Winky - you have less than 150 days!

Winky - you have less than 150 days!

Author
Discussion

Tangent Police

3,097 posts

177 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
dandarez said:
PLEASE don't think things will be better if the Tories get in. I've lived under all persuasions for nearly 60 years. Usually Joe Public is marginally slightly better off under Labour but don't forget, what you have had since Bliar took office is Noo Labur, NOT Labour! Completely different animal as we have found out to our cost.
Oh, right...

You've forgotten 99% top rate of income tax under Wilson, then, have you?

You've forgotten this Chancer of the Exchequer --->

Bragging that he's going to tax you until the pips squeak, then, have you?

Labour or New Labour...they're both fundamentally control freaks. All socialists are.
As I've said lots of times, all the main parties are social democrats in principle (ignore the word democrat-they do).

They all know best how to manage you, as you are greedy, selfish and irresponsible. You can't be trusted to form and look after your own communities, so they have to intervene, disrupt traditional organisations and supplement their own versions.

Interference in the name of a very very twisted concept of liberalism.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
Tangent Police said:
mybrainhurts said:
dandarez said:
PLEASE don't think things will be better if the Tories get in. I've lived under all persuasions for nearly 60 years. Usually Joe Public is marginally slightly better off under Labour but don't forget, what you have had since Bliar took office is Noo Labur, NOT Labour! Completely different animal as we have found out to our cost.
Oh, right...

You've forgotten 99% top rate of income tax under Wilson, then, have you?

You've forgotten this Chancer of the Exchequer --->

Bragging that he's going to tax you until the pips squeak, then, have you?

Labour or New Labour...they're both fundamentally control freaks. All socialists are.
As I've said lots of times, all the main parties are social democrats in principle (ignore the word democrat-they do).

They all know best how to manage you, as you are greedy, selfish and irresponsible. You can't be trusted to form and look after your own communities, so they have to intervene, disrupt traditional organisations and supplement their own versions.

Interference in the name of a very very twisted concept of liberalism.
You might be right, but Labour, new or old, are still more socialist and controlling than the others, so must be avoided at all costs...

Tangent Police

3,097 posts

177 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Tangent Police said:
mybrainhurts said:
dandarez said:
PLEASE don't think things will be better if the Tories get in. I've lived under all persuasions for nearly 60 years. Usually Joe Public is marginally slightly better off under Labour but don't forget, what you have had since Bliar took office is Noo Labur, NOT Labour! Completely different animal as we have found out to our cost.
Oh, right...

You've forgotten 99% top rate of income tax under Wilson, then, have you?

You've forgotten this Chancer of the Exchequer --->

Bragging that he's going to tax you until the pips squeak, then, have you?

Labour or New Labour...they're both fundamentally control freaks. All socialists are.
As I've said lots of times, all the main parties are social democrats in principle (ignore the word democrat-they do).

They all know best how to manage you, as you are greedy, selfish and irresponsible. You can't be trusted to form and look after your own communities, so they have to intervene, disrupt traditional organisations and supplement their own versions.

Interference in the name of a very very twisted concept of liberalism.
You might be right, but Labour, new or old, are still more socialist and controlling than the others, so must be avoided at all costs...
I think the illiberal dumbocrats take the biscuit in this case.

It's like breaking a bone, or getting a tooth knocked out or having a massive deep cut.

No wonder people don't want to vote!

SeeFive

8,280 posts

234 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
Tangent Police said:
I think the illiberal dumbocrats take the biscuit in this case.

It's like breaking a bone, or getting a tooth knocked out or having a massive deep cut.

No wonder people don't want to vote!
It's not so much that people do not want to vote. It is that there is no real differentiation between the major parties today, and no real qualities of leadership on display, and no visible plan to succeed going forward.

It's all bandwagon, spin and PR soundbites, and of course the ability to completely ignore millions of people that petition parliament every year against unfair legislation.

The day when someone steps up and says something with a potential to change the situation in the UK, irrespective of the popularity hit that person may suffer, but with a level of honesty as to how that change will be felt by the populous (honest expectation setting) to achieve the benefit is gone.

Years ago, they kissed babies. Now they kiss spin doctors arses.

If someone can show me a different but sensible approach, complete with cost and impact on my taxes, and the likely short and longer term outcome (with milestones) to:

Law and order
Climate science bks transparency
Stealth / hidden tax transparency
UK Competitiveness in the world economy
A fair UK immigration policy
Our involvement in conflict outside these shores
The benefit system and associated reliance of the great unwashed on the system
Road Safety Policy - even to the detail of cameras versus proper policing and driving standard uplift
UK / Euro government and law making blurs
bks legislation for the sake of legislation and keeping PS empires growing (within H&S, Diversity etc)
While we are there, streamlining of Public Sector Administration
Foreign aid
... and so on, they just might get my vote over my established voting pattern since 1978. At the moment, I see no clear plans from any of the parties on any of the important issues.

It's a bit like running all the projects in a company, in this case, UK PLC. Work out what is needed, cost it, prioritise, establish plans, allocate funds, execute and measure them on an ongoing basis and have a change control method for the longer term stuff to include developing issues. If it ain't working, no company will wait 4-5 years to fire the exec responsible. So, if the govt miss the milestones, those responsible are out instantly - just like in the private sector.

Sadly, our parties paint the blue sky, never tell us their plan, execute poorly without leadership / urgency / accountability and then just do whatever they want as new challenges arise that will keep them in power, and seem to have no change management.

The current lot are always happy to throw money at world events that really have little to do with us whilst taxing us more to make it possible. In the situation we are in right now, we should be focusing on what is necessary here, rather than throwing, for example 120 million at an airport scanner somewhere else as a result of extremist action against years worth of poor international policy deployed by our government, making us the biggest laughing stocks and one of the least popular nations on this planet with many other nations (except when we are doling out the cash to them of course).

So, with no clear position from any party on what I can think to write in just a few minutes, how can people like me know how to vote? We actually want to, we are just not given the decision making materials.

M3333

2,261 posts

215 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
An interesting aside I came across when discussing UKIP with others is what one supporter of them said. That they should start referring to themselves in 'full', ie: they are the 'UNITED KINGDOM INDEPENDENCE PARTY'.

Then more of joe public will understand. The abbreviated 'UKIP' to a good section of joe public, I can see, is catchy but means little.
They are the singles issue - don't like Europe - party. (They're not that keen on immigrants either, but daren't say too much about it for fear of being exposed for being a BNP clone)

If you vote UKIP you waste your vote and help Winky towards a fourth term for Labour. Don't be stupid. UKIP are a bunch of inadequate misfits.

YAD061

39,731 posts

285 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
Zod said:
dandarez said:
An interesting aside I came across when discussing UKIP with others is what one supporter of them said. That they should start referring to themselves in 'full', ie: they are the 'UNITED KINGDOM INDEPENDENCE PARTY'.

Then more of joe public will understand. The abbreviated 'UKIP' to a good section of joe public, I can see, is catchy but means little.
They are the singles issue - don't like Europe - party. (They're not that keen on immigrants either, but daren't say too much about it for fear of being exposed for being a BNP clone)

If you vote UKIP you waste your vote and help Winky towards a fourth term for Labour. Don't be stupid. UKIP are a bunch of inadequate misfits.
Vote for whoever the fk you want to. If anyone is falling for this tactical voting bull then wake up, it's what they want, a 2 horse race between 2 very similar parties with fingers in very similar pies

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
Zod said:
If you vote UKIP you waste your vote and help Winky towards a fourth term for Labour. Don't be stupid. UKIP are a bunch of inadequate misfits.
Basically the kick in the bks party is currently in power and everyone says i should vote for the punch in the face party

I think i shall not bother thank you very much

Tangent Police

3,097 posts

177 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
Zod said:
dandarez said:
An interesting aside I came across when discussing UKIP with others is what one supporter of them said. That they should start referring to themselves in 'full', ie: they are the 'UNITED KINGDOM INDEPENDENCE PARTY'.

Then more of joe public will understand. The abbreviated 'UKIP' to a good section of joe public, I can see, is catchy but means little.
They are the singles issue - don't like Europe - party. (They're not that keen on immigrants either, but daren't say too much about it for fear of being exposed for being a BNP clone)

If you vote UKIP you waste your vote and help Winky towards a fourth term for Labour. Don't be stupid. UKIP are a bunch of inadequate misfits.
I DON'T WANT A SOCIAL DEMOCRAT PARTY, PERIOD.


Which part of THEY ARE ALL THE SAME has escaped your tiny mind?

They are not a single issue party DO YOUR fkING READING curse

Edited by Tangent Police on Monday 4th January 17:31

clarkey318is

2,220 posts

175 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
Yup, if UKIP don't get in I couldn't give a fk who wins because then we are fked for the rest of ever. If we do not reduce our dependency on other countries then we will become a third world one ourselves.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
Tangent Police said:
Which part of THEY ARE ALL THE SAME has escaped your tiny mind?
They're not, as I pointed out earlier...

The Hypno-Toad

12,284 posts

206 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
www.order-order.com (Guido Fawkes) is reporting today that a plot is under way from within the Liarbour party (again) to dispose of Winky before the election.....


elster

17,517 posts

211 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
musclecarmad said:
Oilchange said:
Perhaps they should raise income tax in Yorkshire to 95% ...
no one pays tax in Yorkshire as there are very few professional PAYE jobs.

the wealthy people are car dealers, builders, taxi company owners, shop owners etc etc etc. They pay no tax anyway!

you'd be surprised at how few employed people in Yorkshire as a whole earn over £25,000.
I guess you mean South Yorkshire, as that isn't the case for the rest of the regions.

Unless you are going to show me some figures I would probably say this is cr@p anyway.

Tangent Police

3,097 posts

177 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Tangent Police said:
Which part of THEY ARE ALL THE SAME has escaped your tiny mind?
They're not, as I pointed out earlier...
From a ideological and action point of view, I'd say their distinction is less than their tie colours.

The ste we hear on the rotbox is just poor rhetoric. If CMD has the bks to even be a mild classical liberal, rather than the social democrat he is, I will be most surprised.


tinman0

18,231 posts

241 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
PLEASE don't think things will be better if the Tories get in. I've lived under all persuasions for nearly 60 years. Usually Joe Public is marginally slightly better off under Labour but don't forget, what you have had since Bliar took office is Noo Labur, NOT Labour! Completely different animal as we have found out to our cost.
Different animal? Same results.

Labour got kicked out of power in 79 for near bankrupting the country, and we are in a strangely similar position today.

Bing o

15,184 posts

220 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Too late in my opinion, the UK is about to become an insignificant spec on the edge of the peoples republic of europe for the next few generations, a bankrupt failed country.

The irreperable damage has been done ever since WWII.

smartie

2,604 posts

274 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all

Morningside

24,110 posts

230 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
smartie said:
Eh? confused

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

245 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Morningside said:
smartie said:
Eh? confused
It's an Alfa 147.

147 (days) geddit?

dandarez

13,289 posts

284 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
dandarez said:
PLEASE don't think things will be better if the Tories get in. I've lived under all persuasions for nearly 60 years. Usually Joe Public is marginally slightly better off under Labour but don't forget, what you have had since Bliar took office is Noo Labur, NOT Labour! Completely different animal as we have found out to our cost.
Different animal? Same results.

Labour got kicked out of power in 79 for near bankrupting the country, and we are in a strangely similar position today.
I'm not standing up for past Labour nor Tories but the position today under Noo Labur is not even remotely comparable to 79.
Anyway, you never heard of Norman Lamont and Black Wednesday under the Tories?

Look around you in the 79 crisis, rubbish piling up on street corners and not burying the dead ... Look around you in 92 under the Tories, wasn't nice but eventually we carried on.

Here's the rub. Look around you today and 79 and 92 pale into absolute insignificance to what has happened under this shower.

This country is now almost unrecognisable from it's past. We are now lackies to others, in how we are ruled right through to contols of our business and welfare by others outside. Noo Labur has sold us down the river to Europe and everyone else who wanted a piece. Political correctness affects every day of our lives. All utter madness. Surveillance on a scale not seen in any other western democracy.

The only answer is a sea change.
And we wont get it with the Tories.
As I said, if I have to, I will vote Tory for one reason, just to get rid of Noo Lab. But if a momentum does begin to ride with UKIP (there is no reason why if voters have conviction and are not brainwashed by the 'it'll let Noo Lab back in' that UKIP cannot win a large number of seats). I see it, like many, as a final chance to regain our total independence, the only thing upon which this country has thrived.