NFL moves to block Rush Limbaugh
Discussion
Apparently Rush thinks he's been "victimized by the media".
Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
unrepentant said:
Apparently Rush thinks he's been "victimized by the media".
Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
It's a shame your hatred of this man stops you appreciating the wider picture of people being denied business opportunities because of their politics.Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
Jimbeaux said:
unrepentant said:
The other people involved in the bid have seen sense and dumped the nut job.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136a530&...
I actually don't listen to his showhttp://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136a530&...
Me thinks he doth protest too much...
OnTheOverrun said:
unrepentant said:
Apparently Rush thinks he's been "victimized by the media".
Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
It's a shame your hatred of this man stops you appreciating the wider picture of people being denied business opportunities because of their politics.Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
I guess you would be quite happy for Nick Griffin to buy your local football club? Or Robert Mugabe maybe?
OnTheOverrun said:
unrepentant said:
Apparently Rush thinks he's been "victimized by the media".
Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
It's a shame your hatred of this man stops you appreciating the wider picture of people being denied business opportunities because of their politics.Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
Edited by Jimbeaux on Friday 16th October 01:21
Disco_Dale said:
Jimbeaux said:
unrepentant said:
The other people involved in the bid have seen sense and dumped the nut job.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136a530&...
I actually don't listen to his showhttp://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136a530&...
Me thinks he doth protest too much...
Edited by Jimbeaux on Friday 16th October 01:19
Jimbeaux said:
OnTheOverrun said:
unrepentant said:
Apparently Rush thinks he's been "victimized by the media".
Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
It's a shame your hatred of this man stops you appreciating the wider picture of people being denied business opportunities because of their politics.Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
Or perhaps more pertinently, lets say you own Subway. You're happy to allow someone with a track record of speaking out against food hygeine to buy one of your franchises?
Edited by unrepentant on Friday 16th October 01:34
unrepentant said:
Jimbeaux said:
OnTheOverrun said:
unrepentant said:
Apparently Rush thinks he's been "victimized by the media".
Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
It's a shame your hatred of this man stops you appreciating the wider picture of people being denied business opportunities because of their politics.Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
Or perhaps more pertinently, lets say you own Subway. You're happy to allow someone with a track record of speaking out against food hygeine to buy one of your franchises?
Edited by unrepentant on Friday 16th October 01:34
Jimbeaux said:
unrepentant said:
Jimbeaux said:
OnTheOverrun said:
unrepentant said:
Apparently Rush thinks he's been "victimized by the media".
Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
It's a shame your hatred of this man stops you appreciating the wider picture of people being denied business opportunities because of their politics.Too funny.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8136deaf&...
Or perhaps more pertinently, lets say you own Subway. You're happy to allow someone with a track record of speaking out against food hygeine to buy one of your franchises?
The NFL are protecting their brand, as Subway would be in the unlikely scenario I outlined above. That's their right, it's their brand and if they don't want a nut job like Limbaugh who has made inflamatory and divisive comments about their business associated with it that's their decision.
unrepentant said:
collateral said:
Unfortunately the soon to be MrsU is a rabid Colts fan and they all have an unhealthy dislike of our guys. We had a party in Indy for the Colts / Pats game last year and I was alone amongst about 40 Hoosiers in cheering for the chosen ones. I did win considerable quantities of alcohol in 2007 from a friend who owns a downtown Indy restaurant when I bet him on week 7 that we would go 16-0 though. Much of the recent Pats Colts beef is down to the media worship of their considerably less successful QB, although I shouldn't run my mouth about that after what happened last Sunday...I never liked the Colts because they pretty much depended entirely on the passing game, but now that's looking like all we have too...Dillon was never properly replaced
I didn't like the move at the time, but letting Seymour go is looking like a worse mistake with every passing week imo.
Then again, it's still early doors - look who nearly won the last 'Bowl
collateral said:
Much of the recent Pats Colts beef is down to the media worship of their considerably less successful QB, although I shouldn't run my mouth about that after what happened last Sunday...I never liked the Colts because they pretty much depended entirely on the passing game, but now that's looking like all we have too...Dillon was never properly replaced
I didn't like the move at the time, but letting Seymour go is looking like a worse mistake with every passing week imo.
Then again, it's still early doors - look who nearly won the last 'Bowl
I couldn't understand the Seymour trade as it came after Vrabel, Bruschi and Harrison had all gone and we were looking thin, a siuation exacerpated when Mayo went down. The fact that Seau has been re signed tells that story.......I didn't like the move at the time, but letting Seymour go is looking like a worse mistake with every passing week imo.
Then again, it's still early doors - look who nearly won the last 'Bowl
unrepentant,
C'mon mate, you can't actually be drawing a morale equivelancy between one of the most heinous, sociapathic people on the planet who is responsible for, literally thousands of people dying and an overweight opinionated talk show host, that for political reasons you don't LIKE?
I hope the hell Jeremy Clarkson doesn't want to buy into a business any time soon. From what I hear, plenty don't like his political attitudes. Personally - I think he's right on target most of the time - even with some of his criticisms of the States
ErnestM
C'mon mate, you can't actually be drawing a morale equivelancy between one of the most heinous, sociapathic people on the planet who is responsible for, literally thousands of people dying and an overweight opinionated talk show host, that for political reasons you don't LIKE?
I hope the hell Jeremy Clarkson doesn't want to buy into a business any time soon. From what I hear, plenty don't like his political attitudes. Personally - I think he's right on target most of the time - even with some of his criticisms of the States
ErnestM
ErnestM said:
unrepentant,
C'mon mate, you can't actually be drawing a morale equivelancy between one of the most heinous, sociapathic people on the planet who is responsible for, literally thousands of people dying and an overweight opinionated talk show host, that for political reasons you don't LIKE?
I hope the hell Jeremy Clarkson doesn't want to buy into a business any time soon. From what I hear, plenty don't like his political attitudes. Personally - I think he's right on target most of the time - even with some of his criticisms of the States
ErnestM
I was responding to the ascertation that anyone should be allowed to do anything commercially, whatever their public views and utterances.C'mon mate, you can't actually be drawing a morale equivelancy between one of the most heinous, sociapathic people on the planet who is responsible for, literally thousands of people dying and an overweight opinionated talk show host, that for political reasons you don't LIKE?
I hope the hell Jeremy Clarkson doesn't want to buy into a business any time soon. From what I hear, plenty don't like his political attitudes. Personally - I think he's right on target most of the time - even with some of his criticisms of the States
ErnestM
Jezza is hugely popular here and even has two columns in the Sunday Times. The only people who don't like him are the tree huggers and the Brownites. However, were he to try and buy into a safety camera partnership (were such things to become commercial) or apply for the post of CEO of BRAKE I am sure that there would be considerable opposition from within. And that is precisely what has happened here. Limbaughs outpourings make him unnaceptable to the people that own the NFL and they have rejected him. As is their absolute right.
unrepentant said:
ErnestM said:
unrepentant,
C'mon mate, you can't actually be drawing a morale equivelancy between one of the most heinous, sociapathic people on the planet who is responsible for, literally thousands of people dying and an overweight opinionated talk show host, that for political reasons you don't LIKE?
I hope the hell Jeremy Clarkson doesn't want to buy into a business any time soon. From what I hear, plenty don't like his political attitudes. Personally - I think he's right on target most of the time - even with some of his criticisms of the States
ErnestM
I was responding to the ascertation that anyone should be allowed to do anything commercially, whatever their public views and utterances.C'mon mate, you can't actually be drawing a morale equivelancy between one of the most heinous, sociapathic people on the planet who is responsible for, literally thousands of people dying and an overweight opinionated talk show host, that for political reasons you don't LIKE?
I hope the hell Jeremy Clarkson doesn't want to buy into a business any time soon. From what I hear, plenty don't like his political attitudes. Personally - I think he's right on target most of the time - even with some of his criticisms of the States
ErnestM
Jezza is hugely popular here and even has two columns in the Sunday Times. The only people who don't like him are the tree huggers and the Brownites. However, were he to try and buy into a safety camera partnership (were such things to become commercial) or apply for the post of CEO of BRAKE I am sure that there would be considerable opposition from within. And that is precisely what has happened here. Limbaughs outpourings make him unnaceptable to the people that own the NFL and they have rejected him. As is their absolute right.
ErnestM
With regard to the Michael Vick thing; rightly or wrongly, expectations of players are different to the expectations of the franchise owners. Frankly, Vick's crime, dispicable though it was, just joins the droves of other players with criminal records as long as pylons.
Oddly, nobody cares that huge amounts of NFL players are or were gun-toting thugs from the hood. They make Premiership players look like librarians. I guess it's "nu-money" taken to an even greater extreme...
Ps, I think the NFL have every right to tell Limbaugh to bugger off. It's a franchise. If I ever franchise a business, I will also be very selective of who I choose to run my franchises. That isn't anti-capitalist.
Oddly, nobody cares that huge amounts of NFL players are or were gun-toting thugs from the hood. They make Premiership players look like librarians. I guess it's "nu-money" taken to an even greater extreme...
Ps, I think the NFL have every right to tell Limbaugh to bugger off. It's a franchise. If I ever franchise a business, I will also be very selective of who I choose to run my franchises. That isn't anti-capitalist.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff