Rishi Sunak - Prime Minister

[biggbn]

carlo996 said:

S600BSB said:

bhstewie said:

John Curtice has said it's 99% that the Conservatives lose the next election.

Come on man, who gives them a 1% chance! Curtice is a joke.

Not sure why it’s a question? What’s up for debate is how badly Labour* will fk things up?

• new new new

Can you fk up something that is totally fked up? If something is totally fked can it BE anymore fked?

[biggbn]

Rufus Stone said:

smn159 said:

Oh, well if they were merely incompetent for the first 5 years and only corrupt for the last 9, I guess that makes it OK ;

Not sure they were incompetent either. I thought the coalition was okay.

The rot started to set in post the referendum in my opinion.

I'd agree with this

[carlo996]

President Merkin said:

Everything this genius posts ever.

It’s ok, I wouldn’t expect someone like you to understand. You’ll likely be the first moaning at the incoming pain. But you’re too thick to comprehend these simple truths

[carlo996]

smn159 said:

We've had 14 years of the most incompetent and corrupt government ever and yet you're terrified of any change?

Dry your eyes mate and have a Google of Stockholm Syndrome - it might help you

Another one who doesn’t get it. There will be no change, it’s the same politics with a leader less credible than Boris Johnson FFS.

[President Merkin]

carlo996 said:

It’s ok, I wouldn’t expect someone like you to understand. You’ll likely be the first moaning at the incoming pain. But you’re too thick to comprehend these simple truths

Love it. Like being called fat by Lizzo.

[captain_cynic]

President Merkin said:

Love it. Like being called fat by Lizzo.

LoL...

It does take a special kind of ignorance to look at the current st show and decree that anyone else could possibly be worse.

[AW111]

Is it a rule that posters named after Porsche models have to post childishly stupid st every day, or is it just a lifestyle choice?

[abzmike]

AW111 said:

Is it a rule that posters named after Porsche models have to post childishly stupid st every day, or is it just a lifestyle choice?

There does seem to be a pattern…

[Seasonal Hero]

carlo996 said:

But you’re too thick to comprehend these simple truths

The irony klaxon needs to be louder for you.

[julian987R]

bhstewie said:

John Curtice has said it's 99% that the Conservatives lose the next election.

Considering local elections have a higher degree of protest voting then come May they are set to loose every single one of them.
I predict 100% local election wipe out and Rishi to stand down the following day.

[carlo996]

captain_cynic said:

LoL...

It does take a special kind of ignorance to look at the current st show and decree that anyone else could possibly be worse.

A cynic maybe?

[AmitG]

julian987R said:

Considering local elections have a higher degree of protest voting then come May they are set to loose every single one of them.
I predict 100% local election wipe out and Rishi to stand down the following day.

I don't think he will stand down following the local elections. It would throw the party into chaos and while he has many faults I don't think he is so ill-mannered as to leave behind that sort of carnage.

I think he will stay, go into the election, lose heavily and then go ASAP.

[carlo996]

AmitG said:

I don't think he will stand down following the local elections. It would throw the party into chaos and while he has many faults I don't think he is so ill-mannered as to leave behind that sort of carnage.

I think he will stay, go into the election, lose heavily and then go ASAP.

I can’t see he’ll hang about. He’s probably already got a number of corporates after him.

[abzmike]

carlo996 said:

AmitG said:

I don't think he will stand down following the local elections. It would throw the party into chaos and while he has many faults I don't think he is so ill-mannered as to leave behind that sort of carnage.

I think he will stay, go into the election, lose heavily and then go ASAP.

I can’t see he’ll hang about. He’s probably already got a number of corporates after him.

He’ll be on the lucrative speaking circuit, lecturing businesses about setting a small number of KPIs and delivering them… oh hang on…

[biggbn]

carlo996 said:

AmitG said:

I don't think he will stand down following the local elections. It would throw the party into chaos and while he has many faults I don't think he is so ill-mannered as to leave behind that sort of carnage.

I think he will stay, go into the election, lose heavily and then go ASAP.

I can’t see he’ll hang about. He’s probably already got a number of corporates after him.

Agreed Carlo, PM was just an incredible achievement of his CV. Will make him very bankable in almost any country he didn't have a hand in running....

[smn159]

carlo996 said:

I can’t see he’ll hang about. He’s probably already got a number of corporates after him.

the ones that set objectives and then run around saying how it's everyone else's fault that they don't meet them, presumably?

[carlo996]

biggbn said:

Agreed Carlo, PM was just an incredible achievement of his CV. Will make him very bankable in almost any country he didn't have a hand in running....

As always, it’s who you know….

See Nick Clegg, Tony Blair, Leon Brittan, Scargill, Johnson, etc. etc.

I recently endured a dinner with Ed Balls, a more odious and self serving piece of boredom would be difficult to meet. I think he picked up 10K for that little number?

They’re all bankable. Very bankable.

It’s who they know.

[anonymoususer]

biggbn said:

Rufus Stone said:

smn159 said:

Oh, well if they were merely incompetent for the first 5 years and only corrupt for the last 9, I guess that makes it OK ;

Not sure they were incompetent either. I thought the coalition was okay.

The rot started to set in post the referendum in my opinion.

I'd agree with this

Me too

[Boringvolvodriver]

anonymoususer said:

biggbn said:

Rufus Stone said:

smn159 said:

Oh, well if they were merely incompetent for the first 5 years and only corrupt for the last 9, I guess that makes it OK ;

Not sure they were incompetent either. I thought the coalition was okay.

The rot started to set in post the referendum in my opinion.

I'd agree with this

Me too

And another in agreement - I did have high hopes for the coalition at the start but it was ok. Better than what followed after DC caved into his right wing and offered a referendum expecting to be in coalition again and thus able to blame the LibDems for not having it……..

I still can’t understand why the Tory party put May(a remainer) in charge to try and deliver Brexit - it’s almost as if they knew it wouldn’t work.

[smn159]

Boringvolvodriver said:

I still can’t understand why the Tory party put May(a remainer) in charge to try and deliver Brexit - it’s almost as if they knew it wouldn’t work.

Likely because none of the Brexit lot ever expected to have to actually deliver it and no-one had any clue how to do it.