Herman van Rompuy - Who are you?

Herman van Rompuy - Who are you?

Author
Discussion

loafer123

15,451 posts

216 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
AJLintern said:
There are ways of conducting yourself to achieve such things though - what he said may be true enough, but if you want to remain credible you've got to be a bit more subtle than that.
If he had, would we ever have heard about it?

When was the last time you saw a speech from that chamber on the news?

Oh, yes, that's right - the last time he put the cat amongst the pigeons.


YAD061

39,731 posts

285 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
Strange how it made a hero out of Daniel Hannan then.....


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politic...

Alex

9,975 posts

285 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
I believe Farage is insulting what Van Rumpuy represents, rather than the man himself. In this respect, I think it was justified.


YAD061

39,731 posts

285 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
Trommel said:
Farage is an idiot.

I imagine he is trying to get himself ejected for more publicity.
He's a better idiot than Brown or Cameron IMO

Balmoral Green

40,943 posts

249 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
YAD061 said:
Strange how it made a hero out of Daniel Hannan then.....


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politic...
Completely different IMO, no personal insults.

FourWheelDrift

88,557 posts

285 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
YAD061 said:
Strange how it made a hero out of Daniel Hannan then.....


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politic...
Hannan attacked Brown's governing of the country, Farage's was just a personal insult.

AJLintern

4,202 posts

264 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
YAD061 said:
Strange how it made a hero out of Daniel Hannan then.....


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politic...
That was an eloquent piece without becoming personal - good on him smile

Bonefish Blues

26,831 posts

224 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
Alex said:
I believe Farage is insulting what Van Rumpuy represents, rather than the man himself. In this respect, I think it was justified.
Nope, don't see that - you'd be rightly offended if I had addressed our difference of opinion by calling you a snivelling tw*t or similar, simply because I disagreed with you.

Not relevant, not germane, not big, not clever - but fantastic publicity one might suppose for an individual pandering to certain views.

Go Nige, you tell 'im mate! F*cking Europeans.

Jasandjules

69,939 posts

230 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
AJLintern said:
So you're saying as they have no credibility within the EU anyway, they have nothing to lose by behaving this way? I guess it's one way of stimulating some publicity for their views! smile
The Question you have to ask however is what Credibility the EU has (I take it from your comments to mean the EU Commission and Parliament i.e. the legislative powers) in the eyes of the populations which it purports to represent.


YAD061

39,731 posts

285 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
AJLintern said:
YAD061 said:
Strange how it made a hero out of Daniel Hannan then.....


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politic...
That was an eloquent piece without becoming personal - good on him smile
laugh

Bein likened to a "Brezhnev era apparatchik" certainly is more eloquent than having "all the charisma of a damp rag and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk" but both are damn good IMO.

tangent police

3,097 posts

177 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
I wonder if the EU have one of these:-


AJLintern

4,202 posts

264 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
AJLintern said:
So you're saying as they have no credibility within the EU anyway, they have nothing to lose by behaving this way? I guess it's one way of stimulating some publicity for their views! smile
The Question you have to ask however is what Credibility the EU has (I take it from your comments to mean the EU Commission and Parliament i.e. the legislative powers) in the eyes of the populations which it purports to represent.
Not a lot of credibility true, but having someone on the inside to represent people who aren't sold on the idea of the EU is valuable and shouldn't wasted. Ok so it's all publicity, but care should be taken not to alienate themselves too much and become completely sidelined or they may as well not be part of it at all.

Police State

Original Poster:

4,068 posts

221 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
AJLintern said:
Jasandjules said:
AJLintern said:
So you're saying as they have no credibility within the EU anyway, they have nothing to lose by behaving this way? I guess it's one way of stimulating some publicity for their views! smile
The Question you have to ask however is what Credibility the EU has (I take it from your comments to mean the EU Commission and Parliament i.e. the legislative powers) in the eyes of the populations which it purports to represent.
Not a lot of credibility true, but having someone on the inside to represent people who aren't sold on the idea of the EU is valuable and shouldn't wasted. Ok so it's all publicity, but care should be taken not to alienate themselves too much and become completely sidelined or they may as well not be part of it at all.
Credibility?, with who? and to what end? Far too idealistic, and conformist. UKIP et al are the dog in the manger; the EU establishment will never treat them as anything else but that. UKIP's stance is crystal clear; they want out of the EU superstate, you know, the one that the various polite, smiling-while-lying, upright leaders of the constituent countries promised their people would never happen... against the backdrop of what van Rompuy and his cronies represent, Farage's insults were understated. He should have, but couldn't have called them what they really are. Trecherous, devious slugs without a mandate and fit for nothing else but dictating peoples lives to them.


odyssey2200

18,650 posts

210 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
Police State said:
AJLintern said:
Jasandjules said:
AJLintern said:
So you're saying as they have no credibility within the EU anyway, they have nothing to lose by behaving this way? I guess it's one way of stimulating some publicity for their views! smile
The Question you have to ask however is what Credibility the EU has (I take it from your comments to mean the EU Commission and Parliament i.e. the legislative powers) in the eyes of the populations which it purports to represent.
Not a lot of credibility true, but having someone on the inside to represent people who aren't sold on the idea of the EU is valuable and shouldn't wasted. Ok so it's all publicity, but care should be taken not to alienate themselves too much and become completely sidelined or they may as well not be part of it at all.
Credibility?, with who? and to what end? Far too idealistic, and conformist. UKIP et al are the dog in the manger; the EU establishment will never treat them as anything else but that. UKIP's stance is crystal clear; they want out of the EU superstate, you know, the one that the various polite, smiling-while-lying, upright leaders of the constituent countries promised their people would never happen... against the backdrop of what van Rompuy and his cronies represent, Farage's insults were understated. He should have, but couldn't have called them what they really are. Trecherous, devious slugs without a mandate and fit for nothing else but dictating peoples lives to them.
clap

Jasandjules

69,939 posts

230 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
AJLintern said:
Not a lot of credibility true, but having someone on the inside to represent people who aren't sold on the idea of the EU is valuable and shouldn't wasted. Ok so it's all publicity, but care should be taken not to alienate themselves too much and become completely sidelined or they may as well not be part of it at all.
They are there not to represent people but to destroy the EU from within and to continue to highlight the gravy train approach so that more and more people refuse to accept being a member of the EU, thereby electing UKIP members (and their equivalents in other countries) and leading to each country withdrawing from the EU. Consider it as "the enemy within". That is their reason for being MEPs.

AJLintern

4,202 posts

264 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
Ok fair enough - if that's how they intend to achieve their goal, then good luck to them. I'm not that familiar with the UKIP apart from their obvious anti-EU stance.

YAD061

39,731 posts

285 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
odyssey2200 said:
Police State said:
AJLintern said:
Jasandjules said:
AJLintern said:
So you're saying as they have no credibility within the EU anyway, they have nothing to lose by behaving this way? I guess it's one way of stimulating some publicity for their views! smile
The Question you have to ask however is what Credibility the EU has (I take it from your comments to mean the EU Commission and Parliament i.e. the legislative powers) in the eyes of the populations which it purports to represent.
Not a lot of credibility true, but having someone on the inside to represent people who aren't sold on the idea of the EU is valuable and shouldn't wasted. Ok so it's all publicity, but care should be taken not to alienate themselves too much and become completely sidelined or they may as well not be part of it at all.
Credibility?, with who? and to what end? Far too idealistic, and conformist. UKIP et al are the dog in the manger; the EU establishment will never treat them as anything else but that. UKIP's stance is crystal clear; they want out of the EU superstate, you know, the one that the various polite, smiling-while-lying, upright leaders of the constituent countries promised their people would never happen... against the backdrop of what van Rompuy and his cronies represent, Farage's insults were understated. He should have, but couldn't have called them what they really are. Trecherous, devious slugs without a mandate and fit for nothing else but dictating peoples lives to them.
clap
seconded

dandarez

13,293 posts

284 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
YAD061 said:
odyssey2200 said:
Police State said:
AJLintern said:
Jasandjules said:
AJLintern said:
So you're saying as they have no credibility within the EU anyway, they have nothing to lose by behaving this way? I guess it's one way of stimulating some publicity for their views! smile
The Question you have to ask however is what Credibility the EU has (I take it from your comments to mean the EU Commission and Parliament i.e. the legislative powers) in the eyes of the populations which it purports to represent.
Not a lot of credibility true, but having someone on the inside to represent people who aren't sold on the idea of the EU is valuable and shouldn't wasted. Ok so it's all publicity, but care should be taken not to alienate themselves too much and become completely sidelined or they may as well not be part of it at all.
Credibility?, with who? and to what end? Far too idealistic, and conformist. UKIP et al are the dog in the manger; the EU establishment will never treat them as anything else but that. UKIP's stance is crystal clear; they want out of the EU superstate, you know, the one that the various polite, smiling-while-lying, upright leaders of the constituent countries promised their people would never happen... against the backdrop of what van Rompuy and his cronies represent, Farage's insults were understated. He should have, but couldn't have called them what they really are. Trecherous, devious slugs without a mandate and fit for nothing else but dictating peoples lives to them.
clap
seconded
clap

seconded

AJLintern

4,202 posts

264 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
Shouldn't that be thirded? wink

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

210 months

Thursday 25th February 2010
quotequote all
AJLintern said:
Shouldn't that be thirded? wink
wouldn't a second second be a fourth?