Blackpool footballer comes out as gay
Discussion
Tyre Smoke said:
Randy Winkman said:
Tyre Smoke said:
Randy Winkman said:
JagLover said:
Tyre Smoke said:
Seriously? That's almost misogynistic.
It is an exaggeration but not far short of the truth. Women's football is likely of a similar standard to boys U15 due to the physical demands of the sport. That is why we have separate male and female sections in most sports.
I fully understand that men are stronger, it's nature. That is why we have male and female categories in all sports pretty much.
To clarify, my point was women's football is at a much higher standard than that. But perhaps that is part of the problem, men don't want to see that?
Tyre Smoke said:
Read my comment again. You have twisted it to suit your own agenda. I said almost misogynistic. To suggest that the cream of women's football would struggle to beat a county team of U16s is insulting. If women were so crap at it, why was there circa 50k at Wembley watching the FA Cup final?
I fully understand that men are stronger, it's nature. That is why we have male and female categories in all sports pretty much.
To clarify, my point was women's football is at a much higher standard than that. But perhaps that is part of the problem, men don't want to see that?
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-under-15-boys-squad-beat-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/I fully understand that men are stronger, it's nature. That is why we have male and female categories in all sports pretty much.
To clarify, my point was women's football is at a much higher standard than that. But perhaps that is part of the problem, men don't want to see that?
272BHP said:
Tyre Smoke said:
Read my comment again. You have twisted it to suit your own agenda. I said almost misogynistic. To suggest that the cream of women's football would struggle to beat a county team of U16s is insulting. If women were so crap at it, why was there circa 50k at Wembley watching the FA Cup final?
I fully understand that men are stronger, it's nature. That is why we have male and female categories in all sports pretty much.
To clarify, my point was women's football is at a much higher standard than that. But perhaps that is part of the problem, men don't want to see that?
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-under-15-boys-squad-beat-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/I fully understand that men are stronger, it's nature. That is why we have male and female categories in all sports pretty much.
To clarify, my point was women's football is at a much higher standard than that. But perhaps that is part of the problem, men don't want to see that?
1000 Miglia said:
I see today a team mate of this fella has apologized for historic homophobic social media posts from about 10 years
ago .
no doubt a member of the gutter press spent a while looking for any posts to cause a ruck ....
ago .
no doubt a member of the gutter press spent a while looking for any posts to cause a ruck ....
It's a very strange thing to do even by gutter press standards. On the back of the news someone has felt the need to try and make a story, but have made themselves look bitter and nasty.
I can't quite understand the mentality of trying to find dirt on his teammate's after yesterday's news. To go back 10 years to pick up a 16/17 year old is desperate stuff.
The player's statement read well. Accepting they were wrong and he's been educated with his time playing football. I think it's a fair enough apology and not requiring further punishment.
272BHP said:
Tyre Smoke said:
Read my comment again. You have twisted it to suit your own agenda. I said almost misogynistic. To suggest that the cream of women's football would struggle to beat a county team of U16s is insulting. If women were so crap at it, why was there circa 50k at Wembley watching the FA Cup final?
I fully understand that men are stronger, it's nature. That is why we have male and female categories in all sports pretty much.
To clarify, my point was women's football is at a much higher standard than that. But perhaps that is part of the problem, men don't want to see that?
I fully understand that men are stronger, it's nature. That is why we have male and female categories in all sports pretty much.
To clarify, my point was women's football is at a much higher standard than that. But perhaps that is part of the problem, men don't want to see that?
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-...
Also:
https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/australi...
https://www.sportbible.com/football/athletic-club-...
https://www.sportbible.com/football/news-gremio-me...
https://www.thelocal.se/20130116/45646/
And there were 50k at Wembley because the most expensive ticket was £25 and for under 16's it was £2.50 a ticket.
Edited by KingNothing on Wednesday 18th May 16:53
This latest story seems relevant
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
JagLover said:
This latest story seems relevant
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
Why shouldn't football take a stand against homophobia or racism?
Why sweep issues under the carpet to stop issues developing? It's not really stopping issues developing. It's just trying to ignore the problem.
Driver101 said:
JagLover said:
This latest story seems relevant
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
Why shouldn't football take a stand against homophobia or racism?
JagLover said:
Driver101 said:
JagLover said:
This latest story seems relevant
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
Why shouldn't football take a stand against homophobia or racism?
Individual footballers making a stand against either issue as a matter of choice is to be welcomed. Political symbols were banned in the past to stop football being dragged into the political arena, no matter how worthy the cause.
JagLover said:
Driver101 said:
JagLover said:
This latest story seems relevant
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61492696
In the past political symbols were banned from Football, perhaps to stop issues like this developing. Now that rule is applied very inconsistently.
Why shouldn't football take a stand against homophobia or racism?
Individual footballers making a stand against either issue as a matter of choice is to be welcomed. Political symbols were banned in the past to stop football being dragged into the political arena, no matter how worthy the cause.
Depends if you view human rights as ‘political’.
The player in question can do what he likes, but surely PSG can too.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff