Boris Johnson- Prime Minister (Vol. 7)
Discussion
El stovey said:
IroningMan said:
I wonder what our resident Johnson champions think he should do about Hancock?
Presumably they'll wait until he's done something, and then tell us that whatever it was is the right thing.
Presumably they'll wait until he's done something, and then tell us that whatever it was is the right thing.
And not Boris’s fault in any way for appointing him in the first place or not getting rid of him earlier.
pquinn said:
vonuber said:
Garvin said:
What more leadership do you want? Boris has set a clear example and his Ministers are following
And now declares he has full confidence in him.I'm sure his supporters on here are delighted at such firm leadership.
Garvin said:
APontus said:
Are we going to see some leadership from Boris, or has he got lost in the fridge?
What more leadership do you want? Boris has set a clear example and his Ministers are following You have a minister in charge of what is currently the most vital public service. We already know Boris thinks his Health Minister is 'hopeless' and has had to take responsibility for pretty much everything away from him. Last year we saw how damaging to public morale and compliance when Cummings flouted the restrictions. Now Hancock, the man who is 'useless', has flouted his own regulations, in work time, with a colleague, who he appointed following a personal connection, and been found out very publicly.
I can't see the logic, any logic (assuming your goal is a functioning health service and compliance by the public) in keeping Hancock in-post.
Can anybody else reason why a PM would keep an incompetent dishonest cretin in charge of our health service right now?
APontus said:
Unbelievable.
You have a minister in charge of what is currently the most vital public service. We already know Boris thinks his Health Minister is 'hopeless' and has had to take responsibility for pretty much everything away from him. Last year we saw how damaging to public morale and compliance when Cummings flouted the restrictions. Now Hancock, the man who is 'useless', has flouted his own regulations, in work time, with a colleague, who he appointed following a personal connection, and been found out very publicly.
I can't see the logic, any logic (assuming your goal is a functioning health service and compliance by the public) in keeping Hancock in-post.
Can anybody else reason why a PM would keep an incompetent dishonest cretin in charge of our health service right now?
I think you’re ignoring the world beating vaccine rollout and the amazing track and trace app. Without Matty neither would have been possible and thankfully we have Bozza who can see Matty’s undeniable potential and value. You have a minister in charge of what is currently the most vital public service. We already know Boris thinks his Health Minister is 'hopeless' and has had to take responsibility for pretty much everything away from him. Last year we saw how damaging to public morale and compliance when Cummings flouted the restrictions. Now Hancock, the man who is 'useless', has flouted his own regulations, in work time, with a colleague, who he appointed following a personal connection, and been found out very publicly.
I can't see the logic, any logic (assuming your goal is a functioning health service and compliance by the public) in keeping Hancock in-post.
Can anybody else reason why a PM would keep an incompetent dishonest cretin in charge of our health service right now?
Unknown_User said:
APontus said:
Unbelievable.
You have a minister in charge of what is currently the most vital public service. We already know Boris thinks his Health Minister is 'hopeless' and has had to take responsibility for pretty much everything away from him. Last year we saw how damaging to public morale and compliance when Cummings flouted the restrictions. Now Hancock, the man who is 'useless', has flouted his own regulations, in work time, with a colleague, who he appointed following a personal connection, and been found out very publicly.
I can't see the logic, any logic (assuming your goal is a functioning health service and compliance by the public) in keeping Hancock in-post.
Can anybody else reason why a PM would keep an incompetent dishonest cretin in charge of our health service right now?
I think you’re ignoring the world beating vaccine rollout and the amazing track and trace app. Without Matty neither would have been possible and thankfully we have Bozza who can see Matty’s undeniable potential and value. You have a minister in charge of what is currently the most vital public service. We already know Boris thinks his Health Minister is 'hopeless' and has had to take responsibility for pretty much everything away from him. Last year we saw how damaging to public morale and compliance when Cummings flouted the restrictions. Now Hancock, the man who is 'useless', has flouted his own regulations, in work time, with a colleague, who he appointed following a personal connection, and been found out very publicly.
I can't see the logic, any logic (assuming your goal is a functioning health service and compliance by the public) in keeping Hancock in-post.
Can anybody else reason why a PM would keep an incompetent dishonest cretin in charge of our health service right now?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff