Ghislaine Maxwell trial

Author
Discussion

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
GT3Manthey said:
Welshbeef said:
Pilot didn’t see any under age girls
Pilot didn’t see any sexual behaviour
Pilot didn’t see any sexual acts with underage girls or boys.

(Possibly as he was flying the plane for some of the time)
Pilot confirms he flew Prince Andrew & Virginia Robert’s but has he said he flew them at the same time ?
I’ve not heard that been said either way. However the prosecution are not calling Virginia as a witness? Wonder why not?

Bill Clinton Donald trump (grab me by the pussy) Kevin Spacey

Actually wasn’t the Pedos setup strictly girls only - in which case unless Kevin S is/was Bi sexual he wouldn’t have any interest in the ladies would he.


LazyMechanic

493 posts

32 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
Stigproducts said:
I listened to a podcast, probably a couple of years ago, called "Truth and Lies" regarding Epstein. Some woman, last name Farmer, explained how Epstein gave her a job and somewhere to live and paid for her education. At one point he tried it on with her (she was over 18 at the time), she said no, he left. That was it... That was her side of the story, no rebuttal, that was the amazing "abuse" I had been led to believe was the center of the story. I will still waiting for the juicy bit when they wrapped up the season.

At one point the woman explained about how after all this terrible exploitation was over, she got her sister a job with him and she was worried about her because Epstein might try and hold her hand too, but she struggled to, because she was on an exchange trip in Italy for a semester THAT HE PAID FOR. He paid for the trip and she went even though he was a massive pedo and stuff and she still took it and got her sister a job and the OMG moment was she couldn't warn her sister about him. I genuinely felt at the end that the real story was that a sad horny deluded old man had been exploited by a couple of cock teases.

So that's the poster girl?

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/truth-and-li...


So she is clearly a money grabbing lying media we IMO. That's not to say some genuine victims who have some standards and haven't already sold out to the press won't appear at this trial. I await the evidence with interest, but prior to this point other than this Farmer woman, all I have seen are prostitutes who consented to an exchange of services in return for money/travel/gifts and are still trying to milk it for every penny.
You're one those who think love should not discriminate by age don't you?

He was having sex with children. So feck off with your excuses for him.


XCP

16,941 posts

229 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
It seems some can't distinguish between fact and fiction.

RB Will

9,666 posts

241 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
Can I just clarify, for my own education?
When we are saying he and his mates were pedos banging kids / children we are not talking like proper children as in pre teen / infants?
More the young adult range of mid to late teen, that would be above the age of consent for probably the majority of earths population?


Byker28i

Original Poster:

60,170 posts

218 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
GT3Manthey said:
Welshbeef said:
Pilot didn’t see any under age girls
Pilot didn’t see any sexual behaviour
Pilot didn’t see any sexual acts with underage girls or boys.

(Possibly as he was flying the plane for some of the time)
Pilot confirms he flew Prince Andrew & Virginia Robert’s but has he said he flew them at the same time ?
You know the flights and logs were all disclosed. Feel free to check but she was on a lot of the flights as his number two
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1507315-ep...
https://www.businessinsider.com/faa-accidentally-r...

We know another of Epsteins pilots David Rodgers, confirmed previously that Andrew was on board with Virginia Roberts

GT3Manthey

4,524 posts

50 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
Byker28i said:
You know the flights and logs were all disclosed. Feel free to check but she was on a lot of the flights as his number two
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1507315-ep...
https://www.businessinsider.com/faa-accidentally-r...

We know another of Epsteins pilots David Rodgers, confirmed previously that Andrew was on board with Virginia Roberts
Cool Tks

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
Oof

RedWhiteMonkey

6,861 posts

183 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
You lot are bonkers. What is the relevance of Allah to this trial? Are people really looking for some form of defence based on that? If so, based on that logic, what the Ancient Greeks and Romans used to get up to with kids must obviously set a clear precedent. Joking aside, it would be funny to hear Maxwell's defence team use Allah's antics as the basis of their defence case.

mick987

1,263 posts

111 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
What I don't understand is why Roberts is not in the dock with Maxwell as she has admitted to recruiting girls for Epstein.

dasigty

587 posts

82 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
There should be quite a lot not to understand starting with the prosecutor, who besides being the one who was running the show when someone "Accidentally deleted" the tapes of Epsteins prison cell is also the daughter of James Comey (Former head of the very same FBI who did not look into the countless complains over the years). Then maybe why the judge has already censored evidence as too upsetting for the general public in a land where nothing is usually off limits or why the other co defendants charged with the same thing are not involved with this trial.

This has the democrat party machine fingerprints all over it as a done deal so she will not name names,

Al Gorithum

3,741 posts

209 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
dasigty said:
This has the democrat party machine fingerprints all over it as a done deal so she will not name names,
Even though it's Trump most likely to be in trouble?


bitchstewie

51,447 posts

211 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
RedWhiteMonkey said:
You lot are bonkers. What is the relevance of Allah to this trial? Are people really looking for some form of defence based on that? If so, based on that logic, what the Ancient Greeks and Romans used to get up to with kids must obviously set a clear precedent. Joking aside, it would be funny to hear Maxwell's defence team use Allah's antics as the basis of their defence case.
Nail on head.

It's fking weird.

Digga

40,354 posts

284 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
Al Gorithum said:
dasigty said:
This has the democrat party machine fingerprints all over it as a done deal so she will not name names,
Even though it's Trump most likely to be in trouble?
How d'you work that out? I mean sure, he's not totally isolated from problems, but he's far from the most implicated and at least there appears to be some record of his severing ties with Epstein. Clinton on the other hand...

deckster

9,630 posts

256 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
Digga said:
Al Gorithum said:
dasigty said:
This has the democrat party machine fingerprints all over it as a done deal so she will not name names,
Even though it's Trump most likely to be in trouble?
How d'you work that out? I mean sure, he's not totally isolated from problems, but he's far from the most implicated and at least there appears to be some record of his severing ties with Epstein. Clinton on the other hand...
US party affiliations have about as much to do with this case as does Allah. It's not all about what colour placard you put in your front yard.

Al Gorithum

3,741 posts

209 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
Digga said:
Al Gorithum said:
dasigty said:
This has the democrat party machine fingerprints all over it as a done deal so she will not name names,
Even though it's Trump most likely to be in trouble?
How d'you work that out? I mean sure, he's not totally isolated from problems, but he's far from the most implicated and at least there appears to be some record of his severing ties with Epstein. Clinton on the other hand...
Who was POTUS when Epstein died? Who owned Mar a Lago when Epstein attended the owners parties there? Who wished Maxwell best wishes when she was arrested?



Gecko1978

9,739 posts

158 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
limpsfield said:
Welshbeef said:
LazyMechanic said:
You're one those who think love should not discriminate by age don't you?

He was having sex with children. So feck off with your excuses for him.
Didn’t a certain Muhammed married a 6 year old child Aisha Abu-Bakr & then consummated at 9 years of age.

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2...
made me laugh talking about Epstein a convicted white Peado and look there a Muslim lol. Epstein did some v bad things but not all people who cry fowl will have bene victims but some will have been else why plead guilty though his sentence was basically carry on with life as you are
Thanks for your, as ever, useful input

Digga

40,354 posts

284 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
deckster said:
Digga said:
Al Gorithum said:
dasigty said:
This has the democrat party machine fingerprints all over it as a done deal so she will not name names,
Even though it's Trump most likely to be in trouble?
How d'you work that out? I mean sure, he's not totally isolated from problems, but he's far from the most implicated and at least there appears to be some record of his severing ties with Epstein. Clinton on the other hand...
US party affiliations have about as much to do with this case as does Allah. It's not all about what colour placard you put in your front yard.
Agree. There would appear to be sufficient st to have all sides mired in it.

tangerine_sedge

4,803 posts

219 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
RedWhiteMonkey said:
You lot are bonkers. What is the relevance of Allah to this trial? Are people really looking for some form of defence based on that? If so, based on that logic, what the Ancient Greeks and Romans used to get up to with kids must obviously set a clear precedent. Joking aside, it would be funny to hear Maxwell's defence team use Allah's antics as the basis of their defence case.
Nail on head.

It's fking weird.
Nail on the head with a bigger hammer.

This thread has brought out all the usual weirdos with their pet prejudices and opinions.

I think the mods will be busy on this one for a while...

dasigty

587 posts

82 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
Al Gorithum said:
Even though it's Trump most likely to be in trouble?
You better do an update on straw clutching, The Donald threw his arse out of his club and cut ties long before the rumours became fact. What is fact is the pilots log listing Clinton and a host of other high profile democrats and donors, going back to Epsteins plead deal done by a democrat and the cover ups done under James Comey at the FBI who also pushed the democrat funded Russia hoax for all it was worth (Now a proven fake).

Yes there are some Republicans involved no doubt, but the smoke screen is being put up by democrats at every turn.

Al Gorithum

3,741 posts

209 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
dasigty said:
the democrat funded Russia hoax for all it was worth (Now a proven fake).
Oh dear. Cheerio.