Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 10

Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 10

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

technodup

7,584 posts

131 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
he SNP and some indy supporters do not want devomax or a federal settlement because they fear such a thing would significantly reduce any chance of full independence.
Devolution was supposed to reduce the chance of independence.

It increased massively.


hidetheelephants

24,483 posts

194 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
technodup said:
hidetheelephants said:
he SNP and some indy supporters do not want devomax or a federal settlement because they fear such a thing would significantly reduce any chance of full independence.
Devolution was supposed to reduce the chance of independence.

It increased massively.
That may be, however they don't want it and argue against it consistently. Devomax is moot as there are large areas of legislative/executive power allocated to ScotGov which have not been taken up because they're feartie bawbags. A federal settlement would go some way to solving the Tam Dalzell Question and other easter eggs hidden in the undergrowth by Donald Dewar.

Evercross

6,015 posts

65 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
A federal settlement would go some way to solving the Tam Dalzell Question and other easter eggs hidden in the undergrowth by Donald Dewar.
Considering the constitutional loopholes that Sturgeon has deftly used to cover up her misdeeds it might be an idea that existing arrangements are tightened-up and some adequate checks-and-balances put in place before we go adding to the 'easter eggs'.

irc

7,341 posts

137 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
marcella said:
I like the idea of an independent Scotland
Why do you like the idea?

What would an indy Scotland be able to do that a devolved govt can't?

We already have power over almost everything that effects day to day life. - health, police, fire, law, local govt, etc etc. In fact there is a history of the SNP being offered more powers but not taking them

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14885035.snp-c...

The issue is getting good govt of the existing set up. Unless there is something I can't see.


marcella

153 posts

125 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Thanks for those that replied to my previous post, glad I'm not alone.

One thing that bothers me is that people I know that are 'for' the SNP have just seen the recent scandal of NS as the tories trying to get her kicked out. I can't believe that they cannot see she's in the wrong and yesterdays trial was an embarrassment (and not just for NS).

The other thing that bothers me slightly is I keep hearing from the rest of the UK on why we are idiots for wanting independence but I haven't heard them actually saying why they want to keep us. It would be nice to hear a bit more from the English especially on why they want us to remain and not bashing us for always putting our hands out and taking all 'their' money.

Quisling

539 posts

40 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
marcella said:
Thanks for those that replied to my previous post, glad I'm not alone.

One thing that bothers me is that people I know that are 'for' the SNP have just seen the recent scandal of NS as the tories trying to get her kicked out. I can't believe that they cannot see she's in the wrong and yesterdays trial was an embarrassment (and not just for NS).

The other thing that bothers me slightly is I keep hearing from the rest of the UK on why we are idiots for wanting independence but I haven't heard them actually saying why they want to keep us. It would be nice to hear a bit more from the English especially on why they want us to remain and not bashing us for always putting our hands out and taking all 'their' money.
Why do power hungry idiots in westminster want to keep scotland?

probably something todo with them being power hungry idiots

that and they probably don't want to be sharing a land border with a hostile neighbour

And

Tell me after looking at the actions of team facepaint

Can you see it being anything other than a hostile relationship?

amusingduck

9,398 posts

137 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
marcella said:
The other thing that bothers me slightly is I keep hearing from the rest of the UK on why we are idiots for wanting independence but I haven't heard them actually saying why they want to keep us. It would be nice to hear a bit more from the English especially on why they want us to remain and not bashing us for always putting our hands out and taking all 'their' money.
I don't mind either way, it's your decision not ours. The money doesn't bother me, it's our(UK) money, not our (England) money.

My problem with independence is the rhetoric and ""logic"" used by the SNats. It's utterly pathetic that any criticism is just deflected into Tories/Westminster, as nicely illustrated with the recent Fishy furore. Any criticism of Sturgeon is immediately pounced upon with but look at Tories. Or that's me convinced pal, now I'm going to vote tory. It's so, so pathetic.

Tories are simultaneously the root of all evil, and they set the standard for Sturgeon to uphold. Remarkable mental gymnastics, but the face-painters lap it up.

I think it's inevitable. If the case stacked up, I'd have nothing to say. It just doesn't stack up. No doubt Scotland could be a successful independent country, but it comes with a severe price for at least a few decades. Mention that, and you're a tory shill astroturfer. It's a cult.

SNP corrupt? Nae bother, they'll be gone after indy. To be replaced by persons unknown. Don't worry that NS is a power hungry control freak silly

Currency? Nae botha, it's our pound too y'know. As though that resolves any of the issues.

Any and all issues are simply hand-waved away with we'll sort it out afterwards. Dangerous idiots.

Cults don't lead people to the promised land.

Evercross

6,015 posts

65 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
marcella said:
One thing that bothers me is that people I know that are 'for' the SNP have just seen the recent scandal of NS as the tories trying to get her kicked out.
Perhaps you could tell these people that it was The SNP Scottish Government that set up the enquiry, not the 'Tories', and it was about why they wasted half-a-million pounds plus (and counting) on losing a legal case that was (allegedly) supposed to protect women from sexual harassment, but failed.

It wasn't about getting Sturgeon kicked out (although if she was responsible for the failure she is rubbish at her job), but I honestly reckon you would be wasting your time.

Plus I don't think the people you are referring to are so much 'for the SNP' as 'for Nicola Sturgeon', as the two things are not quite the same thing.

alfaspecial

1,132 posts

141 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
marcella said:
Thanks for those that replied to my previous post, glad I'm not alone.

One thing that bothers me is that people I know that are 'for' the SNP have just seen the recent scandal of NS as the tories trying to get her kicked out. I can't believe that they cannot see she's in the wrong and yesterdays trial was an embarrassment (and not just for NS).

The other thing that bothers me slightly is I keep hearing from the rest of the UK on why we are idiots for wanting independence but I haven't heard them actually saying why they want to keep us. It would be nice to hear a bit more from the English especially on why they want us to remain and not bashing us for always putting our hands out and taking all 'their' money.
I'm English but also British and I think we would all be a lot poorer (not in the financial sense!) if we were to break up.
As Great Britain (UK), we have (usually) been pretty successful in ever sense and to have rivalries between constituent parts would be madness.
Taking independence to it's logical conclusion why shouldn't a post UK Scotland be 'broken up' - independence for the Sheltlands, say.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Scottish_borde...
Remember all the Remainiac delaying and trying to deny the result of the EU referendum ...... Gina Miller & Co. Imagine all those shenanigans x1000!




To be honest, I don't think it will be allowed to happen, short of invasion by a third party......

The Act of Union (1707) is quite clear....
Article 1 states "That the Two Kingdoms of Scotland and England, shall upon the 1st May next ensuing the date hereof, and forever after, be United into One Kingdom by the Name of Great Britain."


So tough.


WackyWeaver

53 posts

39 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Apparently SNP membership has increased by 5000 since yesterday.


paulrockliffe

15,721 posts

228 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
technodup said:
hidetheelephants said:
he SNP and some indy supporters do not want devomax or a federal settlement because they fear such a thing would significantly reduce any chance of full independence.
Devolution was supposed to reduce the chance of independence.

It increased massively.
That may be, however they don't want it and argue against it consistently. Devomax is moot as there are large areas of legislative/executive power allocated to ScotGov which have not been taken up because they're feartie bawbags. A federal settlement would go some way to solving the Tam Dalzell Question and other easter eggs hidden in the undergrowth by Donald Dewar.
Devolution has lead to two things - more support for Scottish independence in Scotland and more support for Scottish independence in England. More devolution would mean even less support for the Union in England. I don't mean politicians who can't be seen to be anything other than unionists, but with voters who just see that they're paying for another extra bunch of politicians whose only contribution is to complain about the English, either in Scotland or in Westminster.

Would anyone really shed a tear if the likes of Ian Blackford were no longer wasting the Government's time every week? That's a very simple view, but the concept of not having to hear Scots say how terrible the English are all the time has solid traction.

I'd think the majority view in England is either stop voting for the SNP and engage with the rest of the UK constructively or off you pop.

Leithen

10,941 posts

268 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
WackyWeaver said:
Apparently SNP membership has increased by 5000 since yesterday.
rofl

Evercross

6,015 posts

65 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
WackyWeaver said:
Apparently SNP membership has increased by 5000 since yesterday.
Are you sure it wasn't 7000?

Roderick Spode

3,114 posts

50 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
WackyWeaver said:
Apparently SNP membership has increased by 5000 since yesterday.
'Apparently' indeed.

Wings Over Bath said:
The idea that 7000 people suddenly joined the SNP last night on the strength of Nicola Sturgeon’s hollow bravura acting performance in front of the Fabiani inquiry is of course a complete and utter nonsense. It has no source and no evidence – we can’t find a single official SNP representative making the claim anywhere – and appears to have simply been plucked from thin air by a clutch of highly questionable accounts.

The SNP’s astroturfing operation has long been an embarrassment, but last night it hardly even bothered making the effort. A handful of accounts with 23 followers and six tweets in five years all announced they’d joined the party – just barely enough for MPs and activists to have several to retweet – and a scattered few punted the “7000” figure (along with the one poor sap who’d been fed the “10%” line instead) for the same reason, and lo and behold there was a handy distracting narrative.
https://wingsoverscotland.com/the-state-of-scotlan...

WackyWeaver

53 posts

39 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Roderick Spode said:
‘It has no source and no evidence – we can’t find a single official SNP representative making the claim anywhere – and appears to have simply been plucked from thin air by a clutch of highly questionable accounts’

No source except for Keith Brown, SNP campaign director and according to his Twitter it is indeed 5000, not 7000 (then again they could still be increasing).


Quisling

539 posts

40 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Evercross said:
WackyWeaver said:
Apparently SNP membership has increased by 5000 since yesterday.
Are you sure it wasn't 7000?
GOOD NEWS

After being seconded across to the USA for the trump rallies

The guy who did the counting for the AUOB (all under one braincell) marches is BACK in scotland

And is doing SNP membership numbers

Evercross

6,015 posts

65 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Roderick Spode said:
WackyWeaver said:
Apparently SNP membership has increased by 5000 since yesterday.
'Apparently' indeed.
Indeed.

I did once suspect Lim of possibly being Ross Colquhoun ("Twitter is everything") but I have acquired a new-found respect for Lim because of his (some admittedly deleted) Damascene moments during the last few weeks while I have been observing from the sidelines (and he even said he missed me beer).

So I now know for sure that Lim is too intelligent and could not be behind the most cack-handed attempts of recent days to get pro-Nicola hashtags trending. What with previously unheard-of alleged Scottish Government female employees all tweeting the precise-same wording regarding Alex Salmond's alleged behaviour, and now another bunch of zombie accounts all using exactly the same wording to declare how honourable Nicola is having known her since the age of 16.

Fake news SNP central, and it is so transparent it is tedious.

Edited by Evercross on Thursday 4th March 15:31

hidetheelephants

24,483 posts

194 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
WackyWeaver said:
Apparently SNP membership has increased by 5000 since yesterday.

Monsterlime

1,206 posts

167 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
paulrockliffe said:
hidetheelephants said:
technodup said:
hidetheelephants said:
he SNP and some indy supporters do not want devomax or a federal settlement because they fear such a thing would significantly reduce any chance of full independence.
Devolution was supposed to reduce the chance of independence.

It increased massively.
That may be, however they don't want it and argue against it consistently. Devomax is moot as there are large areas of legislative/executive power allocated to ScotGov which have not been taken up because they're feartie bawbags. A federal settlement would go some way to solving the Tam Dalzell Question and other easter eggs hidden in the undergrowth by Donald Dewar.
Devolution has lead to two things - more support for Scottish independence in Scotland and more support for Scottish independence in England. More devolution would mean even less support for the Union in England. I don't mean politicians who can't be seen to be anything other than unionists, but with voters who just see that they're paying for another extra bunch of politicians whose only contribution is to complain about the English, either in Scotland or in Westminster.

Would anyone really shed a tear if the likes of Ian Blackford were no longer wasting the Government's time every week? That's a very simple view, but the concept of not having to hear Scots say how terrible the English are all the time has solid traction.

I'd think the majority view in England is either stop voting for the SNP and engage with the rest of the UK constructively or off you pop.
This is largely the view my friends down south also have. Either, they don't care and have barely thought about it until I mention it, or are so sick of being blamed for all the ills of Scotland by the SNats that they would vote in favour of it.

Leithen

10,941 posts

268 months

Thursday 4th March 2021
quotequote all
Monsterlime said:
paulrockliffe said:
hidetheelephants said:
technodup said:
hidetheelephants said:
he SNP and some indy supporters do not want devomax or a federal settlement because they fear such a thing would significantly reduce any chance of full independence.
Devolution was supposed to reduce the chance of independence.

It increased massively.
That may be, however they don't want it and argue against it consistently. Devomax is moot as there are large areas of legislative/executive power allocated to ScotGov which have not been taken up because they're feartie bawbags. A federal settlement would go some way to solving the Tam Dalzell Question and other easter eggs hidden in the undergrowth by Donald Dewar.
Devolution has lead to two things - more support for Scottish independence in Scotland and more support for Scottish independence in England. More devolution would mean even less support for the Union in England. I don't mean politicians who can't be seen to be anything other than unionists, but with voters who just see that they're paying for another extra bunch of politicians whose only contribution is to complain about the English, either in Scotland or in Westminster.

Would anyone really shed a tear if the likes of Ian Blackford were no longer wasting the Government's time every week? That's a very simple view, but the concept of not having to hear Scots say how terrible the English are all the time has solid traction.

I'd think the majority view in England is either stop voting for the SNP and engage with the rest of the UK constructively or off you pop.
This is largely the view my friends down south also have. Either, they don't care and have barely thought about it until I mention it, or are so sick of being blamed for all the ills of Scotland by the SNats that they would vote in favour of it.
Which is of course why Blackford exists. Without such divisive self-declared simpletons and their ilk, most inhabitants of the UK would give no more thought to Scotland leaving than the Scots would Orkney telling Holyrood exactly how small everything was in and below its Central Belt.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED