Reform UK - A symptom of all that is wrong?
Discussion
smn159 said:
crankedup5 said:
Reform U.K. will build a base from 2024 ready for 2029-30.
Support for Reform has doubled to 12% in the last year. Their support in 2029 based on this trend will be 192% of the electorate.Go back to your constituencies and prepare for government!
Dave200 said:
smn159 said:
crankedup5 said:
Reform U.K. will build a base from 2024 ready for 2029-30.
Support for Reform has doubled to 12% in the last year. Their support in 2029 based on this trend will be 192% of the electorate.Go back to your constituencies and prepare for government!
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
Killboy said:
So, let me get this right.
People voting for Labour are "fkwits", because while Labour has at least some substance in their manifesto they have a poor track record from ages ago.
But people voting for a party with meaningless manifestos that do not need to hold up scrutiny should not be considered just a little bit dim - because if they got in they'd somehow figure it out?
Reform U.K. will not form a Government this time around, we know this. However, the polling stats, such as they are, indicate a steady upward interest in Reform U.K. Being how poor their proposals are in their opponents view it really does demonstrate how poor the two major Parties offerings are. Labour have had years to form some interesting and dynamic proposals, and yet it seems their cupboard is bare. It really feels like a case of ‘we are not quite as poor as Tory’. People voting for Labour are "fkwits", because while Labour has at least some substance in their manifesto they have a poor track record from ages ago.
But people voting for a party with meaningless manifestos that do not need to hold up scrutiny should not be considered just a little bit dim - because if they got in they'd somehow figure it out?
Reform U.K. will build a base from 2024 ready for 2029-30.
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
Killboy said:
So, let me get this right.
People voting for Labour are "fkwits", because while Labour has at least some substance in their manifesto they have a poor track record from ages ago.
But people voting for a party with meaningless manifestos that do not need to hold up scrutiny should not be considered just a little bit dim - because if they got in they'd somehow figure it out?
Reform U.K. will not form a Government this time around, we know this. However, the polling stats, such as they are, indicate a steady upward interest in Reform U.K. Being how poor their proposals are in their opponents view it really does demonstrate how poor the two major Parties offerings are. Labour have had years to form some interesting and dynamic proposals, and yet it seems their cupboard is bare. It really feels like a case of ‘we are not quite as poor as Tory’. People voting for Labour are "fkwits", because while Labour has at least some substance in their manifesto they have a poor track record from ages ago.
But people voting for a party with meaningless manifestos that do not need to hold up scrutiny should not be considered just a little bit dim - because if they got in they'd somehow figure it out?
Reform U.K. will build a base from 2024 ready for 2029-30.
QuartzDad said:
crankedup5 said:
I was waiting to hear / read of the actual input from the interview, rather than the toxic misrepresentations presented earlier.
Clip is 5 minutes long.https://x.com/TalkTV/status/1782712172256096261
crankedup5 said:
QuartzDad said:
crankedup5 said:
I was waiting to hear / read of the actual input from the interview, rather than the toxic misrepresentations presented earlier.
Clip is 5 minutes long.https://x.com/TalkTV/status/1782712172256096261
Julia Hartley Brewer, "You would leave asylum seekers to drown in the channel?"
Ben Habib, "Absolutely"
crankedup5 said:
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
Killboy said:
So, let me get this right.
People voting for Labour are "fkwits", because while Labour has at least some substance in their manifesto they have a poor track record from ages ago.
But people voting for a party with meaningless manifestos that do not need to hold up scrutiny should not be considered just a little bit dim - because if they got in they'd somehow figure it out?
Reform U.K. will not form a Government this time around, we know this. However, the polling stats, such as they are, indicate a steady upward interest in Reform U.K. Being how poor their proposals are in their opponents view it really does demonstrate how poor the two major Parties offerings are. Labour have had years to form some interesting and dynamic proposals, and yet it seems their cupboard is bare. It really feels like a case of ‘we are not quite as poor as Tory’. People voting for Labour are "fkwits", because while Labour has at least some substance in their manifesto they have a poor track record from ages ago.
But people voting for a party with meaningless manifestos that do not need to hold up scrutiny should not be considered just a little bit dim - because if they got in they'd somehow figure it out?
Reform U.K. will build a base from 2024 ready for 2029-30.
crankedup5 said:
QuartzDad said:
crankedup5 said:
I was waiting to hear / read of the actual input from the interview, rather than the toxic misrepresentations presented earlier.
Clip is 5 minutes long.https://x.com/TalkTV/status/1782712172256096261
abzmike said:
crankedup5 said:
QuartzDad said:
crankedup5 said:
I was waiting to hear / read of the actual input from the interview, rather than the toxic misrepresentations presented earlier.
Clip is 5 minutes long.https://x.com/TalkTV/status/1782712172256096261
Julia Hartley Brewer, "You would leave asylum seekers to drown in the channel?"
Ben Habib, "Absolutely"
crankedup5 said:
QuartzDad said:
crankedup5 said:
I was waiting to hear / read of the actual input from the interview, rather than the toxic misrepresentations presented earlier.
Clip is 5 minutes long.https://x.com/TalkTV/status/1782712172256096261
or
The Co-Deputy Leader of Reform UK really is fine with letting migrants drown in the channel.
Which of those do you think is more likely Cranked?
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
S600BSB said:
smn159 said:
crankedup5 said:
Never say never, once the younger generation, those that haven’t lived through a Labour Government cycle, witness the complete lash up that the Labour loonies inflict upon the Country they will need a new Party to entrust, step forward Reform UK
Delusional.BNP / UKIP / Reform / Brexit Party or whatever they call themselves appeal to a specific demographic only
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
Dave200 said:
crankedup5 said:
Killboy said:
So, let me get this right.
People voting for Labour are "fkwits", because while Labour has at least some substance in their manifesto they have a poor track record from ages ago.
But people voting for a party with meaningless manifestos that do not need to hold up scrutiny should not be considered just a little bit dim - because if they got in they'd somehow figure it out?
Reform U.K. will not form a Government this time around, we know this. However, the polling stats, such as they are, indicate a steady upward interest in Reform U.K. Being how poor their proposals are in their opponents view it really does demonstrate how poor the two major Parties offerings are. Labour have had years to form some interesting and dynamic proposals, and yet it seems their cupboard is bare. It really feels like a case of ‘we are not quite as poor as Tory’. People voting for Labour are "fkwits", because while Labour has at least some substance in their manifesto they have a poor track record from ages ago.
But people voting for a party with meaningless manifestos that do not need to hold up scrutiny should not be considered just a little bit dim - because if they got in they'd somehow figure it out?
Reform U.K. will build a base from 2024 ready for 2029-30.
abzmike said:
Mr Habib appears in an interview virtually every day... Ms Hartley-Brewer is hardly a hostile interviewer for him. He has a smooth line of response and is never caught for words. He was very deliberate:
Julia Hartley Brewer, "You would leave asylum seekers to drown in the channel?"
Ben Habib, "Absolutely"
He's on record that he'd break the law and presumably expect the RNLI or others to break the law? At least they're saying the ghastly bits out loud I suppose.Julia Hartley Brewer, "You would leave asylum seekers to drown in the channel?"
Ben Habib, "Absolutely"
bhstewie said:
crankedup5 said:
QuartzDad said:
crankedup5 said:
I was waiting to hear / read of the actual input from the interview, rather than the toxic misrepresentations presented earlier.
Clip is 5 minutes long.https://x.com/TalkTV/status/1782712172256096261
or
The Co-Deputy Leader of Reform UK really is fine with letting migrants drown in the channel.
Which of those do you think is more likely Cranked?
hidetheelephants said:
abzmike said:
Mr Habib appears in an interview virtually every day... Ms Hartley-Brewer is hardly a hostile interviewer for him. He has a smooth line of response and is never caught for words. He was very deliberate:
Julia Hartley Brewer, "You would leave asylum seekers to drown in the channel?"
Ben Habib, "Absolutely"
He's on record that he'd break the law and presumably expect the RNLI or others to break the law? At least they're saying the ghastly bits out loud I suppose.Julia Hartley Brewer, "You would leave asylum seekers to drown in the channel?"
Ben Habib, "Absolutely"
Fortunately saner people do not buy into this far right rhetoric, resulting in a huge spike in RNLI donations by the silent majority
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/29/rnli...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff