Lockdown Imminent (Vol. 2)

Author
Discussion

WindyCommon

3,382 posts

240 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
Is anyone else surprised that Elmbridge in leafy Surrey is a Tier II region? It is mainly nice commuter towns like Esher, Weybridge and Cobham. As far as I’m aware there are no large colleges or student populations. Very few poor areas with crowded accommodation etc. Lots of independent schools and care homes..?

It just seems anomalous given experiences in similar areas. Does anyone have any idea what has driven this?

Brave Fart

5,744 posts

112 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
Ructions said:
Honestly? I don't know. I would hope that we have a lot less cases than we have now and the pressure would be eased somewhat on our already stretched hospitals and public services. The virus isn't going away, but we can help to stop the spread and if that means sitting in for a few weeks, then so be it.
I don't mean to sound rude, but your reasoning is crazy. You're saying "let's try to put things on hold so that we have the same problems as today, but in a few weeks time." Meanwhile destroying businesses, jobs and education. For what? You'll only be faced with the same problem further down the line.

So in the long run a lockdown just defers the pain, but causes harm that could be avoided. In the long run, the lockdown has a harmful effect, and I'm amazed that so many people cannot see this.

sim72

4,945 posts

135 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
WindyCommon said:
Is anyone else surprised that Elmbridge in leafy Surrey is a Tier II region? It is mainly nice commuter towns like Esher, Weybridge and Cobham. As far as I’m aware there are no large colleges or student populations. Very few poor areas with crowded accommodation etc. Lots of independent schools and care homes..?

It just seems anomalous given experiences in similar areas. Does anyone have any idea what has driven this?
There are a couple of areas here in the Midlands that are very similar and have seen huge rises in COVID rates. Our area (no university or college, not much deprivation) went from 40 to 140 per 100K in a couple of weeks, though it's dropped back to 109 now.

kingston12

5,486 posts

158 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
WindyCommon said:
Is anyone else surprised that Elmbridge in leafy Surrey is a Tier II region? It is mainly nice commuter towns like Esher, Weybridge and Cobham. As far as I’m aware there are no large colleges or student populations. Very few poor areas with crowded accommodation etc. Lots of independent schools and care homes..?

It just seems anomalous given experiences in similar areas. Does anyone have any idea what has driven this?
Adjoining borough Richmond (officially part of London) has claimed that it's very high rate is largely driven by students who have tested positive after going to University elsewhere. The result comes back and counts as a positive in Richmond because the student is still registered as living at their parents address in the borough.

That could be the same for Elmbridge although I don't think they have officially claimed that yet.

foreright

1,037 posts

243 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
sim72 said:
There are a couple of areas here in the Midlands that are very similar and have seen huge rises in COVID rates. Our area (no university or college, not much deprivation) went from 40 to 140 per 100K in a couple of weeks, though it's dropped back to 109 now.
As already said (I think) could it be students not registering with gps near uni and keeping their home address testing positive and counting for that area rather than the one they live in?

survivalist

5,676 posts

191 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
nigelpugh7 said:
interstellar said:
Yep it’s bks. My daughters school just decided to close with an hours notice for the rest of the week before half term as have several cases and are panicking.

No one reported as needed anything other than a hankie!!

Joke!
They sent my 14 year old Son home along with all the rest of his year on Thursday last week, it was due to one teacher in that year testing positive.

But my 11 year old daughter is still going to same school every day, well for now at least.

We are part expecting to get another notice shortly telling us that our daughter will have to stay home too, just in time for half term.
Reading the wording of the new law relating to Self Isolation, it says that you can be fined if you do not self isolate following a positive test or being told by NHS Test and Trace that you need to self isolate.

I assume, therefore, that anyone else telling you to self isolate doesn’t put you at risk of a fine.

sim72

4,945 posts

135 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
survivalist said:
nigelpugh7 said:
interstellar said:
Yep it’s bks. My daughters school just decided to close with an hours notice for the rest of the week before half term as have several cases and are panicking.

No one reported as needed anything other than a hankie!!

Joke!
They sent my 14 year old Son home along with all the rest of his year on Thursday last week, it was due to one teacher in that year testing positive.

But my 11 year old daughter is still going to same school every day, well for now at least.

We are part expecting to get another notice shortly telling us that our daughter will have to stay home too, just in time for half term.
Reading the wording of the new law relating to Self Isolation, it says that you can be fined if you do not self isolate following a positive test or being told by NHS Test and Trace that you need to self isolate.

I assume, therefore, that anyone else telling you to self isolate doesn’t put you at risk of a fine.
This was discussed previously on another thread. There is serious ambiguity. It *appears* that if the school has been ordered by PHE that X students should self-isolate, then that is equivalent to Track and Trace, and they (or more likely their parents) could be fined. However it also appears that the school needs to state that clearly ("Public Health England have stated that your child must now isolate for Z days") on the letter to parents, which some aren't doing. Without that, there can be no fine.

Smollet

10,609 posts

191 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
WindyCommon said:
Is anyone else surprised that Elmbridge in leafy Surrey is a Tier II region? It is mainly nice commuter towns like Esher, Weybridge and Cobham. As far as I’m aware there are no large colleges or student populations. Very few poor areas with crowded accommodation etc. Lots of independent schools and care homes..?

It just seems anomalous given experiences in similar areas. Does anyone have any idea what has driven this?
I live in Elmbridge and there are a lot of students who resister their home address as well as campus and apparently PHE have admitted they’re used both addresses in their figures. So that could be one driver. Currently the infection rate is dropping but still about 130 for every 100k which is another reason for the Tier2.

survivalist

5,676 posts

191 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
sim72 said:
survivalist said:
nigelpugh7 said:
interstellar said:
Yep it’s bks. My daughters school just decided to close with an hours notice for the rest of the week before half term as have several cases and are panicking.

No one reported as needed anything other than a hankie!!

Joke!
They sent my 14 year old Son home along with all the rest of his year on Thursday last week, it was due to one teacher in that year testing positive.

But my 11 year old daughter is still going to same school every day, well for now at least.

We are part expecting to get another notice shortly telling us that our daughter will have to stay home too, just in time for half term.
Reading the wording of the new law relating to Self Isolation, it says that you can be fined if you do not self isolate following a positive test or being told by NHS Test and Trace that you need to self isolate.

I assume, therefore, that anyone else telling you to self isolate doesn’t put you at risk of a fine.
This was discussed previously on another thread. There is serious ambiguity. It *appears* that if the school has been ordered by PHE that X students should self-isolate, then that is equivalent to Track and Trace, and they (or more likely their parents) could be fined. However it also appears that the school needs to state that clearly ("Public Health England have stated that your child must now isolate for Z days") on the letter to parents, which some aren't doing. Without that, there can be no fine.
Indeed. From a more practical perspective, if you're not being contacted by track and trace then I struggle to see how you would actually be 'caught' anyway. If they aren't phoning to see if you are home etc

Barring some monumentally stupid incident where a celebrity posts pictures of themselves on holiday etc

A Winner Is You

24,989 posts

228 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all

Smollet

10,609 posts

191 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
A Winner Is You said:
Definition of stupidity. Doing the same thing over again hoping for a different result. Clearly they don’t like what Ivor Cummins from Dublin Uni has said in his very detailed forensic blogs but prefer to listen to Gerry Killeen who said there are going to be 20-30k deaths with absolutely no credible science to back it up.

leef44

4,401 posts

154 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
Brave Fart said:
Ructions said:
Honestly? I don't know. I would hope that we have a lot less cases than we have now and the pressure would be eased somewhat on our already stretched hospitals and public services. The virus isn't going away, but we can help to stop the spread and if that means sitting in for a few weeks, then so be it.
I don't mean to sound rude, but your reasoning is crazy. You're saying "let's try to put things on hold so that we have the same problems as today, but in a few weeks time." Meanwhile destroying businesses, jobs and education. For what? You'll only be faced with the same problem further down the line.

So in the long run a lockdown just defers the pain, but causes harm that could be avoided. In the long run, the lockdown has a harmful effect, and I'm amazed that so many people cannot see this.
This is what really frustrates me. Small businesses takes years of blood and sweat to make them work and the government can wipe them out with one swift blow.

Every year, tens of thousands of people die of flu each year because we cannot control it and do not always have the vaccine for every strain of flu going round every winter. We don't lockdown the country for half year due to this because it would wipe out the economy.

And yet here we are, wiping out the economy, wiping out family livelihoods, increasing mental stress and suicide rates. Many businesses which have taken years to build will be permanently written off.

The woman on the news yesterday who spent 500,000 building restaurant table pods to allow her business to operate and now told she has to shut. It's draconian.

RammyMP

6,784 posts

154 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
sim72 said:
The Welsh lockdown is nonsense.

Apparently, despite the evidence showing that schools are a major vector of COVID, it's OK to send all primary schools and Years 7 and 8 back after a week.

That's like trying to let a bouncy castle down while someone's blowing it up from the other side.
Yes, it doesn’t make sense? Also the chap said work from home if you can otherwise you can still go to work. So that’s all factories and building sites carrying on. Not much of a lock down really.

monkfish1

11,110 posts

225 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
Ructions said:
monkfish1 said:
Im not asking you to predict the future. Im asking you to explain what you think would happen to the virus, specifically, once the lockdown you crave ends?
Honestly? I don't know. I would hope that we have a lot less cases than we have now and the pressure would be eased somewhat on our already stretched hospitals and public services. The virus isn't going away, but we can help to stop the spread and if that means sitting in for a few weeks, then so be it.
Once you release lock down it carries on just the same.

You DONT stop the spread. You have just DELAYED it. Not reduced it. In the meantime consigned a few more 10,000's to the dole queue.

To achieve precisly nothing.

Can you not see this? Seriously?

monkfish1

11,110 posts

225 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
Brave Fart said:
Ructions said:
Honestly? I don't know. I would hope that we have a lot less cases than we have now and the pressure would be eased somewhat on our already stretched hospitals and public services. The virus isn't going away, but we can help to stop the spread and if that means sitting in for a few weeks, then so be it.
I don't mean to sound rude, but your reasoning is crazy. You're saying "let's try to put things on hold so that we have the same problems as today, but in a few weeks time." Meanwhile destroying businesses, jobs and education. For what? You'll only be faced with the same problem further down the line.

So in the long run a lockdown just defers the pain, but causes harm that could be avoided. In the long run, the lockdown has a harmful effect, and I'm amazed that so many people cannot see this.
Scary isnt it.? That people simply cannot see it.

Actually, depressing is the word!

The total and utter destruction of our way of life. To get to the same end state we would get to without destroying everything. Ie, some 10,000,s of deaths.

I keep trying to convince myself that these people who think lockdowns achieve anything might change there mind when they are penniless, and homeless. But i doubt it somehow. It will be "someone elses fault".

As someone else said, trying to control this virus is akin to trying to control the weather. Futile.

vaud

50,597 posts

156 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
A repost but a worthy read on the societal and impact to "R" of each kind of restriction:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/governmen...

Thankyou4calling

10,607 posts

174 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
The UK hasn’t had what I’d call a lockdown.

No where near it really.

Even during the toughest times you could go out every day, loads of shops open, most businesses still trading and customers visiting.

It was called a lockdown but it was nothing like it.

Edited by Thankyou4calling on Monday 19th October 21:17

vaud

50,597 posts

156 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
Thankyou4calling said:
The UK hasn’t had what I’d call a lockdown.

No where near it really.

Even during the toughest times you could go out every day, loads of shops open, most businesses still trading and customers visiting.

It was called a lockdown but it was nothing like it.

Edited by Thankyou4calling on Monday 19th October 21:17
Very true, compared to say France or Spain.

Under lock down I shopped twice a week. Went walking with my daughters. Went for a drive over the hills. etc

monkfish1

11,110 posts

225 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
Thankyou4calling said:
The UK hadn’t had what I’d call a lockdown.

No where near it really.
Plenty enough for destruction of peoples livlihoods and businesses. Just keep watching the jobless total.........................

And mortgage / rent defaults in a years time.

Not-The-Messiah

3,620 posts

82 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
RammyMP said:
sim72 said:
The Welsh lockdown is nonsense.

Apparently, despite the evidence showing that schools are a major vector of COVID, it's OK to send all primary schools and Years 7 and 8 back after a week.

That's like trying to let a bouncy castle down while someone's blowing it up from the other side.
Yes, it doesn’t make sense? Also the chap said work from home if you can otherwise you can still go to work. So that’s all factories and building sites carrying on. Not much of a lock down really.
I can understand them trying to keep kids in school but these kids won't have jobs to go to when they leave anyway now.

The Welsh should know better than most what happens when sectors of your economy disappear.