CV19 - Cure worse than the disease? (Vol 3)

CV19 - Cure worse than the disease? (Vol 3)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
sambucket said:
That sounds a little bit grim! Glad you are getting treatment.
beer
It's a nasty little fker, it took five years to get it all out. I need an annual MRI for the next few years to check it hasn't recurred.

So thanks to lockdown I've not been getting treatment, you can probably understand why I'm firmly in the 'cure is worse than the disease' camp.

Fatality risk to me from Covid 0.001%

Fatality risk to me if my condition was left completely untreated 75%. (yup, 3/4)

I'm not unique, there are thousands of people who are at no risk from Covid who are currently not getting treatment for conditions that are far more likely to harm them.

That can't be right can it?

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
Elysium said:
Are you asking me or making a statement?

Sweden demonstrates that this is untrue. They are managing COVID comfortably with minimal interventions.

You have already admitted that you don’t know if your preferred alternative is better.
Which is a compliment in most scientific circles.

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
[redacted]

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
[redacted]

Elysium

13,854 posts

188 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
[redacted]

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
Behold the solution to a crisis, rooted in shortage of healthcare. Increase healthcare.

Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 8th July 21:13

Vanden Saab

14,154 posts

75 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
Dr Z said:
RTB said:
RSTurboPaul said:
Not sure if this is posted already but Lancet reporting 5.2% prevalence in testing, framed (of course rolleyes ) as 'herd immunity is impossible without a vaccine':
https://twitter.com/i/events/1280194458722562049?s...

I don't understand how they can frame it in that way. If many (most?) are asymptomatic and have no detectable antibodies after catching the actual live virus, surely they will see the exact same outcome after receiving a shot of dead virus in a vaccination? In which case, why do we need a vaccine??
Vaccines generally do a much better job of eliciting an immune response than the pathogen they mimic. Usually through the addition of adjuvants to prime the immune system or through directly engineering the antigen or through specific dosing regimens. If I wanted long term immunity to SARS-CoV2 I'd go for a vaccine over infection.

Suffice to say that if 30-40% of those vaccinated show no response to a vaccine and another similarly large percentage only show a very weak non protective response then it won't get approved anyway.
This. Herd immunity by natural infection is a stupid idea, and should be treated with all the contempt one can muster.
May be... I found this which is interesting... https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunit...

ONS said:
As of 29 June 2020, 6.3% (95% confidence interval: 4.7% to 8.1%) of individuals from whom blood samples were taken tested positive for antibodies to the coronavirus (COVID-19); this equates to 1 in 16 people, or 2.8 million people, in England. Note that blood samples are taken only from those aged 16 years and over.
That is household data, so nobody under 16 or anyone who is in a hospital, care home or similar institution. So many who will have or had it are not in the survey. We know some people do not catch it at all and that some catch it but do not produce anti-bodies. The data is also two or three weeks behind as it takes that long for anti-bodies to develop. Depending on the numbers in the immune and had it but no anti-body group we could be well above 20% who have had the virus already.


Edited by Vanden Saab on Wednesday 8th July 21:21

isaldiri

18,623 posts

169 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
TheJimi said:
sambucket said:
The higher the cases we go in with,the higher the chance of lockdown measures? The lower cases the better chance we can TTI and maintain normality.
I would agree with that logic.
'New normal' or actual normality as defined by life pre march? I agree we can control and track cases much better with a low starting point. The issue is how long are we then supposed to maintain our life being in fear of the virus..masks everywhere, businessesall on tenterhooks of being shutdown.? There is no obvious end point to case suppression - that's my primary issue with it.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
'New normal' or actual normality as defined by life pre march? I agree we can control and track cases much better with a low starting point. The issue is how long are we then supposed to maintain our life being in fear of the virus...? There is no obvious end point to case suppression - that's my primary issue with it.
Whitty was asked this in the last press conference and he waffled but basically said spring. Followed by Boris doing his bit, talking about cricket.

I’ll try and find it

https://youtu.be/ifpIWWxqQis?t=2697

Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 8th July 21:55

lemmingjames

7,462 posts

205 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
sambucket said:
My idealistic plan is to shut borders and hunker down for the winter but I don’t have the knowledge or data to know it’s best.
you mean like New Zealand? i guess you could throw Australia into the mix on that as well.

monkfish1

11,113 posts

225 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
[redacted]

pneumothorax

1,312 posts

232 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
[redacted]

isaldiri

18,623 posts

169 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
[redacted]

grumbledoak

31,551 posts

234 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
Or it's starting to look that way the way the world has gone nuts... biggrin
If the world has gone nuts, maybe he is the right man for the job? biggrin


pneumothorax

1,312 posts

232 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
monkfish1 said:
You missed a public information campaign. Without that, the rest is useless. Millions are scared to death.
Yes, the elderly folk I see are literally petrified re COVID. They are avoiding hospital treatment at all costs, even when they have obvious life threatening conditions, happy to ride them out.

The media have really not helped in this

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
pneumothorax said:
Yes, the elderly folk I see are literally petrified re COVID. They are avoiding hospital treatment at all costs, even when they have obvious life threatening conditions, happy to ride them out.

The media have really not helped in this
“Literally petrified”? You mean that they have genuinely turned to stone? Or are they merely in a state of complete paralysis?

I’d say they have bigger things than covid to worry about in either case.

TheJimi

25,018 posts

244 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
BlackWidow13 said:
pneumothorax said:
Yes, the elderly folk I see are literally petrified re COVID. They are avoiding hospital treatment at all costs, even when they have obvious life threatening conditions, happy to ride them out.

The media have really not helped in this
“Literally petrified”? You mean that they have genuinely turned to stone? Or are they merely in a state of complete paralysis?

I’d say they have bigger things than covid to worry about in either case.
What is wrong with you?

pneumothorax

1,312 posts

232 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
BlackWidow13 said:
“Literally petrified”? You mean that they have genuinely turned to stone? Or are they merely in a state of complete paralysis?

I’d say they have bigger things than covid to worry about in either case.
scared stless

RSTurboPaul

10,430 posts

259 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
BlackWidow13 said:
pneumothorax said:
Yes, the elderly folk I see are literally petrified re COVID. They are avoiding hospital treatment at all costs, even when they have obvious life threatening conditions, happy to ride them out.

The media have really not helped in this
“Literally petrified”? You mean that they have genuinely turned to stone? Or are they merely in a state of complete paralysis?

I’d say they have bigger things than covid to worry about in either case.
rofl

pneumothorax

1,312 posts

232 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
blackwidow

No, you are correct, none of my Patients have been petrified

They are however ignoring medical advice about life threatening situations, and it bothers me. In fact it often vexes me.

They have consumed a narrative that describes almost certain death in hospital if they go there, and it is almost impossible to get them to consider an alternative approach, ie something sensible, like modern medicine.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED