Rishi Sunak - Prime Minister
Discussion
Police to reassess claims Angela Rayner broke the law when living between two former council houses after Labour deputy says she did 'nothing wrong'
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/police-to-re...
Might be porridge for our Angie. I for one won't applaud it. I think a 200 hour community service order, repossession of her current home and a fine of 10K will be punishment enough.
My sources tell me that there is already a fever breaking out in Labour HQ if Angela is prosecuted or worse still banged up.
It's not just the fac t that Labour may lose it's best firebrand since Barbara Castle. It's the fac t that a new deputy leader (and possible deputy PM will need to be appointed.
MP's are worried that Sir Keir may have to consider such a pool of top talent that it will detract him from holding Rishi to account .
One MP made the point that if there was a sub deputy PM they could simply take over but there isn't.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/police-to-re...
Might be porridge for our Angie. I for one won't applaud it. I think a 200 hour community service order, repossession of her current home and a fine of 10K will be punishment enough.
My sources tell me that there is already a fever breaking out in Labour HQ if Angela is prosecuted or worse still banged up.
It's not just the fac t that Labour may lose it's best firebrand since Barbara Castle. It's the fac t that a new deputy leader (and possible deputy PM will need to be appointed.
MP's are worried that Sir Keir may have to consider such a pool of top talent that it will detract him from holding Rishi to account .
One MP made the point that if there was a sub deputy PM they could simply take over but there isn't.
anonymoususer said:
My sources tell me that there is already a fever breaking out in Labour HQ if Angela is prosecuted or worse still banged up.
You have to be a satire account, surely?! Which sources are these, and what makes you think she would be "banged up" even if they did find enough evidence to prosecute. It's a fairly minor offence.
Seasonal Hero said:
Are you honestly that stupid?
The idea that you don’t assess someone fully and if uncertain leave them for a professional at the age of 82 seems totally lost on you. But yeah, just chuck them in a cab when you have zero idea of the full injuries. It’s not an 18 year old we’re talking about here. Use your brain.
How you go from that to what you said is off the scale mental. Your posts are becoming increasingly unhinged. Some time offline is a good idea for you.
Your binary thinking skills are only trumped by your sensationalism. You either can't drive, have limited control of your faculties, are a bit risk averse, dim....or all of that. The idea that you don’t assess someone fully and if uncertain leave them for a professional at the age of 82 seems totally lost on you. But yeah, just chuck them in a cab when you have zero idea of the full injuries. It’s not an 18 year old we’re talking about here. Use your brain.
How you go from that to what you said is off the scale mental. Your posts are becoming increasingly unhinged. Some time offline is a good idea for you.
Incredibly my 86 year old father needed to get somewhere and I didn't take a sports car, strap him into the harness and proceed to set a new point to point record.
I guess you just don't have logic at your disposal.
carlo996 said:
Your binary thinking skills are only trumped by your sensationalism. You either can't drive, have limited control of your faculties, are a bit risk averse, dim....or all of that.
Incredibly my 86 year old father needed to get somewhere and I didn't take a sports car, strap him into the harness and proceed to set a new point to point record.
I guess you just don't have logic at your disposal.
Seriously. Log off for a while. You’re making yourself look more stupid than normal, and that’s a high bar with you. Incredibly my 86 year old father needed to get somewhere and I didn't take a sports car, strap him into the harness and proceed to set a new point to point record.
I guess you just don't have logic at your disposal.
Looks like Susan Hall is trying to distance herself from that bloody weird advert.
Controversial attack ad on Sadiq Khan made solely by Tory HQ, source says
Controversial attack ad on Sadiq Khan made solely by Tory HQ, source says
Have we had the Birmingham video yet? Equally weird, not sure what the ending is about, and fails to mention that the council is skint because of a £1bn equal pay claim which goes back a lot further than the current Labour council.
All in all, it's just.... odd...... Birmingham might not be great, but its not Gotham City either! Even if the Tories do take control at the elections there is nothing they can do about the financial state of the council or how it ended up there.
https://twitter.com/Conservatives/status/177267800...
All in all, it's just.... odd...... Birmingham might not be great, but its not Gotham City either! Even if the Tories do take control at the elections there is nothing they can do about the financial state of the council or how it ended up there.
https://twitter.com/Conservatives/status/177267800...
Seasonal Hero said:
768 said:
21%. Today. Under a Labour government.
Here you go:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-68669866
"Public satisfaction with the NHS has dropped again, setting a new low recorded by the long-running British Social Attitudes survey.
Just 24% said they were satisfied with the NHS in 2023, with waiting times and staff shortages the biggest concerns.
That is five percentage points down on last year and a drop from the 2010 high of 70% satisfaction.
The poll - the gold-standard measure of the public's view of the health service - has been running since 1983."
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff