Could a Lib Dem Govt. be good for the country?

Could a Lib Dem Govt. be good for the country?

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
MX7 said:
excel789 said:
Vote for this lot then..http://lpuk.org/pages/about-us.php
What happens if you don't live on Devizes or Sutton and Cheam?
Nothing stopping you running for Parliament is there?

davido140

9,614 posts

226 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
Engineer1 said:
Last I remember the Libs where going to reduce council tax to zero, but replace it with local income tax, which could depending on how it is implemented be a better method.
Sounds st to me, you live alone, in a one bed or studio flat, couldnt fill a bin in a week if you tried, no kids, use little or no public services, but happen to earn good money.

you'd get fked in the ass for the local income tax to pay for all the stuff you never bloody use.

a "fair" system would be paying for the services you use, and not paying for those you dont.

Of course, the councils would soon find themselves in the hole for millions as they continue to spunk money up the wall and waste it on expensive showpieces that nobody ever uses.



Diderot

7,320 posts

192 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
davido140 said:
Engineer1 said:
Last I remember the Libs where going to reduce council tax to zero, but replace it with local income tax, which could depending on how it is implemented be a better method.
Sounds st to me, you live alone, in a one bed or studio flat, couldnt fill a bin in a week if you tried, no kids, use little or no public services, but happen to earn good money.

you'd get fked in the ass for the local income tax to pay for all the stuff you never bloody use.

a "fair" system would be paying for the services you use, and not paying for those you dont.

Of course, the councils would soon find themselves in the hole for millions as they continue to spunk money up the wall and waste it on expensive showpieces that nobody ever uses.
yes

pilchardthecat

7,483 posts

179 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
davido140 said:
Engineer1 said:
Last I remember the Libs where going to reduce council tax to zero, but replace it with local income tax, which could depending on how it is implemented be a better method.
Sounds st to me, you live alone, in a one bed or studio flat, couldnt fill a bin in a week if you tried, no kids, use little or no public services, but happen to earn good money.

you'd get fked in the ass for the local income tax to pay for all the stuff you never bloody use.

a "fair" system would be paying for the services you use, and not paying for those you dont.

Of course, the councils would soon find themselves in the hole for millions as they continue to spunk money up the wall and waste it on expensive showpieces that nobody ever uses.
This is typical of modern socialists - unlike the socialists of old, who were proletariat and wanted to reclaim the accumulated wealth of the upper classes, the modern lot just want to penalise those who are wealthy by income (ie the productive) regardless of whether they have any accumulated wealth.

Those with vast accumulations and little income get to feed of those with no accumulated wealth. In days of old (that is prior to the free market thinking entering the conservative ideology) this support for the status quo was called conservatism, because it is designed to prevent the movement of wealth. It now belongs to the left.

MX7

7,902 posts

174 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
excel789 said:
MX7 said:
excel789 said:
Vote for this lot then..http://lpuk.org/pages/about-us.php
What happens if you don't live on Devizes or Sutton and Cheam?
Nothing stopping you running for Parliament is there?
But I'm a Libertarian. We shouldn't have any MP's!

davido140 said:
Sounds st to me, you live alone, in a one bed or studio flat, couldnt fill a bin in a week if you tried, no kids, use little or no public services, but happen to earn good money.
So, a bit like Poll Tax then.

davido140 said:
a "fair" system would be paying for the services you use, and not paying for those you dont.
If people could pay for what they use, we wouldn't have any public services. We're never going to reach a situation where opting out is viable, and nor should we. There are plenty of people who need genuine assistance.


sjn2004

4,051 posts

237 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
It would be a complete disaster. Seems they tell completely different things to different constituencies depending whether they are fighting Labour or the Conservatives. They'll sing any song as long as you vote for them.

http://blogs.notw.co.uk/politics/2010/04/nick-cleg...

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
excel789 said:
AJS- said:
ZeeTacoe said:
AJS- said:
Yes, in the sense that it would show the lefties that their ideas don't work in any colour.
as nice as proving them wrong I personally couldn't take 5 years of libdem hell.
Much quicker and less damaging than 5 years of Cameron hades, followed by anohter 5 years of Labour hell, and so on and so on, until we're properly fked.
Vote for this lot then..http://lpuk.org/pages/about-us.php ..the least worst imho. In fact, their manifesto is what I'd expect from a proper Tory party.

Edited by excel789 on Saturday 17th April 14:31
It all makes some sense but they stand no chance of winning anything, because really the vast majority of British people don't want anything like that. They still believe their stupid socialism can work.

As for what's stopping me from running for parliament. I live in Thailand and have no desire to go back to the UK in the near future, even if I could go back and save the world tomorrow. To paraphrase Homer Simpson, it's easy to sit on the sidelines sniping and saying I told you so... and fun too!

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
MX7 said:
We shouldn't have any MP's!
Good point.

Mr E Driver

8,542 posts

184 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
I cannot see things being any worse if they are elected as there are civil servants that will be telling them what they can and cannot do and the consequences of any course of action.
When Labour came to power none of them had any experience as they had been out of it for what was it, 18 years?
Considering what the Tories did in the 80's and now Winkys cronies have fked up good and proper (and are trying to tell us they know how to fix it) the LibDems can't make things worse, can they?

Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
Clegg probably WOULD be the Tory party leader if the Tories weren't so bonkers Eurosceptic.
Yes, because Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy have done so well from the European project.

Stevenj214

4,941 posts

228 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
sjn2004 said:
It would be a complete disaster. Seems they tell completely different things to different constituencies depending whether they are fighting Labour or the Conservatives. They'll sing any song as long as you vote for them.

http://blogs.notw.co.uk/politics/2010/04/nick-cleg...
Article said:
On immigration, the Lib Dems have promised a “sensitive” approach that allows the right number of foreign workers into Britain and then gives them the resources they need to look after their families and language problems.

In Hove, on the South coast, Nick Clegg told his party’s local newsletter: “Nasty right wing politicians and even Labour politicians try to blame the immigrants for the problems.

“It’s time areas with higher levels received the resources they were promised.”

And in West Worcestershire, candidate Richard Burt said “The Liberal Democrats are the only party willing to offer a green card immigration system like Australia.”

But in areas where local voters have been warnng they are fed up with large numbers of immigrants the Lib Dems miraculously change their tune.

In Caerphilly, a crucial Welsh marginal seat, local candidate Kay David promises: “Immigration will be fixed with stringent border checks and newcomers should learn English.

And in the London seat of Kenilworth and Southam, Lib Dem leaflets say: “Immigration, especially illegal immigration, is rightly of concern to many people and lack of proper controls is just not good enough.”
I don't see mixed messages here?

Article said:
In some parts of the country, Lib Dems talk tough on crime - saying ‘life should mean life’.

On Merseyside, where they are contesting Sefton Central, Nick Clegg said: ‘A “life sentence” usually means just over ten years in prison. It’s got to change.’

But back in London, Clegg’s own policy guide says “Labour and the Tories have become embroiled in a sentencing arms race in a bid to pander to tabloid newspaper editors and to exploit a politics of fear.”
I'm sure the second part of this quote relates to 'short sentences', not life sentences so again no mixed messages.

Edited by Stevenj214 on Sunday 18th April 14:24

davido140

9,614 posts

226 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
MX7 said:
excel789 said:
MX7 said:
excel789 said:
Vote for this lot then..http://lpuk.org/pages/about-us.php
What happens if you don't live on Devizes or Sutton and Cheam?
Nothing stopping you running for Parliament is there?
But I'm a Libertarian. We shouldn't have any MP's!

davido140 said:
Sounds st to me, you live alone, in a one bed or studio flat, couldnt fill a bin in a week if you tried, no kids, use little or no public services, but happen to earn good money.
So, a bit like Poll Tax then.

davido140 said:
a "fair" system would be paying for the services you use, and not paying for those you dont.
If people could pay for what they use, we wouldn't have any public services. We're never going to reach a situation where opting out is viable, and nor should we. There are plenty of people who need genuine assistance.
If people dont use them, why do we have them?

I'm too young to rememer how poll tax worked, I was still at school. I do know it was something of a disaster though!

Would taxing per "head" in a household would make sense? £5 a month for a preschool child, £20 when they are at school, reduced if they are in fee paying/public school. £40 a month per adult (made up numbers obviously). Extra if your bin collection in a squillion miles away (punish the rich with long drives), incentivise the chavs not to pump out kids at an alarming rate, discounts if you opt for fortnightly or montly bin collection, or none at all and take your crap to the recycling centre yourself.

Would keep a few civil servants employed to administer it.


Stevenj214

4,941 posts

228 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
davido140 said:
Would taxing per "head" in a household would make sense?
That, essentially, was the Community Charge (Poll Tax).

DSM2

3,624 posts

200 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
Wadeski said:
Clegg probably WOULD be the Tory party leader if the Tories weren't so bonkers Eurosceptic.
Yes, because Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy have done so well from the European project.
Exactly!! laugh

The Libs aren't going to get in, but they could be the reason Winky stays in number 10, if they continue to win votes.


herewego

8,814 posts

213 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
I would have thought they could pick up votes from across the spectrum and also from those who weren't going to vote following the unpleasant experience of both Tory and Labour governments. It seems to me they should have an advantage in not having any hard line left or right wingers to keep happy.

Stevenj214

4,941 posts

228 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
DSM2 said:
Fittster said:
Wadeski said:
Clegg probably WOULD be the Tory party leader if the Tories weren't so bonkers Eurosceptic.
Yes, because Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy have done so well from the European project.
Exactly!! laugh
The same Ireland which has been transformed from one of the poorest countries in the EU to one of the richest?

tamore

6,966 posts

284 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
Stevenj214 said:
DSM2 said:
Fittster said:
Wadeski said:
Clegg probably WOULD be the Tory party leader if the Tories weren't so bonkers Eurosceptic.
Yes, because Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy have done so well from the European project.
Exactly!! laugh
The same Ireland which has been transformed from one of the poorest countries in the EU to one of the richest?
eh? ireland is on the verge of bankrupcy.

Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
tamore said:
Stevenj214 said:
DSM2 said:
Fittster said:
Wadeski said:
Clegg probably WOULD be the Tory party leader if the Tories weren't so bonkers Eurosceptic.
Yes, because Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy have done so well from the European project.
Exactly!! laugh
The same Ireland which has been transformed from one of the poorest countries in the EU to one of the richest?
eh? ireland is on the verge of bankrupcy.
Remember when counting wealth in today's world you don't bother to look at the debt.

BJWoods

5,015 posts

284 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
yes

The public would quickly snap out of it and never vote for them again, when reality hits..

Short term damage, 'might' be worth it!

Guybrush

4,350 posts

206 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
raf_gti said:
Truth is I don't really trust either Labour or Conservative to fix the country and UKIP just don't really do it for me at all.
Truth is, Labour have bu66ered up the economy before and the Conservatives have fixed it. Of course you can't trust Labour to fix it, they frakked it up in the first place and are continuing to do so. Check your history and you'll see that the Conservatives will make things better. The Lib Dems have no 'solutions', just ways of turning us further into a backwater economy - do check their small print, don't just look at the gloss.