Venables allegedly possessed child porn

[yazza54]

That should be culled and fed to pigs. Instead he costing us a fortune to keep alive. WHY?

[Ozzie Osmond]

Gentlemen - please think before you rant. Two wrongs don't make a right and winding up the cycle of violence achieves nothing.

He was looking at, downloading and sharing pictures. Deeply unattractive but not directly doing harm to another person despite the obvious connection.

Now ponder this. What of the actual offenders who were doing the acts pictured? How and when are they going to be brought to justice? Our security services are apparently able to monitor email and phone/mobile communications to spot a terrorist plot in a house in Bradford from 250 miles away. They must be able to monitor the purveyors of extreme porn in exactly the same way. Yet it's not done. I'm willing to bet extreme porn causes the greater suffering on a day-to-day basis and strongly believe they should get to the root of it. Same with drug trafficking.

But then the Scots released al-Megrahi for "compassionate" reasons. Go figure!

[Google [bot]]

^^^exactly right. No bigger picture; tabloid style witch-hunt comments most of these. Of course the bloke is a . Consider the wider implications of invoking legislation that allows this kind of emotional reactionary response.

[Asterix]

Google [bot] said:

^^^exactly right. No bigger picture; tabloid style witch-hunt comments most of these. Of course the bloke is a . Consider the wider implications of invoking legislation that allows this kind of emotional reactionary response.

Bot & Ozzie - very good points.

However, this chap has had his chance after one of the most heinous crime committed in my lifetime that I can remember - I'm 41.

Remember that he was trying to bin his hard drive when his supervisory bod came round. He knows exactly what he was doing - he is making a lucid decision to propagate child pornography and while I can't prove that he will take the next step and go into 'production', I'm betting that if he thought he wouldn't get caught, he would.

I'm not a reactionist to the tabloids - I’m using my sense of right, my feeling to protect those that can't protect themselves. He's lost his 'right' to be treated as a human being. This animal should hang, in public.

[ExChrispy Porker]

If you are going to start hanging people who enjoy kiddy porn, you will need a lot of hangmen, and be prepared for some VERY high profile offenders.

[10 Pence Short]

You do have to ask what effect treating a 10 year old boy as an adult and removing his opportunity to develop normal relationships has had, too.

Most men would be pretty fked up from a relationship point of view if they been prevented from having one between the age of 10 and 18.

[Asterix]

ExChrispy Porker said:

If you are going to start hanging people who enjoy kiddy porn, you will need a lot of hangmen, and be prepared for some VERY high profile offenders.

Those that are caught, 'fess up, go into rehabilitation and sort themselves out have nothing to fear.

Those that kill 4 year olds on train tracks having tortured them first, get all the help possible and then revert to form do have something to fear.

[Jasandjules]

ExChrispy Porker said:

If you are going to start hanging people who enjoy kiddy porn, you will need a lot of hangmen, and be prepared for some VERY high profile offenders.

So? I have no problem with paying a few extra hangmen, nor do I care what level of individual commits the offence, they are all scum who deserve to be punished.

[dandarez]

Ozzie Osmond said:

Gentlemen - please think before you rant. Two wrongs don't make a right and winding up the cycle of violence achieves nothing.

He was looking at, downloading and sharing pictures. Deeply unattractive but not directly doing harm to another person despite the obvious connection.

Now ponder this. What of the actual offenders who were doing the acts pictured? How and when are they going to be brought to justice? Our security services are apparently able to monitor email and phone/mobile communications to spot a terrorist plot in a house in Bradford from 250 miles away. They must be able to monitor the purveyors of extreme porn in exactly the same way. Yet it's not done. I'm willing to bet extreme porn causes the greater suffering on a day-to-day basis and strongly believe they should get to the root of it. Same with drug trafficking.

But then the Scots released al-Megrahi for "compassionate" reasons. Go figure!

How do you know the process is not in place to search out the offenders in the stuff viewed? You don't.
Venables was also caught in possession of cocaine, mentioned on the news as a 'minor' offence. He wouldn't be a problem if we adhered to real justice.

Re last sentence. Forgetting what he had done or not done, Megrahi 'was' actually released on compassionate grounds!

The report on him said if he was (please note as this point is continually ignored in the press) 'left in prison' he would probably die within 3 months.

The fact that he is still alive (but still terminally ill, so he 'will' die probably sooner than later) has more to do with the fact that the Libyans are now giving him the best treatment at no expense AND that he is now back close to his family and their support.

