Discussion
This is what happens when ill informed people latch on to the spoon fed nonsense of the MSM.
An "Anon" is an individual, "Q" is a board (One of many) where links are posted up to be discussed.
The number one rule of that board is "Do your own research".
There is not now, or ever has been a qanon except in the many attacks by the MSM.
An "Anon" is an individual, "Q" is a board (One of many) where links are posted up to be discussed.
The number one rule of that board is "Do your own research".
There is not now, or ever has been a qanon except in the many attacks by the MSM.
Countdown said:
I'm a simple bloke and that's perhaps why I can't see the issue. If i want to go to a Pub and 'Spoons is the only one available I'll make sure I do my damndest not to get banned. Their gaff, their rules. In a way it's the same as having a driving license and ending up banned for breaching various driving laws.
I think it'd be a bit more like the roads being a privately owned monopoly, where your ability to drive can be effectively removed despite not having broken any laws, and having no route to redress.dasigty said:
This is what happens when ill informed people latch on to the spoon fed nonsense of the MSM.
An "Anon" is an individual, "Q" is a board (One of many) where links are posted up to be discussed.
The number one rule of that board is "Do your own research".
There is not now, or ever has been a qanon except in the many attacks by the MSM.
dO yOuR oWn ReSeArChAn "Anon" is an individual, "Q" is a board (One of many) where links are posted up to be discussed.
The number one rule of that board is "Do your own research".
There is not now, or ever has been a qanon except in the many attacks by the MSM.
The warcry of the internet conspiracist.
So here's the thing dashiggity, if what you were presenting was concrete and self evidently true, there'd be no reason for people to dO tHeIr OwN rEsEaRcH because they'd be persuaded.
Do your own research is one of those things that plays right into the Trump/Bannon(also Putin/Surkov btw) media strategy of filling the interwebs with sh-te.
People get so caught up mopping up the sh-te they can't find the thread of reality.
Byker28i said:
dasigty said:
Byker28i said:
Some of the emails are real, hacked from his iCloud account and added to give authenticy to the faked ones. trumps DNI has said it's not Russian disinformation, but many other people have said it is, including those beneath the DNI and the investigation is ongoing.
Remember Ratcliffe has been trying to assist trumps reelection by releasing extracts, snippets and documents taken out of context pertaining to the trump/russia investigation.
It's all timed to have the same effect as the Comey letter, but so far is falling flat, just like every other attempt team trump has made to manufacture dirt on Biden. Remember trump was impeached for hsi efforts to manufacture dirt.
trump also needs a distraction from the NY times reporting on his tax evasion and hidden chinese bank accounts, the Maxwell/Epstein testimony about to come out, the two court cases based on trumps sexual assault, the investigation into his business... etc
Evidence of any of the claims above ?Remember Ratcliffe has been trying to assist trumps reelection by releasing extracts, snippets and documents taken out of context pertaining to the trump/russia investigation.
It's all timed to have the same effect as the Comey letter, but so far is falling flat, just like every other attempt team trump has made to manufacture dirt on Biden. Remember trump was impeached for hsi efforts to manufacture dirt.
trump also needs a distraction from the NY times reporting on his tax evasion and hidden chinese bank accounts, the Maxwell/Epstein testimony about to come out, the two court cases based on trumps sexual assault, the investigation into his business... etc
Where do you get your info from? You make some amazing claims yet never back it up with any evidence. just what are the sources you are reading?
amusingduck said:
Countdown said:
I'm a simple bloke and that's perhaps why I can't see the issue. If i want to go to a Pub and 'Spoons is the only one available I'll make sure I do my damndest not to get banned. Their gaff, their rules. In a way it's the same as having a driving license and ending up banned for breaching various driving laws.
I think it'd be a bit more like the roads being a privately owned monopoly, where your ability to drive can be effectively removed despite not having broken any laws, and having no route to redress.Hmm, who knew?
