French passenger jet gone missing from radar screens........

French passenger jet gone missing from radar screens........

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
motco said:
The commentators are studiously avoiding suggesting that the fly-by-wire computer might have dived for cover when the lightning struck. It would potentially ground all modern airliners - worse in a way than a terrorist bomb.


Far from all "modern airliners" are fly by wire.

King Herald

23,501 posts

216 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
CatherineJ said:
I've read that the French are not refusing to rule out a terrorist bomb. I guess they have to say that until they can examine the wreckage.
That sounds contrary to what we heard earlier, that both France and the USA had ruled out terrorist action. Quite how they do that with the minimal information they have is beyond me.
confused


I guess they could pop into PH and ask us, we'd soon put them right. biggrin

Rach*

8,824 posts

216 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
I've been following this thread at work for the last 2 days, not realising one of our nurses has a problem with flying, she's now delaying flying to Canada to see her Grandkids "just in case" rolleyes

CatherineJ

9,586 posts

243 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
King Herald said:
CatherineJ said:
I've read that the French are not refusing to rule out a terrorist bomb. I guess they have to say that until they can examine the wreckage.
That sounds contrary to what we heard earlier, that both France and the USA had ruled out terrorist action. Quite how they do that with the minimal information they have is beyond me.
confused


I guess they could pop into PH and ask us, we'd soon put them right. biggrin
Lol, yes. Apparently the statement came from the French Defence Minister.

grumbledoak

31,534 posts

233 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
Semi hemi said:
Didnt the pilot overide the system to show that they could still have "manual" control...
This explanation is the one I remember from a documentary- pilot error:

http://www.pprune.org/archive/index.php/t-252837.h...

"The investigation clearly states that an error was made by the crew in selecting a vertical speed of 3300 f.p.m. instead of a flight path angle of 3.3 degrees. This, combined with a lack of an installed GPWS, led to the collision with the high terrain on the approach."

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

217 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
CatherineJ said:
I've read that the French are not refusing to rule out a terrorist bomb. I guess they have to say that until they can examine the wreckage.

Edited by CatherineJ on Tuesday 2nd June 20:40
They're probably deciding if they should surrender or not yet.

King Herald

23,501 posts

216 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
I just read on Yahoo that they have made positive ID on seats and wreckage spread over a three mile area, off the coast of Brazil. frown

Cas_P

1,497 posts

183 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
So much speculation....

My thoughts go out to the passengers R.I.P, and their relatives/friends etc frown

Chris_w666

22,655 posts

199 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Semi hemi said:
Eric Mc said:
D B Cooper who hijacked a Northwest Orient Boeing 727 in 1971 and parachuted with the ransome money out the rear airstars. He was never seen again.
It was an odd case, even allowing that it was over 30 odd years ago he only asked for 200,000 dollars and 3 "sport parachute rigs, they never tampered with the parachutes as they thought he was going to take the stewardess with him, Many years later some of the money was found in a river bank in Oregon.
The only hijack that has never been solved and the FBI are still actively looking for him.
I didn't realise the guy in Prison Break was based on a real live criminal.

cottonfoo

6,016 posts

210 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
Cas_P said:
So much speculation....
You should have seen the carnage on pprune.

Those poor souls, families and friends frown

sjn2004

4,051 posts

237 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
King Herald said:
I just read on Yahoo that they have made positive ID on seats and wreckage spread over a three mile area, off the coast of Brazil. frown
740km out into the Atlantic. How deep is it there, will they ever recover the black box etc?

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

231 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Did they charge extra?

Ryanair would.
hehe

thehawk

9,335 posts

207 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
Worth throwing the Qantas A330 into the mix, a sudden dive over Western Australia

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197...

Could be some relation. What's the likelihood of of a similar incident occurring on this Air France plane and putting the aircraft in a situation where it exceeds its structural limits and disintegrates?

julian64

14,317 posts

254 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
I'll guess lightning strike and the new composite nature of the plane.

Give me an old fashioned aluminium aircraft anyday.

Invisible man

39,731 posts

284 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
Semi hemi said:
Invisible man said:
motco said:
The commentators are studiously avoiding suggesting that the fly-by-wire computer might have dived for cover when the lightning struck. It would potentially ground all modern airliners - worse in a way than a terrorist bomb.
Who's doing the investigation? I still have recollections of the A320 Paris Air Show crash in 88
Didnt the pilot overide the system to show that they could still have "manual" control...
Prompting a comment in Flight magazine's "Straight & Level column.
"That the flight crew of the future would consist of One Pilot & One Dog.
The Pilot would be there to feed the dog.
The dog would be there to bite the pilot if he touched anything.
The details are a bit fudged on that one, there were rumours of tampering with evidence, data from the BB didn't corelate with anything etc etc

Eric Mc

122,032 posts

265 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
julian64 said:
I'll guess lightning strike and the new composite nature of the plane.

Give me an old fashioned aluminium aircraft anyday.
The A330 is mostly an "old fashioned aluminium aircraft". It only uses composites in some components such as the tailfin.

Lighning strikes do not tend to bring airliners down.
I think there is now no doubt that the aircraft broke up at altitude and fell in pieces into the ocean. What caused the breakup will be the central part of the investigation.

mattdaniels

7,353 posts

282 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
motco said:
The commentators are studiously avoiding suggesting that the fly-by-wire computer might have dived for cover when the lightning struck
Because they know that if they suggested such complete and utter nonsense, they'd be laughed out of their jobs!

thehawk

9,335 posts

207 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
What is odd is that they are reporting a 4 minute flurry of automated messages being sent from them plane, yet no communication from or to the pilots. Surely the pilots would receive the same messages and contact someone.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
thehawk said:
What is odd is that they are reporting a 4 minute flurry of automated messages being sent from them plane, yet no communication from or to the pilots. Surely the pilots would receive the same messages and contact someone.
If the plane decompressed suddenly they may well have been unconscious or worse!

plg101

4,106 posts

210 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2009
quotequote all
sjn2004 said:
King Herald said:
I just read on Yahoo that they have made positive ID on seats and wreckage spread over a three mile area, off the coast of Brazil. frown
740km out into the Atlantic. How deep is it there, will they ever recover the black box etc?
According to Google Earth, most of that section of the Atlantic is ~3000m deep.