Angela Rayner to face investigation?
Discussion
chemistry said:
bhstewie said:
The thing that makes me laugh is that she clearly shouldn't have called them scum and she was right to apologise for it.
But let's face it she's been proven to have been completely and utterly correct.
She just said the quiet part out loud.
Not your best post…But let's face it she's been proven to have been completely and utterly correct.
She just said the quiet part out loud.
popeyewhite said:
chemistry said:
bhstewie said:
The thing that makes me laugh is that she clearly shouldn't have called them scum and she was right to apologise for it.
But let's face it she's been proven to have been completely and utterly correct.
She just said the quiet part out loud.
Not your best post…But let's face it she's been proven to have been completely and utterly correct.
She just said the quiet part out loud.
No surprise at all.
chemistry said:
bhstewie said:
The thing that makes me laugh is that she clearly shouldn't have called them scum and she was right to apologise for it.
But let's face it she's been proven to have been completely and utterly correct.
She just said the quiet part out loud.
Not your best post…But let's face it she's been proven to have been completely and utterly correct.
She just said the quiet part out loud.
Edited by EddieSteadyGo on Thursday 18th April 23:17
turbobloke said:
popeyewhite said:
chemistry said:
bhstewie said:
The thing that makes me laugh is that she clearly shouldn't have called them scum and she was right to apologise for it.
But let's face it she's been proven to have been completely and utterly correct.
She just said the quiet part out loud.
Not your best post…But let's face it she's been proven to have been completely and utterly correct.
She just said the quiet part out loud.
No surprise at all.
As I mentioned at the time, property renovations were the only plausible answer when she made her comment about getting tax advice. More luck than judgement, but the primary residence stuff is an irrelevance if there is no gain after the renovations.
It would have been far easier to confirm this at the beginning.
It would have been far easier to confirm this at the beginning.
And there you have it.
Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
bhstewie said:
And there you have it.
Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
Yup. The same people on here who didn’t call out those calling her a prostitute and using other misogynistic terms. Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
Mr Penguin said:
Oakey said:
Someone posted a link earlier in the thread to the listing for the house. Would love to know what was renovated!
https://order-order.com/2024/04/18/rayner-claims-kitchen-renovation-offset-all-of-her-tax-liability/I am not convinced that the kitchen cost £23k.
Evolving on to - has she lied, where did the money come from, who did the work blah blah
blueg33 said:
bhstewie said:
And there you have it.
Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
Yup. The same people on here who didn’t call out those calling her a prostitute and using other misogynistic terms. Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
Legacywr said:
blueg33 said:
bhstewie said:
And there you have it.
Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
Yup. The same people on here who didn’t call out those calling her a prostitute and using other misogynistic terms. Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
Scum is shorter though and just as accurate.
p1stonhead said:
Change scum for incompetent narcissists, sexual deviants and sociopaths (the words of Dominic Cummings) if you want. A stopped clock and all that…
Scum is shorter though and just as accurate.
All parties seemingly as bad as each other, mix in tax evasion and widespread antisemitism. Scum is shorter though and just as accurate.
Evanivitch said:
bennno said:
His comments are 100% accurate, there is either no cgt as it was her main and only home, or there aren’t as she did material improvements to it to offset the gain whilst letting it out.
Needs to get her story clear.
Then there’s the question of electoral submissions that must align to whatever position is adopted.
Her story is clear, it was her main and only home.Needs to get her story clear.
Then there’s the question of electoral submissions that must align to whatever position is adopted.
It's also clear that there's motivation to falsely declare it, because she didn't avoid any CGT anyway.
bhstewie said:
And there you have it.
Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
If some of those posters didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all...Far more concerned with a word that she shouldn't have used than many of you appear to be with actual behaviours going from what I've seen from most of you.
Tell you what come back when you've got stuck in on the Menzies or Hester thread on how people are alleged to have behaved towards a 78 year old lady or Diane Abbott.
Countless other examples the past few years.
Not a word about the vile language used about Rayner on this thread.
When there's tumbleweed from many of you on that kind of behaviour spare me the "oh my god she said scum how dare she" fake indignation.
This story has been driven along entirely by the Daily Mail and fake outrage, whilst multiple Tory MP failings have come and gone with hardly a comment from our resident blue rosettes.
Baroque attacks said:
Rufus Stone said:
This thread is bizarre.
It is indeed.1. Your gang smells.
2. Your gang smells worse.
3. No, your gang smells worse because you've never once even acknowledged they're a bit whiffy.
4. Your Mum.
5. No! YOUR MUM!!!!
Footnote: "for the benefit of the tape, that was a joke."
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff