Derek Chauvin Trial

Author
Discussion

un1corn

2,143 posts

138 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
AW111 said:
So is he a hero in your eyes?
Did I say that?

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
un1corn said:
AW111 said:
So is he a hero in your eyes?
Did I say that?
No, that's why I asked.

pb3000

11 posts

40 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
Ructions said:
But restricts his comments further due to not being able to speak further about it due to forthcoming legal issues. No hint of remorse.
Quite curiously he suggested that future disclosures could bring peace of mind to the Floyd family.

I really can't wrap my head around this. What could he possibly disclose at a later date that would bring peace of mind to the Floyd family?

I note with interest that some fringe elements on Social Media are calling for Trump to pardon Chauvin if he makes back to the White House. Somehow I doubt Trump would go there.

Edited by pb3000 on Saturday 26th June 14:53

N7GTX

7,874 posts

144 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
pb3000 said:
Ructions said:
But restricts his comments further due to not being able to speak further about it due to forthcoming legal issues. No hint of remorse.
Quite curiously he suggested that future disclosures could bring peace of mind to the Floyd family.

I really can't wrap my head around this. What could he possibly disclose at a later date that would bring peace of mind to the Floyd family?

I note with interest that some fringe elements on Social Media are calling for Trump to pardon Chauvin if he makes back to the White House. Somehow I doubt Trump would go there.

Edited by pb3000 on Saturday 26th June 14:53
The only thing I can think of is that he has some medical evidence that he believes will somehow exonerate him and, in his eyes, will show GF was dying anyway. He can't possibly challenge the CCTV/film so that doesn't leave a lot. confused

PaulWoof

1,612 posts

156 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
From my point of watching it, he seemed to be referencing to george floyds brothers victim statement,

George floyd's brother brought up that chauvin did not speak throughout the trial and he would like to hear why he did what he did and what his thoughts were at the time.

So when chauvin spoke at sentencing to me it seemed like that was what he was referring to, not evidence per say but a sort of explanation of why he has not spoken and that in the federal trial he plans to answer the things that george floyds brother had asked in the victim statement.

Randy Winkman

16,155 posts

190 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
N7GTX said:
pb3000 said:
Ructions said:
But restricts his comments further due to not being able to speak further about it due to forthcoming legal issues. No hint of remorse.
Quite curiously he suggested that future disclosures could bring peace of mind to the Floyd family.

I really can't wrap my head around this. What could he possibly disclose at a later date that would bring peace of mind to the Floyd family?

I note with interest that some fringe elements on Social Media are calling for Trump to pardon Chauvin if he makes back to the White House. Somehow I doubt Trump would go there.

Edited by pb3000 on Saturday 26th June 14:53
The only thing I can think of is that he has some medical evidence that he believes will somehow exonerate him and, in his eyes, will show GF was dying anyway. He can't possibly challenge the CCTV/film so that doesn't leave a lot. confused
A sort of assisted suicide defence. He was dying so I put him out of his misery.

Not having a go at you N7GTX, by the way. smile

Captain Raymond Holt

12,230 posts

195 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
un1corn said:
Captain Raymond Holt said:
A hero in the eyes of the prison staff
Not just the eyes of prison staff.
Oh don’t get me wrong, there’s loads of nut jobs around.

un1corn

2,143 posts

138 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
AW111 said:
No, that's why I asked.
I couldn't possibly comment.

paulguitar

23,484 posts

114 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
un1corn said:
AW111 said:
No, that's why I asked.
I couldn't possibly comment.
Why not?

N7GTX

7,874 posts

144 months

Saturday 26th June 2021
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
N7GTX said:
pb3000 said:
Ructions said:
But restricts his comments further due to not being able to speak further about it due to forthcoming legal issues. No hint of remorse.
Quite curiously he suggested that future disclosures could bring peace of mind to the Floyd family.

I really can't wrap my head around this. What could he possibly disclose at a later date that would bring peace of mind to the Floyd family?

I note with interest that some fringe elements on Social Media are calling for Trump to pardon Chauvin if he makes back to the White House. Somehow I doubt Trump would go there.

Edited by pb3000 on Saturday 26th June 14:53
The only thing I can think of is that he has some medical evidence that he believes will somehow exonerate him and, in his eyes, will show GF was dying anyway. He can't possibly challenge the CCTV/film so that doesn't leave a lot. confused
A sort of assisted suicide defence. He was dying so I put him out of his misery.

Not having a go at you N7GTX, by the way. smile
wink

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Sunday 27th June 2021
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
un1corn said:
AW111 said:
No, that's why I asked.
I couldn't possibly comment.
Why not?
Either troll or trumpette.

un1corn

2,143 posts

138 months

Sunday 27th June 2021
quotequote all
AW111 said:
Either troll or trumpette.
Chill out bro, take some fentanyl.

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Sunday 27th June 2021
quotequote all
un1corn said:
Chill out bro, take some fentanyl.
I note you still haven't answered a simple question.

ps I'm on endone & morphine right now, but thanks for the advice.

Now : will you answer the question, or keep trollishly dodging it?

Touring442

3,096 posts

210 months

Sunday 27th June 2021
quotequote all
AW111 said:
un1corn said:
Captain Raymond Holt said:
A hero in the eyes of the prison staff
Not just the eyes of prison staff.
So is he a hero in your eyes?
laugh

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Sunday 27th June 2021
quotequote all
Touring442 said:
AW111 said:
un1corn said:
Captain Raymond Holt said:
A hero in the eyes of the prison staff
Not just the eyes of prison staff.
So is he a hero in your eyes?
laugh
Having read some of un1corn's posts on other threads, the answer is pretty fking obviously yes, but he's too gutless a troll to say so.

paulguitar

23,484 posts

114 months

Sunday 27th June 2021
quotequote all
AW111 said:
Touring442 said:
AW111 said:
un1corn said:
Captain Raymond Holt said:
A hero in the eyes of the prison staff
Not just the eyes of prison staff.
So is he a hero in your eyes?
laugh
Having read some of un1corn's posts on other threads, the answer is pretty fking obviously yes, but he's too gutless a troll to say so.
It's pretty surreal that this PH'er has been given an opportunity to say they do not consider Derek Chauvin a 'hero' but appear to have declined to say so.

Too spineless to actually say it.

bitchstewie

51,313 posts

211 months

Sunday 27th June 2021
quotequote all
I may be jumping in a bit late here so apologies if I've missed something but why on earth would he be a hero to the Prison staff? confused

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Sunday 27th June 2021
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
I may be jumping in a bit late here so apologies if I've missed something but why on earth would he be a hero to the Prison staff? confused
In un1corn's police state fantasies, he, along with anyone in uniform, is happy to see criminals killed by police without trial.


pb3000

11 posts

40 months

Sunday 27th June 2021
quotequote all
PaulWoof said:
From my point of watching it, he seemed to be referencing to george floyds brothers victim statement,

George floyd's brother brought up that chauvin did not speak throughout the trial and he would like to hear why he did what he did and what his thoughts were at the time.

So when chauvin spoke at sentencing to me it seemed like that was what he was referring to, not evidence per say but a sort of explanation of why he has not spoken and that in the federal trial he plans to answer the things that george floyds brother had asked in the victim statement.
+1

This makes perfect sense.