions have had on the problem?
Indeed...

bitchstewie

Original Poster:

51,232 posts

210 months

Tuesday 31st May 2022
quotequote all
I wonder if he'll come out of retirement scratchchin

Give more pupils free school meals, teachers in England say

Murph7355

37,716 posts

256 months

Tuesday 31st May 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
I wonder if he'll come out of retirement scratchchin

Give more pupils free school meals, teachers in England say
Who, Rashford? When did he retire?

Was it when child hunger was solved last summer?

petemurphy

10,124 posts

183 months

Tuesday 31st May 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
I wonder if he'll come out of retirement scratchchin

Give more pupils free school meals, teachers in England say
Good idea cut teachers wages to pay for it.

Oh is that not what the teachers say?

bitchstewie

Original Poster:

51,232 posts

210 months

Tuesday 31st May 2022
quotequote all
Very insightful Pete.

Bless your kind heart hehe

Lucas CAV

3,022 posts

219 months

Tuesday 31st May 2022
quotequote all
There are some (note, not all) pistonheaders who would benefit from stepping outside their comfortable "PH private" bubble once in a while.

petemurphy

10,124 posts

183 months

Tuesday 31st May 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Very insightful Pete.

Bless your kind heart hehe
wink

Countdown

39,899 posts

196 months

Tuesday 31st May 2022
quotequote all
Lucas CAV said:
There are some (note, not all) pistonheaders who would benefit from stepping outside their comfortable "PH private" bubble once in a while.
Now waiting for 17 different version of the Four Yorkshiremen story......

mike74

3,687 posts

132 months

Wednesday 1st June 2022
quotequote all
Lucas CAV said:
There are some (note, not all) pistonheaders who would benefit from stepping outside their comfortable "PH private" bubble once in a while.
Fully agree.

Some pistonheaders really need to educate themselves as to just how profligate and generous the benefits system can be for those who know how to take full advantage of it i.e. having kids you can't afford and then choosing to only work minimal part time hours even when full time hours are available in order to claim optimum "in work" benefits.

bitchstewie

Original Poster:

51,232 posts

210 months

Randy Winkman

16,137 posts

189 months

Wednesday 6th July 2022
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Yes - good for him. smile

bitchstewie

Original Poster:

51,232 posts

210 months

Sunday 28th August 2022
quotequote all

Simes205

4,539 posts

228 months

Sunday 28th August 2022
quotequote all
Pupils who are eligible for FSM parents earn less than 7.4K, that is not a wage.
Until 2016 the cut off was 16.1k