45th President Of The United States, Donald Trump (Vol. 14)

[Byker28i]

Even Fox News is now acknowledging trump’s weakness within the Republican Party. Nikki Haley continues to get a significant amount of votes despite dropping out months ago.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1783243109301641659

[Byker28i]

Todd Blanche is no longer representing Boris Epshteyn, after he was conflicted with defending trump.

[Byker28i]

trump also a co-conspirator in Michigans fake electors case
https://eu.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/202...

[Byker28i]

trump can't resist attacking Barr even after he endorsed him

[Byker28i]

Winsconsin roadside

[Byker28i]

One of those named in the Arizona fake electors is Jake Hoffman who ran Rally Forge, and ran Charlie Kirk’s social media accounts.

During the 2018 midterms, Turning Point USA’s troll farm, Rally Forge, set up a fake groups on Facebook to convince left wing voters in key races to support the Green Party rather than the Dems

This is Hoffman yesterday
https://twitter.com/i/status/1481427816113655815



And as Lara trump claims they'll have trumpettes involved in every stage of the ballots, watching, touching, the RNC's senior counsel for election integrity was indicted yesterday in Arizona for election conspiracy and fraud.

Edited by Byker28i on Thursday 25th April 06:54

[Byker28i]

Byker28i said:

Byker28i said:

Claims trump is flouting Federal laws, using a company Red Curve to pay trumps legal costs out of its corporate account, with trumps Pacs repaying the company later.
According to campaign finance experts, this setup appears to flout federal rules requiring the disclosure of vendors, with Red Curve’s advance payments also raising the prospect of corporate in-kind contributions.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-new-legal-bil...

Payments from five trump PACs go to this entity, and are dubbed “legal reimbursements.” That’s the same scheme he’s on trial for right now

Nearly $8M dollars was paid to unknown people by this entity, and multiple trump PACs reimburse it. If they were just paying lawyers, why hide it? We see all kinds of trump legal bills. This feels like he’s using this entity to hide where the money is going

There's going to be a lot more to come from this

The FEC, in its entire documented history, has only recorded 252 legal reimbursement payments.
118 of those - almost half - came from Trump committees in the last 15 months.

The first 134 (not Donald’s) amounted to about $550,000.
Trump’s are over $8 million and counting.



A complaints been filed that trumps been illegally hiding payments
https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-complaint-allege...


Also this brings back into focus what happen to the Inauguration money that was misused, Weisselberg signed off, apparently Red Curve involved, Melania blamed Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, who fought back. Shes still annoyed at Maggie Habberman for pushing the trumps misdirection and false stories rather than checking the truth.
https://twitter.com/SWinstonWolkoff/status/1783219...

Edited by Byker28i on Thursday 25th April 06:42

[Byker28i]

Guess what.

After complaining that court was stopping him from campaigning, trump didn't go campaigning on his day off yesterday...

[Byker28i]

Trump attorney and former OAN talking person Christina Bobb says people will go to jail for election fraud if DePerno wins as Arizona AG: “If you get an AG like Matt DePerno, who’s hell-bent on prosecuting and making sure that people pay for what they did.”

How right she was
https://twitter.com/i/status/1510352223611535368

They have her giving an interview saying they have a plan for 3 states to decertify their results and send resolutions to the next Congress after the midterms to overturn the results.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1545560958524919817

[dobbo_]

EddieSteadyGo said:

This is poor. Where is dobbo_unleashed!?

I can't be drunk all the time

[Blackpuddin]

Byker28i said:

Entered into evidence, and many many more stories team trump wanted published

Edited by Byker28i on Thursday 25th April 06:53

Clever of them to bring in such credible evidence. Maybe the judge could look at some UFO claims from that source while he's at it.

[minimoog]

Blackpuddin said:

Clever of them to bring in such credible evidence. Maybe the judge could look at some UFO claims from that source while he's at it.

Are you saying Pecker's evidence isn't credible?

[RustyMX5]

EddieSteadyGo said:

"It isn’t political in any sense whatsoever"... you need to do more research... specifically the statements from those who have been ensuring the cases are prosecuted in the way they are.

As I say, if you want to turn a blind eye, I can't help you. That is NOT to say I think Trump is a 'good guy' or a good President or a moral person. But I think most people (who are more neutral than most contributors to this thread) will realise what a dangerous road they are on.

I'm curious to know where you've been able to find the evidence which supports this.

For the avoidance of doubt, I sit in the camp which says that despite everything that's been thrown at him, the jury(s) might not reach a unanimous agreement OR if found guilty he might end up with no more than a 'token punishment'. I also sit in the camp which says there's a moderate chance of him becoming president again. And finally, I don't believe every link which is posted up.

So, you have the opportunity to present your case because you certainly have one person who will listen.

[Blackpuddin]

minimoog said:

Blackpuddin said:

Clever of them to bring in such credible evidence. Maybe the judge could look at some UFO claims from that source while he's at it.

Are you saying Pecker's evidence isn't credible?

I think there's a world of difference between what he published in the NE to make money and what he is being obliged to say under oath as a human being (sort of). A role he was apparently struggling with on day two of his testimony.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/david-pecker-deflate...

[98elise]

EddieSteadyGo said:

paulguitar said:

....
Have you forgotten/overlooked, as just one example, that this fellow tried to end the democratic process in the US?

Which court concluded that?

That's not the definition attempting something.

Courts just decide if what you did is a crime.

[silentbrown]

Blackpuddin said:

Clever of them to bring in such credible evidence. Maybe the judge could look at some UFO claims from that source while he's at it.

It's credible evidence of the BS that Pecker was publishing to help Trump. And the Enquirer hasn't always peddled total BS... https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/17/opinions/nation...

[Blackpuddin]

silentbrown said:

Blackpuddin said:

Clever of them to bring in such credible evidence. Maybe the judge could look at some UFO claims from that source while he's at it.

It's credible evidence of the BS that Pecker was publishing to help Trump. And the Enquirer hasn't always peddled total BS... https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/17/opinions/nation...

I was being sarcastic.

[98elise]

RustyMX5 said:

EddieSteadyGo said:

"It isn’t political in any sense whatsoever"... you need to do more research... specifically the statements from those who have been ensuring the cases are prosecuted in the way they are.

As I say, if you want to turn a blind eye, I can't help you. That is NOT to say I think Trump is a 'good guy' or a good President or a moral person. But I think most people (who are more neutral than most contributors to this thread) will realise what a dangerous road they are on.

I'm curious to know where you've been able to find the evidence which supports this.

For the avoidance of doubt, I sit in the camp which says that despite everything that's been thrown at him, the jury(s) might not reach a unanimous agreement OR if found guilty he might end up with no more than a 'token punishment'. I also sit in the camp which says there's a moderate chance of him becoming president again. And finally, I don't believe every link which is posted up.

So, you have the opportunity to present your case because you certainly have one person who will listen.

I would be the same camp.

[satans worm]

For some light entertainment on the US politics (the first 2.30 is not on politics)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmkA6k8mASY

[Crafty_]

Couple of interesting op eds, he first one in particular sums up trump quite well

https://www.thedailybeast.com/before-trumps-big-li...

https://www.thedailybeast.com/in-court-donald-trum...