Support, family and surroundings can and does very often extend life expectancy.

[Dick_Phallus]

Why, when hearing about the charges against him, could I only think '4Chan' ?

[EDLT]

Dick_Phallus said:

Why, when hearing about the charges against him, could I only think '4Chan' ?

No idea, he was probably on AnonTalk.

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Anontalk

[tybo]

ExChrispy Porker said:

If you are going to start hanging people who enjoy kiddy porn, you will need a lot of hangmen, and be prepared for some VERY high profile offenders.

Sounds like you're referring to the Hollie Greig case, is that right?

[Dick_Phallus]

tybo said:

ExChrispy Porker said:

If you are going to start hanging people who enjoy kiddy porn, you will need a lot of hangmen, and be prepared for some VERY high profile offenders.

Sounds like you're referring to the Hollie Greig case, is that right?

Is that actually as genuine as it sounds? Only I haven't seen much reported in the mainstream media, just a load of David Icke sites.

[grumbledoak]

I suspect every serving or ex- BiB on this thread have just found something far more interesting to be getting on with...

[tybo]

Dick_Phallus said:

tybo said:

ExChrispy Porker said:

If you are going to start hanging people who enjoy kiddy porn, you will need a lot of hangmen, and be prepared for some VERY high profile offenders.

Sounds like you're referring to the Hollie Greig case, is that right?

Is that actually as genuine as it sounds? Only I haven't seen much reported in the mainstream media, just a load of David Icke sites.

Don't dismiss David icke, he's only reporting on what he, and many others have uncovered.

Have a good look into the whole story and you'll see why you haven't seen much reporting from the mainstream media.

Having read what i've read, it seems the "VERY" high profile offenders in this case, are merely the tip of the iceberg....

http://thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=12246

[ExChrispy Porker]

Jasandjules said:

ExChrispy Porker said:

If you are going to start hanging people who enjoy kiddy porn, you will need a lot of hangmen, and be prepared for some VERY high profile offenders.

So? I have no problem with paying a few extra hangmen, nor do I care what level of individual commits the offence, they are all scum who deserve to be punished.

I merely make the point that such a law would never get through the Commons, let alone the Lords. Bit too close to home for a lot of them.

[ExChrispy Porker]

tybo said:

Dick_Phallus said:

tybo said:

ExChrispy Porker said:

If you are going to start hanging people who enjoy kiddy porn, you will need a lot of hangmen, and be prepared for some VERY high profile offenders.

Sounds like you're referring to the Hollie Greig case, is that right?

Is that actually as genuine as it sounds? Only I haven't seen much reported in the mainstream media, just a load of David Icke sites.

Don't dismiss David icke, he's only reporting on what he, and many others have uncovered.

Have a good look into the whole story and you'll see why you haven't seen much reporting from the mainstream media.

Having read what i've read, it seems the "VERY" high profile offenders in this case, are merely the tip of the iceberg....

http://thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=12246

I knew nothing about this. the people I were referring to were definitely not in the Labour Party.

[tybo]

ExChrispy Porker said:

tybo said:

Dick_Phallus said:

tybo said:

ExChrispy Porker said:

If you are going to start hanging people who enjoy kiddy porn, you will need a lot of hangmen, and be prepared for some VERY high profile offenders.

Sounds like you're referring to the Hollie Greig case, is that right?

Is that actually as genuine as it sounds? Only I haven't seen much reported in the mainstream media, just a load of David Icke sites.

Don't dismiss David icke, he's only reporting on what he, and many others have uncovered.

Have a good look into the whole story and you'll see why you haven't seen much reporting from the mainstream media.

Having read what i've read, it seems the "VERY" high profile offenders in this case, are merely the tip of the iceberg....

http://thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=12246

I knew nothing about this. the people I were referring to were definitely not in the Labour Party.

But they are/were members of a political party?

[rudecherub]

10 Pence Short said:

You do have to ask what effect treating a 10 year old boy as an adult and removing his opportunity to develop normal relationships has had, too.

Most men would be pretty fked up from a relationship point of view if they been prevented from having one between the age of 10 and 18.

That would be most of the ruling class for the last few hundred years given the tradition of all boy boarding schools.

But then again keeping a kid like this in care costs around 3 times as much per year as Eton.

[ExChrispy Porker]

Indeed.