How many have been vaccinated so far?
Discussion
Blackpuddin said:
CraigyMc said:
Blackpuddin said:
anonymoususer said:
Which is why we should bring them over and vaccinate them. Not only would it show the Europedians that we don't hate them it would be a boost to the economy.
Nice idea but unfortunately much of the EU has been or is in the process of being brainwashed into believing the 'fake nooz' being put out by the likes of Macron that the AZ vaccine is not only ineffective but worth going on strike over if, for example, you and your health industry colleagues are told they're having it (as has happened in Belgium). But of course that's just anecdotal.
In terms of "brainyness" or whatever -- most of them are uni-or-better educated, pretty simply because the work I do demands that, and I met most of them through working in their respective countries with them. I would say it's a fair bet that few if any are tabloid readers.
One of the the cleverest of them is an agrégé *. She's currently got C19 (she's a teacher), and wants her 81 and 82 year old parents to be vaccinated ASAP (North France) -- they have been informed they'll be given their vaccination dates in late March. Note: that's not vaccinations in late March; it's when they'll be told their vaccination date.
* agrégé = French national level competition exam that leads to the best teaching jobs in France, doesn't really have a UK equivalent but if it did it would be like getting a professorship at oxbridge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agr%C3%A9gation
Anyway, sorry for the thread tangent. Back to good numbers yesterday, surprisingly.
CraigyMc said:
Gadgetmac said:
14,000+ 2nd doses...thats a big jump isn’t it?
Only for England.The other countries have been doing a lot more 2nd jabs (Scotland+Wales did 17,000 between them yesterday).
spikeyhead said:
CraigyMc said:
Gadgetmac said:
14,000+ 2nd doses...thats a big jump isn’t it?
Only for England.The other countries have been doing a lot more 2nd jabs (Scotland+Wales did 17,000 between them yesterday).
Vanden Saab said:
spikeyhead said:
CraigyMc said:
Gadgetmac said:
14,000+ 2nd doses...thats a big jump isn’t it?
Only for England.The other countries have been doing a lot more 2nd jabs (Scotland+Wales did 17,000 between them yesterday).
Gweeds said:
Got a text asking me to book today, and now booked in for a week tomorrow.
I’m 51, no underlying conditions etc (also had COVID last year but mild case). North Hants. I was expecting to be called early April so they’re a month ahead or thereabouts.
I am in North Hants also, I was Tier 4 but only had the vaccine last week - way behind schedule. It all seems a bit random. I’m 51, no underlying conditions etc (also had COVID last year but mild case). North Hants. I was expecting to be called early April so they’re a month ahead or thereabouts.
My wife is older than you but hasn’t had any contact re vaccine.
Russ T Bolt said:
I am in North Hants also, I was Tier 4 but only had the vaccine last week - way behind schedule. It all seems a bit random.
My wife is older than you but hasn’t had any contact re vaccine.
I think it has to be down to how fast surgeries are getting through their patients? I was surprised when I got the text today and honestly I’m not that comfortable knowing that people who should be ahead of me in the same county are actually not. My wife is older than you but hasn’t had any contact re vaccine.
It is random for sure. A 47 year old friend got her last week because of her ‘asthma’. She hasn’t needed any treatment for it since she was in her late teens. She was wtf at that one.
Gweeds said:
I think it has to be down to how fast surgeries are getting through their patients? I was surprised when I got the text today and honestly I’m not that comfortable knowing that people who should be ahead of me in the same county are actually not.
It is random for sure. A 47 year old friend got her last week because of her ‘asthma’. She hasn’t needed any treatment for it since she was in her late teens. She was wtf at that one.
I think it is based on a key word search from medical records, even if they are historical conditions.It is random for sure. A 47 year old friend got her last week because of her ‘asthma’. She hasn’t needed any treatment for it since she was in her late teens. She was wtf at that one.
Wifey and I had our first jab today (Pfizer one). Must admit the organisation was spot on, no hanging around at all, even with a lot of "are you allergic to" .....type questions. Had jab, then had to wait for 15 minutes just to watch for any adverse reaction, then home. No side effects at all, none (despite the list of potential things they read out). Quite impressed with it all.
vaud said:
Gweeds said:
I think it has to be down to how fast surgeries are getting through their patients? I was surprised when I got the text today and honestly I’m not that comfortable knowing that people who should be ahead of me in the same county are actually not.
It is random for sure. A 47 year old friend got her last week because of her ‘asthma’. She hasn’t needed any treatment for it since she was in her late teens. She was wtf at that one.
I think it is based on a key word search from medical records, even if they are historical conditions.It is random for sure. A 47 year old friend got her last week because of her ‘asthma’. She hasn’t needed any treatment for it since she was in her late teens. She was wtf at that one.
You don't go through tens of millions of medical records one by one manually, looking for whether someone has "chronic asthma" instead of "asthma". It'll be a keyword search implemented differently on umpteen backend patient record systems.
It's unlikely there will be any real coordination or standards on how the searches work or exactly what they are searching for. It'll be 80/20, get as much done as possible and mop up stragglers later.
I wish medical IT was perfect. I did some work for Siemens Medical years ago, and even then it was a bit of a stshow. They are doing their best with what they have, and mistakes will be made.
CraigyMc said:
It has to be.
You don't go through tens of millions of medical records one by one manually, looking for whether someone has "chronic asthma" instead of "asthma". It'll be a keyword search implemented differently on umpteen backend patient record systems.
It's unlikely there will be any real coordination or standards on how the searches work or exactly what they are searching for. It'll be 80/20, get as much done as possible and mop up stragglers later.
I wish medical IT was perfect. I did some work for Siemens Medical years ago, and even then it was a bit of a stshow. They are doing their best with what they have, and mistakes will be made.
I agree. Many medical records will also have been transcribed from paper records adding to the complexity.You don't go through tens of millions of medical records one by one manually, looking for whether someone has "chronic asthma" instead of "asthma". It'll be a keyword search implemented differently on umpteen backend patient record systems.
It's unlikely there will be any real coordination or standards on how the searches work or exactly what they are searching for. It'll be 80/20, get as much done as possible and mop up stragglers later.
I wish medical IT was perfect. I did some work for Siemens Medical years ago, and even then it was a bit of a stshow. They are doing their best with what they have, and mistakes will be made.
Gweeds said:
vaud said:
I think it is based on a key word search from medical records, even if they are historical conditions.
That would make sense. I had a DVT 4 years ago but that was resolved. Could be that I guess. My wife has mild Asthma, but does take medication for it, she is 58 but no contact re vaccine.
I have been shielding for the last year based on many letters received from the NHS, my original appointment (via the NHS website) was for this Saturday, my GP Surgery contacted me last week and offered an earlier appointment in their newly setup centre.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff