G20 attack cop, "comes forward"

G20 attack cop, "comes forward"

Author
Discussion

Puggit

48,439 posts

248 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
So why didn't the first post-mortem find evidence of the blow...?

ewenm

28,506 posts

245 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
Puggit said:
So why didn't the first post-mortem find evidence of the blow...?
Didn't it? May have found it and decided it was inconsequential. We (the public) just don't know.

911motorsport

7,251 posts

233 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
How does pushing a man to the ground in front of you stop him from impeding your progress? It doesn't. What it DOES do is serve as a visual threat to the more able protestors looking on, and I think this is why that cop did what he did.

I think the events that led up to this will determine whether his actions are excusable. CCTV, mobile phones and press photographers should be able to piece together a pretty detailed account of events. The route he travelled that day must be very well covered by CCTV.

Who will collate all that CCTV evidence?

chunkymonkey71

13,015 posts

198 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
Funny how things turn around isn't it?

Wasn't that long ago that the Pie and Piston was full of "G20 protesters. aholes. Get a job" etc...

Now the cops are the bad guys and the "protester" (one who is out causing trouble and straining our public services) is the good guy.

I'm not saying that either side is right. What I am saying is there are 3 sides to every story.

His side.
The Policemans side.
The truth.

Stop reading crap newpapers and make up your own opinons. Seems that so many people on here are sucked in by the media.


V6

3,764 posts

221 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
bigTee said:
The fkwit cop caused that mans death.

Manslaughter in my eyes.

Send the fker down.
Agreed.

triggersbroom

2,376 posts

204 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
bigTee said:
The fkwit cop probably contributed to that mans death.
EFA as you know it probably was the cause, but in a Court of Law cannot be proved one way or the other.

mcdjl

5,446 posts

195 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
I know from experience that shoving some one can easily cause them to lose their balance (from both ends of it). As the shove isn't very clear on TV is it possible that the shove was a hurry up and not intended to floor the guy at all...he does certainly appear to be deliberately walking slowly/annoyingly. Hitting him with the batton was certainly a bit extreme.

As for the heart attack that killed him, certainly very unlucky...bought on by the 'attack' or not he doesn't deserve to be dead.Who knows though, had he hurried up he may have had the heart attack in the middle of the crowd and one of the protesters now be getting the blame.
Excess force seems to be a reasonable charge..manslaughter a tad harsh...and no i'm not a cop.

911motorsport

7,251 posts

233 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
chunkymonkey71 said:
Funny how things turn around isn't it?

Wasn't that long ago that the Pie and Piston was full of "G20 protesters. aholes. Get a job" etc...

Now the cops are the bad guys and the "protester" (one who is out causing trouble and straining our public services) is the good guy.

I'm not saying that either side is right. What I am saying is there are 3 sides to every story.

His side.
The Policemans side.
The truth.

Stop reading crap newpapers and make up your own opinons. Seems that so many people on here are sucked in by the media.
He wasn't a protestor!

He was a newspaper seller who packed up for the day and was trying to make his way home. At some point he was turned back towards the crowd by the police i.e. they refused to let him through their line.

911motorsport

7,251 posts

233 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
jesta1865 said:
Is it just me, or does that BBC clip appear to be of lower grade than it was yesterday? I'm quite sure it was clearer than that previously :tinfoilhat:

FoolOnTheHill

1,018 posts

211 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
This thread should be in News and Events.

Which perfectly illustrates how not needed the recent PH changes were.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

249 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
V6 said:
bigTee said:
The fkwit cop caused that mans death.

Manslaughter in my eyes.

Send the fker down.
Agreed.
how have you become in posession of all the facts?

rasputin

1,449 posts

206 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
isee said:
rasputin said:
I see there's a new addition to the list.

"I don't care how much education you've had, how many years of on the job training and years of experience you've got, I can still do your job better than you":

Psychology
Computing/Programming
Pilot
+Police
Sorry for beig thick, what are you saying?
Or rather I don't quite get the tone.
The police officer most probably knows more about his job and what he did and why he did it than you do.
It may be a little early to say that nobody could possibly defend his actions, yes?
Maybe he enjoys beating up innocent people. Or maybe his training/experience told him something was dodgy about this guy's behaviour (hands in pockets... hidden weapon? maybe he said something? Who knows...)

mechsympathy

52,758 posts

255 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
mcdjl said:
I know from experience that shoving some one can easily cause them to lose their balance (from both ends of it). As the shove isn't very clear on TV is it possible that the shove was a hurry up and not intended to floor the guy at all...he does certainly appear to be deliberately walking slowly/annoyingly. Hitting him with the batton was certainly a bit extreme.

As for the heart attack that killed him, certainly very unlucky...bought on by the 'attack' or not he doesn't deserve to be dead.Who knows though, had he hurried up he may have had the heart attack in the middle of the crowd and one of the protesters now be getting the blame.
Excess force seems to be a reasonable charge..manslaughter a tad harsh...and no i'm not a cop.
yesWas he drunk? Was he already having the heart attack? Who knows? Certainly no one on this thread does.

Trial by media, isn't it great.

rasputin

1,449 posts

206 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
mechsympathy said:
Was he drunk? Was he already having the heart attack? Who knows? Certainly no one on this thread does.

Trial by media, isn't it great.
Woah there. Don't let common sense get in the way of sophisticated chavdom... "Down with the police! They is on a quota to kill protesters/give us speeding tickets innit!"rolleyes

bigTee

5,546 posts

221 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
The Orphan said:
bigTee said:
The fkwit cop caused that mans death.
You cannot say that.

You don't know all the facts.

A second post mortem is being carried out to investigate further.
Bent copper hits man with nightstick.

Bent copper pushes man to the ground.

Man dies.

Send copper to prison.

Copper gets bummed by inmates he help put away.



Next case.



The Orphan

29,977 posts

251 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
bigTee said:
The Orphan said:
bigTee said:
The fkwit cop caused that mans death.
You cannot say that.

You don't know all the facts.

A second post mortem is being carried out to investigate further.
Bent copper hits man with nightstick.

Bent copper pushes man to the ground.

Man dies.

Send copper to prison.

Copper gets bummed by inmates he help put away.



Next case.
rofl

Too simplistic.

Let's hope nobody you ever push dies, eh?

ewenm

28,506 posts

245 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
bigTee said:
The Orphan said:
bigTee said:
The fkwit cop caused that mans death.
You cannot say that.

You don't know all the facts.

A second post mortem is being carried out to investigate further.
Bent copper hits man with nightstick.

Bent copper pushes man to the ground.

Man dies.

Send copper to prison.

Copper gets bummed by inmates he help put away.



Next case.
Gosh, new theories of causality spring up all the time. rolleyes

911motorsport

7,251 posts

233 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
mechsympathy said:
mcdjl said:
I know from experience that shoving some one can easily cause them to lose their balance (from both ends of it). As the shove isn't very clear on TV is it possible that the shove was a hurry up and not intended to floor the guy at all...he does certainly appear to be deliberately walking slowly/annoyingly. Hitting him with the batton was certainly a bit extreme.

As for the heart attack that killed him, certainly very unlucky...bought on by the 'attack' or not he doesn't deserve to be dead.Who knows though, had he hurried up he may have had the heart attack in the middle of the crowd and one of the protesters now be getting the blame.
Excess force seems to be a reasonable charge..manslaughter a tad harsh...and no i'm not a cop.
yesWas he drunk? Was he already having the heart attack? Who knows? Certainly no one on this thread does.

Trial by media, isn't it great.
Why not? after all, we undergo trial by camera on daily basis in this country.

JRM

2,043 posts

232 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
jesta1865 said:
watch the footage here

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7991206....

then try and justify what the copper did, the man was an animal and i feel strongly that he should be looking for work soon at the very least, if not a conviction to go with it.

the guy was trying to get home and was trying to get round the protest, the copper was way out of order.

is it any wonder we get the attitude off some of the next generation when they see the so called police doing this. i know there will be people telling me what a horrid job the plod do, fine, deal with it you chose to do it, if you can't then leave, don't attack people with their hands in their pockets.

he is no better than some knife wielding chav mugger.
Do people as naive as you REALLY still exist - or are you just 12?

The media must love brainless people like you who open up the Daily Mail and believe every single sensationalist word you read.

ZR1Cliff summed it up perfectly here:
ZR1cliff said:
The fact is we don't know what happened prior to the filming, we also don't know what was being said. We know the police were in a confrontational and aggresive mood because of what was going on around them. We also know the police can't deal with a possible riot situation by asking people to politely move along.

Anyone feel that from the way the deceased was slowly moving he was intentionaly obstructing the police ? Certainly looked to me like he was irritating them by shuffling along. If it was 'kicking off' elsewhere and he was in their way and had been told to move but resisted then I can understand what went on.
When you get a bit more grown up, perhaps you'll understand. What you read in the papers and watch on Sky News is NEVER what actually happened.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not condoning the behaviour of the Police, if what we saw was really as it appears, but it's very easy to draw wrong conclusions when you only have half the evidence.

bigTee

5,546 posts

221 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
ewenm said:
bigTee said:
The Orphan said:
bigTee said:
The fkwit cop caused that mans death.
You cannot say that.

You don't know all the facts.

A second post mortem is being carried out to investigate further.
Bent copper hits man with nightstick.

Bent copper pushes man to the ground.

Man dies.

Send copper to prison.

Copper gets bummed by inmates he help put away.



Next case.
Gosh, new theories of causality spring up all the time. rolleyes
Even if man didn't die - copper should be done for assault........ and go to prison and get bummed.