46th President of the United States, Joe Biden
Discussion
deeps said:
Not at all. I read what you wrote in the 'Putin interview' thread and replied on page 5. I agreed with everything you said and could have written the same myself.
Ps. thank you for not placing me in their catagory
Ah yes. I hadn’t seen your reply as like many other potentially interesting threads on here, I’d given up on that one as it was like banging my head against a wall whilst punching myself in the nuts Ps. thank you for not placing me in their catagory
.Commander is obviously a very naughty boy
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68366306
24 bites (and that's just to the secret service)
Gargamel said:
Commander is obviously a very naughty boy
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68366306
24 bites (and that's just to the secret service)
Thats really not acceptable. Can you imagine that in any other work place? In any other circumstance the dog owner would have been prosecuted and the dog euthanised. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68366306
24 bites (and that's just to the secret service)
Whilst I fully understand that Biden is likely to be too busy to train his dogs (Commander is not the only one with a history of biting people) surely it's within his ability to secure the services of a professional trainer to ensure that these behaviours are eliminated? If not, what's the differences between Biden owning a number of GSDs that bite people at will, and some chavvy scum in Jaywick owning XL Bullies that get out of control and do harm to people?
Bonefish Blues said:
I'm concerned that his SS contingent seem to be rather slow learners...
They are quite understated in their wit though...Quote
An unnamed senior agent in one email advised that agents protecting Mr Biden and his family "must be creative to ensure our own personal safety".
"The recent dog bites have challenged us to adjust our operational tactics when Commander is present - please give lots of room (staying a terrain feature away if possible)," the agent wrote.
Al Gorithum said:
dvs_dave said:
Where are all those nose tapping “5 for the big guy” clowns now?
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/202...
INTERVIEW OF: ANTHONY BOBULINSKI - Tuesday, February 13, 2024
(under oath)
"10 held for H for the big guy." The H in that message is Hunter Biden, and the big guy -- 100 percent -- is Joe Biden"
southendpier said:
Have you chaps read this?
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/202...
INTERVIEW OF: ANTHONY BOBULINSKI - Tuesday, February 13, 2024
(under oath)
"10 held for H for the big guy." The H in that message is Hunter Biden, and the big guy -- 100 percent -- is Joe Biden"
Love from Byker xhttps://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/202...
INTERVIEW OF: ANTHONY BOBULINSKI - Tuesday, February 13, 2024
(under oath)
"10 held for H for the big guy." The H in that message is Hunter Biden, and the big guy -- 100 percent -- is Joe Biden"
"Also love the way Southendpier is bringing up more discredited 'witnesses'"
https://newrepublic.com/article/178960/republican-...
https://abcnews.go.com/US/biden-critic-worked-hunt...
Called out by Raskin
https://abcnews.go.com/US/raskin-blasts-gops-top-b...
and the letter
https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/democra...
southendpier said:
Have you chaps read this?
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/202...
INTERVIEW OF: ANTHONY BOBULINSKI - Tuesday, February 13, 2024
(under oath)
"10 held for H for the big guy." The H in that message is Hunter Biden, and the big guy -- 100 percent -- is Joe Biden"
The Anthony Bobulinski that was given an envelope by Mark Meadows whilst wearing a ski mask? The Anthony Bobulinksi that has provided zero evidence of Joe Biden being involved in Hunter and Jim Biden businesses?https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/202...
INTERVIEW OF: ANTHONY BOBULINSKI - Tuesday, February 13, 2024
(under oath)
"10 held for H for the big guy." The H in that message is Hunter Biden, and the big guy -- 100 percent -- is Joe Biden"
Al Gorithum said:
Love from Byker x
"Also love the way Southendpier is bringing up more discredited 'witnesses'"
https://newrepublic.com/article/178960/republican-...
https://abcnews.go.com/US/biden-critic-worked-hunt...
Called out by Raskin
https://abcnews.go.com/US/raskin-blasts-gops-top-b...
and the letter
https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/democra...
Alright, Al? "Also love the way Southendpier is bringing up more discredited 'witnesses'"
https://newrepublic.com/article/178960/republican-...
https://abcnews.go.com/US/biden-critic-worked-hunt...
Called out by Raskin
https://abcnews.go.com/US/raskin-blasts-gops-top-b...
and the letter
https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/democra...
Posting a banned member response in here, that's an interesting one.
Always great to have a back-and-forth on this thread; but have you, y'know, actually clicked on, and then read the links you've (re)posted?
3 don't work.
I suggest you at least make the tiniest effort to read what you're blindly posting and asking others to read otherwise you could come across as a bit of a fanboy, which could be embarrassing.
southendpier said:
....come across as a bit of a fanboy, which could be embarrassing.
Quite the self-own that.As you're keen on asking people to read, have a good afternoon with this:
https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/februa...
southendpier said:
Alright, Al?
Posting a banned member response in here, that's an interesting one.
Always great to have a back-and-forth on this thread; but have you, y'know, actually clicked on, and then read the links you've (re)posted?
3 don't work.
I suggest you at least make the tiniest effort to read what you're blindly posting and asking others to read otherwise you could come across as a bit of a fanboy, which could be embarrassing.
No mate. I've not seen one single contribution of yours have any validity yet, and as has been pointed out by others, your latest one is also flawed. Forgive me for not being interested in being misled. Posting a banned member response in here, that's an interesting one.
Always great to have a back-and-forth on this thread; but have you, y'know, actually clicked on, and then read the links you've (re)posted?
3 don't work.
I suggest you at least make the tiniest effort to read what you're blindly posting and asking others to read otherwise you could come across as a bit of a fanboy, which could be embarrassing.
Definitely a Fanboi of not having my time wasted.
Edited by Al Gorithum on Thursday 22 February 13:03
southendpier said:
Alright, Al?
Posting a banned member response in here, that's an interesting one.
Always great to have a back-and-forth on this thread; but have you, y'know, actually clicked on, and then read the links you've (re)posted?
3 don't work.
I suggest you at least make the tiniest effort to read what you're blindly posting and asking others to read otherwise you could come across as a bit of a fanboy, which could be embarrassing.
<snip>discredited 'witnesses'Posting a banned member response in here, that's an interesting one.
Always great to have a back-and-forth on this thread; but have you, y'know, actually clicked on, and then read the links you've (re)posted?
3 don't work.
I suggest you at least make the tiniest effort to read what you're blindly posting and asking others to read otherwise you could come across as a bit of a fanboy, which could be embarrassing.
New Republic
abc news
Called out by Raskin
abc news
and the letter
oversight democrats
Have you not heard the updates?
It wasn't burisma after all. They meant "something something china". Honest. Whatsapp messages from "IRS whistleblowers" apparently.
Political geniuses. Top class investigation.
In other news, talking heads on TV are pointing out that if the "investigators" swallow blatant s
te like that hook, line and sinker, they'll believe just about anything and are ripe for exploitation.
M.
It wasn't burisma after all. They meant "something something china". Honest. Whatsapp messages from "IRS whistleblowers" apparently.
Political geniuses. Top class investigation.
In other news, talking heads on TV are pointing out that if the "investigators" swallow blatant s
te like that hook, line and sinker, they'll believe just about anything and are ripe for exploitation.M.
southendpier said:
Posting a banned member response in here, that's an interesting one.
What sort of person gets a valued and informed poster like Byker banned from a thread because they don't share their views? Especially when the person squealing to the mods is one that contributes nothing of value and regularly posts disinformation?
Not a pier that I would want to hitch my boat to.
southendpier said:
Al Gorithum said:
dvs_dave said:
Where are all those nose tapping “5 for the big guy” clowns now?
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/202...
INTERVIEW OF: ANTHONY BOBULINSKI - Tuesday, February 13, 2024
(under oath)
"10 held for H for the big guy." The H in that message is Hunter Biden, and the big guy -- 100 percent -- is Joe Biden"
We got a live one!
I R disapoint. He seems upbeat about it, perhaps he's stopped asking nicely.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff