UK asylum seekers expected to be flown to Rwanda

UK asylum seekers expected to be flown to Rwanda

Author
Discussion

W124

1,542 posts

139 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
This is utterly tortuous.

The thing with the Rwanda plan is that it is not going to work. Because, simply put, it is not going to deter anybody. The numbers are so small, compared to the size of the issue, that nobody trying to get into the country illegally is going to give a flying fk about it. These people are not idiots. They can add up.

It won't work as a deterrent. It can't. It never will.

It doesn't matter whether one is pro or anti illegal/legal immigration - and to what extent. That is not the point.

It's just that this government has, badly advised as ever, nailed its colours to the mast. It cannot back down. Just say it to yourselves 'We are going to catch illegal immigrants and send them to Rwanda!'

Gibbering nonsense. We are right down the rabbit hole. Because nobody can argue one point without arguing another any more. It's perfectly reasonable to accept we have a problem with illegal immigration. And to do this without whataboutery concerning other countries that have it worse.

It's possible to also say that this Rwanda plan is absolute lunacy. Saying this does not equal 'I want to let everybody into the country forever' - It's simple - we have a problem - but this is a ghastly, idiotic, ineffective solution to it. And, furthermore, the government are doing it for reasons that have nothing at all to do with deterring migrants.

Batst.

reddiesel

1,964 posts

48 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
272BHP said:
It just shows how completely ineffective the French police are, that boat is now comically overloaded and the French police just stood around and watched it launch regardless.

There might be a strategy from the police to let them travel a little bit and then turn them back with the police vessels but I doubt it.

I would like to know what happens to this particular migrant boat.
They aren't ineffective , they are simply engaged in a game of pass the parcel with the final destination being the UK

Blue62

8,887 posts

153 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
ATG said:
President Merkin said:
Passing legislation that insists lies are truths is not what rational governments do, This law is peak Tory, eye wateringly expensive legislation rooted in an untruth forced onto the statute book by mediocre people.

Fully expect the usual crowd to tell me to cry harder or something but it's ok, I'm content in the knowledge I would never debase myself to the point of supporting a law that deports desperate people to an unsafe country.
Quite.

The utter stupidity of passing this law is that they now have to try to make it work. The curtain is being pulled back. Michael Tomlinson (the minister for illegal migration, no less) has just made a fool of himself on the Today programme because he is completely incapable of explaining how the policy actually delivers anything useful. He was simply asked "now that you've passed this law, how are you going to use it?" He couldn't even answer that. He spoke faster and faster to try to fill the intellectual vacuum and ended up saying "becoz Labour."

At what stage do their final few supporters throw in the towel and accept that the Conservatives have done nothing but bluff for the last 8 years?
Tomlinson is yet another cannon fodder minister set up to face off the media on what is a ridiculous bill, costs, energy, time and toil all completely out of proportion with what is effectively a drop in the ocean when it comes to the issue of immigration. Labour will rightly reverse it when in office, what a hideous bunch we have running the country right now.

croyde

22,964 posts

231 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
I really can't believe that this version of Ground Hog day is still carrying on, and to such a ludicrous cost to the tax payer.

Even if they succeed, a plane only seats maybe 200, so many flights a day, 7 days a week?

The idea is just nuts and I can't believe even Sunak thinks it's workable yet he seems to think he has to continue, at any price.

Come On Richi! you stopped HS2 for good or bad, so stop this utter nonsense.....NOW!

abzmike

8,404 posts

107 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
valiant said:
bhstewie said:
£500M so far isn't it?

Wonder what the next excuse will be.
Apparently they’ve also found thousands of hours worth of court time, hundreds of judges to sit in these cases and other legal staff to administer it.

Must be comforting to those waiting for justice for sometimes over a year because of cuts to the justice system that resources can be found when it’s expedient for political aims…
My thought exactly - Criminal justice system in meltdown, serious cases taking years to reach trial, less serious but still troubling crimes being dropped, and now seeming vast resources are immediatley avialable. 500 Home Office staff trained... But priorities... the most important issue facing the country... apparently.

President Merkin

3,040 posts

20 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
reddiesel said:
272BHP said:
You and people who think like you really are part of the problem.
I 100% agree with that summation .
I'm relaxed about that. If you want to swallow a diet of lies from the Mail & the Express, that's your business but not only are they lying to you, so is the Government that had to pass a law insisting a country where the president scores 99% of the vote is a safe place. I could never be that supine, ymmv.

captain_cynic

12,058 posts

96 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
reddiesel said:
272BHP said:
You and people who think like you really are part of the problem.
I 100% agree with that summation .
And the "problem" is a complete fabrication made to please people who struggle to live in reality and distract them from real issues that are actually affecting lives.

So I really don't care if I'm part of an imaginary problem because you're a cause of quite real ones.

Superflow

1,399 posts

133 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Interesting development that this is now law.

Have to say as a traditional conservative voter not planning on voting if they can fill up planes to Rwanda with economic migrants clutching their iPhones and also bring in the benefits time cap for the scroungers then they may swing me back to ticking their box.

Time will tell.

Mr Penguin

1,237 posts

40 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
The Rwanda policy is a complete waste of money but today brings another reminder of why there needs to be a deterrent on crossing the channel illegally https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/five-migrants-f...


Biggy Stardust

6,924 posts

45 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Mr Penguin said:
The Rwanda policy is a complete waste of money but today brings another reminder of why there needs to be a deterrent on crossing the channel illegally https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/five-migrants-f...
If risk of death doesn't deter them then what do you think will?

W124

1,542 posts

139 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Nothing will. That is the reality. Accept it or not.

Rivenink

3,686 posts

107 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
So have the Tories announced they've awarded a lucrative contract to fly asylum seekers to Rwanda to a Tory Donor who doesn't have any planes?

Mr Penguin

1,237 posts

40 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Biggy Stardust said:
If risk of death doesn't deter them then what do you think will?
Guaranteed being made to live in Sunderland

s1962a

5,344 posts

163 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Rivenink said:
So have the Tories announced they've awarded a lucrative contract to fly asylum seekers to Rwanda to a Tory Donor who doesn't have any planes?
It'll cost £1.8m per person to fly them out (for the first 300), so a good payday for the "chums" that get selected to run the scheme.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/01/rw...


Rufus Stone

6,277 posts

57 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Superflow said:
Interesting development that this is now law.

Have to say as a traditional conservative voter not planning on voting if they can fill up planes to Rwanda with economic migrants clutching their iPhones and also bring in the benefits time cap for the scroungers then they may swing me back to ticking their box.

Time will tell.
Good God. The depths to which Tory supporters have fallen.

mwstewart

7,618 posts

189 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
I wonder how many will be back on the next boat.

robinessex

11,062 posts

182 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
s1962a said:
Rivenink said:
So have the Tories announced they've awarded a lucrative contract to fly asylum seekers to Rwanda to a Tory Donor who doesn't have any planes?
It'll cost £1.8m per person to fly them out (for the first 300), so a good payday for the "chums" that get selected to run the scheme.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/01/rw...
36,704 illegal immigrants entered the UK in 2023, thus at £1.8 million per immigrant, if we'd sent them all to Rowada, the total cost to UK TAXPAYERS WOULD'VE BEEN £36 billion pounds.

rscott

14,762 posts

192 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
s1962a said:
Rivenink said:
So have the Tories announced they've awarded a lucrative contract to fly asylum seekers to Rwanda to a Tory Donor who doesn't have any planes?
It'll cost £1.8m per person to fly them out (for the first 300), so a good payday for the "chums" that get selected to run the scheme.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/01/rw...
We have around 50,000 people who have arrived since the law preventing them from applying for asylum was introduced. The options for them are either to send to Rwanda or keep paying to keep them in hotels ..


Mr Penguin

1,237 posts

40 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
£1.8 million per person assumes only 300 go (one or two full planes), if the policy takes off then that cost will reduce.

ATG

20,613 posts

273 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
PRTVR said:
President Merkin said:
PRTVR said:
It was a civil question to the language you used because I struggle to see why they are desperate, they are safe in France, desperate for a hotel room and a new mobile phone ?
I know you struggle, Your own language in the quoted post proves it. I felt bad for describing you as ignorant, then you said safe France, mobile phones, hotel rooms & proved it. So like I said, you could go away & read up on the complex & varied reasons why people choose to come here over somewhere else or alternativey trot out the lazy tropes above. You always have a choice.
So you think anyone who wants to come to the UK should be allowed ?
And your riposte is a transparent non sequitur. Well done.