Countdown said:
I'm a simple bloke and that's perhaps why I can't see the issue. If i want to go to a Pub and 'Spoons is the only one available I'll make sure I do my damndest not to get banned. Their gaff, their rules. In a way it's the same as having a driving license and ending up banned for breaching various driving laws.
How about if they had different rules depending on your choice of politics ?amusingduck said:
Countdown said:
I'm a simple bloke and that's perhaps why I can't see the issue. If i want to go to a Pub and 'Spoons is the only one available I'll make sure I do my damndest not to get banned. Their gaff, their rules. In a way it's the same as having a driving license and ending up banned for breaching various driving laws.
I think it'd be a bit more like the roads being a privately owned monopoly, where your ability to drive can be effectively removed despite not having broken any laws, and having no route to redress.Being barred for doing stuff 'Spoons have asked me not to do - their gaff, their rules
dasigty said:
This is what happens when ill informed people latch on to the spoon fed nonsense of the MSM.
An "Anon" is an individual, "Q" is a board (One of many) where links are posted up to be discussed.
The number one rule of that board is "Do your own research".
There is not now, or ever has been a qanon except in the many attacks by the MSM.
Are there approved sources of information? Can you please list some of them out so we can be educated properly?An "Anon" is an individual, "Q" is a board (One of many) where links are posted up to be discussed.
The number one rule of that board is "Do your own research".
There is not now, or ever has been a qanon except in the many attacks by the MSM.
dasigty said:
Countdown said:
I'm a simple bloke and that's perhaps why I can't see the issue. If i want to go to a Pub and 'Spoons is the only one available I'll make sure I do my damndest not to get banned. Their gaff, their rules. In a way it's the same as having a driving license and ending up banned for breaching various driving laws.
How about if they had different rules depending on your choice of politics ?
Countdown said:
dasigty said:
There is not now, or ever has been a qanon except in the many attacks by the MSM.
https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/terror/conspiracies-plotsDo you see all those references to QAnon.....?
dasigty said:
Countdown said:
dasigty said:
There is not now, or ever has been a qanon except in the many attacks by the MSM.
https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/terror/conspiracies-plotsDo you see all those references to QAnon.....?
Not even joking.
dasigty said:
1) There has never been a qanon, it`s a MSM conspiracy theory.
Jeez, I'm not one to indulge in ad hominem attacks, but you're utterly bonkers, OP. Don't you think that the fact that pretty much everyone on this thread disagrees with you might perhaps be an indicator you're barking up the wrong tree?Or it could be that we're all leftist, soy boy, lentil eating, Prius driving Bernie fans. Yes, that must be it. It's the only logical explanation when you think about it
Here’s the thing about doing your own research (which I’m sure a number of posters on this thread will disagree with)...
What is research?
Research is:
- speaking to the primary sources.
- visiting archives and libraries.
- gathering information.
- etc.
Research is not:
- visiting websites to read what someone else has written.
Research is hard, takes time, and often needs expert knowledge to understand what you’re researching - it’s a full time job for some journalists, for example. Visiting websites and deciding you like what they’ve written is not research. You have no idea whether the person writing knows what they’re talking about or not. You have no idea whether the name at the top of the page is the person who wrote it, even.
People like to buy into conspiracy theories - they can read around the subject on various web sites, believe they’ve “researched” it, and feel smart. That’s nice for them, but it’s not research. It’s believing what someone’s told you, often followed by deriding someone else for believing what someone’s told them, simply because the source is “mainstream” and so somehow wrong...
What is research?
Research is:
- speaking to the primary sources.
- visiting archives and libraries.
- gathering information.
- etc.
Research is not:
- visiting websites to read what someone else has written.
Research is hard, takes time, and often needs expert knowledge to understand what you’re researching - it’s a full time job for some journalists, for example. Visiting websites and deciding you like what they’ve written is not research. You have no idea whether the person writing knows what they’re talking about or not. You have no idea whether the name at the top of the page is the person who wrote it, even.
People like to buy into conspiracy theories - they can read around the subject on various web sites, believe they’ve “researched” it, and feel smart. That’s nice for them, but it’s not research. It’s believing what someone’s told you, often followed by deriding someone else for believing what someone’s told them, simply because the source is “mainstream” and so somehow wrong...
dasigty said:
Countdown said:
dasigty said:
There is not now, or ever has been a qanon except in the many attacks by the MSM.
https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/terror/conspiracies-plotsDo you see all those references to QAnon.....?
What was the "movement" you were referring to in your 8chan wibble?
DanL said:
Here’s the thing about doing your own research (which I’m sure a number of posters on this thread will disagree with)...
What is research?
Research is:
- speaking to the primary sources.
- visiting archives and libraries.
- gathering information.
- etc.
Research is not:
- visiting websites to read what someone else has written.
Research is hard, takes time, and often needs expert knowledge to understand what you’re researching - it’s a full time job for some journalists, for example. Visiting websites and deciding you like what they’ve written is not research. You have no idea whether the person writing knows what they’re talking about or not. You have no idea whether the name at the top of the page is the person who wrote it, even.
People like to buy into conspiracy theories - they can read around the subject on various web sites, believe they’ve “researched” it, and feel smart. That’s nice for them, but it’s not research. It’s believing what someone’s told you, often followed by deriding someone else for believing what someone’s told them, simply because the source is “mainstream” and so somehow wrong...
What is research?
Research is:
- speaking to the primary sources.
- visiting archives and libraries.
- gathering information.
- etc.
Research is not:
- visiting websites to read what someone else has written.
Research is hard, takes time, and often needs expert knowledge to understand what you’re researching - it’s a full time job for some journalists, for example. Visiting websites and deciding you like what they’ve written is not research. You have no idea whether the person writing knows what they’re talking about or not. You have no idea whether the name at the top of the page is the person who wrote it, even.
People like to buy into conspiracy theories - they can read around the subject on various web sites, believe they’ve “researched” it, and feel smart. That’s nice for them, but it’s not research. It’s believing what someone’s told you, often followed by deriding someone else for believing what someone’s told them, simply because the source is “mainstream” and so somehow wrong...
DanL said:
Here’s the thing about doing your own research (which I’m sure a number of posters on this thread will disagree with)...
What is research?
Research is:
- speaking to the primary sources.
- visiting archives and libraries.
- gathering information.
- etc.
Research is not:
- visiting websites to read what someone else has written.
Research is hard, takes time, and often needs expert knowledge to understand what you’re researching - it’s a full time job for some journalists, for example. Visiting websites and deciding you like what they’ve written is not research. You have no idea whether the person writing knows what they’re talking about or not. You have no idea whether the name at the top of the page is the person who wrote it, even.
People like to buy into conspiracy theories - they can read around the subject on various web sites, believe they’ve “researched” it, and feel smart. That’s nice for them, but it’s not research. It’s believing what someone’s told you, often followed by deriding someone else for believing what someone’s told them, simply because the source is “mainstream” and so somehow wrong...
Excellent post.What is research?
Research is:
- speaking to the primary sources.
- visiting archives and libraries.
- gathering information.
- etc.
Research is not:
- visiting websites to read what someone else has written.
Research is hard, takes time, and often needs expert knowledge to understand what you’re researching - it’s a full time job for some journalists, for example. Visiting websites and deciding you like what they’ve written is not research. You have no idea whether the person writing knows what they’re talking about or not. You have no idea whether the name at the top of the page is the person who wrote it, even.
People like to buy into conspiracy theories - they can read around the subject on various web sites, believe they’ve “researched” it, and feel smart. That’s nice for them, but it’s not research. It’s believing what someone’s told you, often followed by deriding someone else for believing what someone’s told them, simply because the source is “mainstream” and so somehow wrong...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff