UK asylum seekers expected to be flown to Rwanda

UK asylum seekers expected to be flown to Rwanda

Author
Discussion

frisbee

4,984 posts

111 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
The answer is pretty obvious: we stop speaking English and switch to French.

julian987R

6,840 posts

60 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
julianm said:
That earned the people smugglers £6.75 million (500 x av £13,500 smuggling fees).

Kowalski655

14,658 posts

144 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
It's not just crossing the channel that is an earner, it's across the Sahara, the Med, through Turkey from Iran and Iraq, across Europe generally

nickfrog

21,219 posts

218 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
Glad the mods have removed the very unsavoury posts of the past 24h.

There are posters with serious issues here and it's good they have been identified and dealt with.

Vipers

32,908 posts

229 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
Rwanda will never happen.

Rufus Stone

6,306 posts

57 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Rwanda will never happen.
Good.

julian987R

6,840 posts

60 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Rwanda will never happen.
They should just drop it all together. It is so badly thought through. Who actually came up with the idea in the first place?

blueg33

36,027 posts

225 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
julian987R said:
They should just drop it all together. It is so badly thought through. Who actually came up with the idea in the first place?
They should have dropped it two Home Secretaries ago. They have staked too much on it to give up now. The gammons must have their red meat.

jdw100

4,126 posts

165 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
blueg33 said:
The old “they are criminals “ trope. Debunked so many times I can’t believe you thought it was worth mentioning!
I guess the question is how many end up involved in petty crime, illegally working and debt to criminals because of the delays in the processing and inability to work/education whilst they wait.
Had a long conversation with a cab driver in south london a few years back.

Admitted working as an illegal driver ( via a friend with a firm) as waiting for asylum claim.

He was from Iran and was a doctor.

Now, I don’t know how Iranian doctor training rates against UK standards but surely he could have been given a chance to use skills in NHS, as a nurse or something?

Instead of receiving some pitiful benefits and working illegally.




blueg33

36,027 posts

225 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
jdw100 said:
Evanivitch said:
blueg33 said:
The old “they are criminals “ trope. Debunked so many times I can’t believe you thought it was worth mentioning!
I guess the question is how many end up involved in petty crime, illegally working and debt to criminals because of the delays in the processing and inability to work/education whilst they wait.
Had a long conversation with a cab driver in south london a few years back.

Admitted working as an illegal driver ( via a friend with a firm) as waiting for asylum claim.

He was from Iran and was a doctor.

Now, I don’t know how Iranian doctor training rates against UK standards but surely he could have been given a chance to use skills in NHS, as a nurse or something?

Instead of receiving some pitiful benefits and working illegally.
Indeed. We either need to process applications much faster or allow asylum seekers to work.

I would prefer the former.

shed driver

2,174 posts

161 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
£165,000 to sign a document. James Cleverly charters a private jet for the day to take himself, civil servants, his photographer and a BBC film crew to Kigali to sign the treaty back in December.

How many claims could be processed for that?

SD.

Rufus Stone

6,306 posts

57 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
shed driver said:
£165,000 to sign a document. James Cleverly charters a private jet for the day to take himself, civil servants, his photographer and a BBC film crew to Kigali to sign the treaty back in December.

How many claims could be processed for that?

SD.
What, no Docusign in Rwanda?

blueg33

36,027 posts

225 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
Rufus Stone said:
shed driver said:
£165,000 to sign a document. James Cleverly charters a private jet for the day to take himself, civil servants, his photographer and a BBC film crew to Kigali to sign the treaty back in December.

How many claims could be processed for that?

SD.
What, no Docusign in Rwanda?
Or it could have been done as counterparts if a wet ink signature was required.

biggbn

23,505 posts

221 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
julian987R said:
Vipers said:
Rwanda will never happen.
They should just drop it all together. It is so badly thought through. Who actually came up with the idea in the first place?
Signed off by Patel, announced by Johnson from memory. Dream team.

paulw123

3,242 posts

191 months

Friday 22nd March
quotequote all
julian987R said:
julianm said:
That earned the people smugglers £6.75 million (500 x av £13,500 smuggling fees).
How far from France do these small boats have to get before they get picked up by the larger ones and brought into Dover?

Surely setting up a processing centre in France run by the UK would be a sensible place to return the boats occupants to then process their claims.

fly by wire

3,228 posts

126 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
paulw123 said:
How far from France do these small boats have to get before they get picked up by the larger ones and brought into Dover?

Surely setting up a processing centre in France run by the UK would be a sensible place to return the boats occupants to then process their claims.
I seem to recall Sky News a while back filming the RNLI picking up illegals in French waters and bringing them back to the UK.

Shameful.

E63eeeeee...

3,916 posts

50 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
paulw123 said:
How far from France do these small boats have to get before they get picked up by the larger ones and brought into Dover?

Surely setting up a processing centre in France run by the UK would be a sensible place to return the boats occupants to then process their claims.
Don't be making sensible suggestions, this thread is for talking about stupid, performatively doomed ideas.

In theory the "border" is exactly half way across the channel. Of course both coasts are kind of wiggly and the water moves around, so I'd imagine "somewhere near the middle" would do the job. I'm fairly sure people on boats don't normally let imaginary lines stop them from preventing people drowning.

E63eeeeee...

3,916 posts

50 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
fly by wire said:
paulw123 said:
How far from France do these small boats have to get before they get picked up by the larger ones and brought into Dover?

Surely setting up a processing centre in France run by the UK would be a sensible place to return the boats occupants to then process their claims.
I seem to recall Sky News a while back filming the RNLI picking up illegals in French waters and bringing them back to the UK.

Shameful.
What's shameful about saving people from drowning? That's literally what people donate to the RNLI for.

Of course some people may make their donations conditional on the lifeboat captains ceding operational decisions to random knobs on the Internet instead of for example going to the nearest port where they can safely offload a bunch of people, or the safe port that gets them operational again soonest. Perhaps you'd have them run the lifeboat up the nearest French beach and ask the migrants nicely for a push back into the sea as they get off.

What is it that makes people so arrogant that they think their views should take precedence over actual fking lifeboat captains? Genuine question, please answer it as well as you can.

fly by wire

3,228 posts

126 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
E63eeeeee... said:
What's shameful about saving people from drowning? That's literally what people donate to the RNLI for.

Of course some people may make their donations conditional on the lifeboat captains ceding operational decisions to random knobs on the Internet instead of for example going to the nearest port where they can safely offload a bunch of people, or the safe port that gets them operational again soonest. Perhaps you'd have them run the lifeboat up the nearest French beach and ask the migrants nicely for a push back into the sea as they get off.

What is it that makes people so arrogant that they think their views should take precedence over actual fking lifeboat captains? Genuine question, please answer it as well as you can.
The point is that the RNLI are bringing undocumented people from French Territorial Waters into the UK, the fact that they may or may not require rescue is down to the French.

Is this so difficult to understand?

blueg33

36,027 posts

225 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
fly by wire said:
paulw123 said:
How far from France do these small boats have to get before they get picked up by the larger ones and brought into Dover?

Surely setting up a processing centre in France run by the UK would be a sensible place to return the boats occupants to then process their claims.
I seem to recall Sky News a while back filming the RNLI picking up illegals in French waters and bringing them back to the UK.

Shameful.
Saying it’s shameful that the RNLI rescues people is beyond shameful. It’s repugnant.