My God - people are stupid.

Author
Discussion

Somewhatfoolish

4,363 posts

186 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
Tsippy said:
sjn2004 said:
Another one of their gems is that people convicted of "minor" crimes eg assault/burglary with sentences less than 6 months will not have to go to prison. Total madness.
I bet motorists refusing to plead guilty to a speeding accusation will not be covered under that.
Correct. They won't be going to jail because you cannot be locked up for speeding in this country unless it is dangerous driving.

KANEIT

2,562 posts

219 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
LikesBikes said:
KANEIT said:
Being 'less bad' than the others is no reason to vote for them.
I think it might be. The least bad, by definition, would be the best surely?
Which is best, death by stoning, death by beheading or death by hanging? There is probably one that's preferable over the others but why vote for one when you can spoil your ballot paper and live!

The best of a bad bunch perhaps, but far from being worth endorsing with a vote. Again picking one of three stty options will only result in one of three stty outcomes.



Tsippy

15,077 posts

169 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
Somewhatfoolish said:
Tsippy said:
sjn2004 said:
Another one of their gems is that people convicted of "minor" crimes eg assault/burglary with sentences less than 6 months will not have to go to prison. Total madness.
I bet motorists refusing to plead guilty to a speeding accusation will not be covered under that.
Correct. They won't be going to jail because you cannot be locked up for speeding in this country unless it is dangerous driving.
Oh it's refusal to pay the fine that they get done for, apologies!

spud989

2,748 posts

180 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
rfisher said:
Face it - it's time to leave.
OK. Bye! byebye

LikesBikes

1,439 posts

236 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
KANEIT said:
LikesBikes said:
KANEIT said:
Being 'less bad' than the others is no reason to vote for them.
I think it might be. The least bad, by definition, would be the best surely?
Which is best, death by stoning, death by beheading or death by hanging? There is probably one that's preferable over the others but why vote for one when you can spoil your ballot paper and live!

The best of a bad bunch perhaps, but far from being worth endorsing with a vote. Again picking one of three stty options will only result in one of three stty outcomes.
By spoiling your ballot paper you let others select your method of execution, you may get the worst option - stoning.

While I see your point, regarding the least bad I didn't realise you were only giving us the option of the three main parties (well, two hehe)

I dont see how voting for the hate marmite party this year will ever see them in power in my lifetime or my kids lifetime although granted their following may slowly grow. We have to look for the best option that actually has a chanceof getting in here and now. No matter how much I want Marmite banned it won't do me any good in the year 2256 when the hate party gets its first real chance of winning an election. I know thats a stty deal for the minor parties but thats the way it is.

Somewhatfoolish

4,363 posts

186 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
Tsippy said:
Somewhatfoolish said:
Tsippy said:
sjn2004 said:
Another one of their gems is that people convicted of "minor" crimes eg assault/burglary with sentences less than 6 months will not have to go to prison. Total madness.
I bet motorists refusing to plead guilty to a speeding accusation will not be covered under that.
Correct. They won't be going to jail because you cannot be locked up for speeding in this country unless it is dangerous driving.
Oh it's refusal to pay the fine that they get done for, apologies!
Sure, but by that logic one is shot for any crime. If the state accuses me of not paying a parking fine, they're probably right, because so far as I'm concerned I don't feel like paying it. So then they will send in bailiffs. As the bailiffs will now be trying to take my property, I will physically resist, and then the st will start being kicked out of me, so then I will have to shoot them with my illegal gun*. Then there will be a gun battle, and no matter how many police marksmen I manage to take out (presumably none) I am going to end up dead. All the consequences of a parking ticket.

Now here's something you may not expect: I actually agree with that logic. But I am an extreme Libertarian who will go as far as believing one should be allowed ones private army if one wants it...

*Note: I don't really have a gun, illegal or otherwise. And I don't think I owe anyone parking fines either.

Edited by Somewhatfoolish on Saturday 17th April 01:15

KANEIT

2,562 posts

219 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
LikesBikes said:
I dont see how voting for the hate marmite party this year will ever see them in power in my lifetime or my kids lifetime although granted their following may slowly grow. We have to look for the best option that actually has a chanceof getting in here and now. No matter how much I want Marmite banned it won't do me any good in the year 2256 when the hate party gets its first real chance of winning an election. I know thats a stty deal for the minor parties but thats the way it is.
It's a shame more people didn't think like you before the Nazis rose to power in Germany, because that would have stopped change in that country that resulted in a world war. And that's not a compliment on your logic even though it sounds like one!

LikesBikes

1,439 posts

236 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
KANEIT said:
LikesBikes said:
I dont see how voting for the hate marmite party this year will ever see them in power in my lifetime or my kids lifetime although granted their following may slowly grow. We have to look for the best option that actually has a chanceof getting in here and now. No matter how much I want Marmite banned it won't do me any good in the year 2256 when the hate party gets its first real chance of winning an election. I know thats a stty deal for the minor parties but thats the way it is.
It's a shame more people didn't think like you before the Nazis rose to power in Germany, because that would have stopped change in that country that resulted in a world war. And that's not a compliment on your logic even though it sounds like one!
Actually that didn't sound like a compliment anyway.

Besides I don't see how Germans not liking Marmite would've made a difference unless Hitler pledged to ban it wink

Seriously though, whilst our individual logic differs it doesn't mean only one is right. I tend to worry more about what happens to me and my family now rather than 'for the good of the future generations' by which time me and my family from this lifetime will be long gone and so will any memory of us.

Also I'm not convinced that any of these Politicians from minor parties are any better that those of the big three. Look at Robert Kilroy-Silk, he was a proper cock-end. Every one of them from whichever party has adeep seated desire to be a leader of the ordinary people at some level or another and as such we need to be wary of them. Which brings us back to the least bad one...


Edited by LikesBikes on Saturday 17th April 02:26

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

262 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
Somewhatfoolish said:
Tsippy said:
sjn2004 said:
Another one of their gems is that people convicted of "minor" crimes eg assault/burglary with sentences less than 6 months will not have to go to prison. Total madness.
I bet motorists refusing to plead guilty to a speeding accusation will not be covered under that.
Correct. They won't be going to jail because you cannot be locked up for speeding in this country unless it is dangerous driving.
Which in a purely speeding context is just WHAT?

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
LikesBikes said:


Also I'm not convinced that any of these Politicians from minor parties are any better that those of the big three. Look at Robert Kilroy-Silk, he was a proper cock-end. Every one of them from whichever party has adeep seated desire to be a leader of the ordinary people at some level or another and as such we need to be wary of them. Which brings us back to the least bad one...


Edited by LikesBikes on Saturday 17th April 02:26
The least bad one would be this lot...http://lpuk.org/pages/about-us.php ...in my book. although they advocate the electorate having more personal responsibility which, in a country full of fkwits, means they'll never get anywhere.

groucho

12,134 posts

246 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
rfisher said:
One smiling fool looking into the camera and everyone is suddenly planning to vote for unilateral nuclear disarmament (and the rest of the Lib Dem nonsense).

I hope this happens because I feel that Labour have fked the UK so badly, that it would actually be painful to see a Tory administration trying to put things right again.

Every move they would make would be bleeted to death by hand wringing lefty cocks.

Face it - it's time to leave.

Some things can't be mended.

Leave them all to drown in their own st.
I agree.

raf_gti

4,075 posts

206 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
rfisher said:
No need to shout.

My point is that people don't seem to be capable of assessing the policies, but choose who to vote for based on their appearance and ability to perform rehearsed set-pieces to camera.

We're in deep st.

We need poeple to think hard about how to get out of it.

I don't think the Lib Dems or Labour are the answer.
I listen to both Lab/Cons and I hear nothing from either that makes me actively want to vote for them, I certainly don't think the Tories are offering the promised land of 'Al Murray' policies that many people on here seem to think they are.

However, with the Lib Dems I hear plenty of things I don't like but also plenty that I do. As a 'default' Tory voter it is proving to be a rather strange place to be right now.

rfisher

Original Poster:

5,024 posts

283 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
At the end of the day it boils down to 2 choices;

1. You are happy to be told what to do by the Government and feel that you have 'nothing to hide' so it's OK for the Government to know what it wants about you and your family. You don't expect to have to take care of yourself or your family - that's the Governments job.

2. You are an individual. You take personal responsibility for your actions. You look after your family. If you need help you expect the Government to provide it as you contribute to society and your Country.

If your general attitude is close to 1 vote Labour or Lib Dem.

If 2, vote Tory.

Yes CMD looks wet at the moment. Maybe he is. But he's intelligent and honest. His motives are genuine.

Winky is insane and dictatorial. He has no interest in this Country.

Legover is an idealist who shares unrealistic policy ideas that would damage our economy and security. I think he reckons he is a white Obama (although Obama isn't actually black, but let's not allow facts to get in the way of political exploitation).

CzechItOut

2,154 posts

191 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
Nuclear disarmament, fine, I don't have a problem with that.

sjn2004 said:
Another one of their gems is that people convicted of "minor" crimes eg assault/burglary with sentences less than 6 months will not have to go to prison. Total madness.
CMD said we should all "Hug a hoodie". Is he now saying we should lock them all up? Do you have a link to that change in policy?

Trust me, I'm a true Tory boy, but Cameron simply doesn't cut it for me. He should be stting out little Gordon Brown shaped turds every morning, but somehow he can't put that one-eyed, hapless, fkwit in his place, even after 13 years of disastrous Labour Government. This should be the most one sided election in living memory, but Dave seems to be fking it up.

Killer2005

19,643 posts

228 months

Saturday 17th April 2010
quotequote all
rfisher said:
One smiling fool looking into the camera and everyone is suddenly planning to vote for unilateral nuclear disarmament (and the rest of the Lib Dem nonsense).

I hope this happens because I feel that Labour have fked the UK so badly, that it would actually be painful to see a Tory administration trying to put things right again.

Every move they would make would be bleeted to death by hand wringing lefty cocks.

Face it - it's time to leave.

Some things can't be mended.

Leave them all to drown in their own st.
You'll enjoy this one then, a facebook group trying to get them elected

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#!/group....

Willie Dee

1,559 posts

208 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
spud989 said:
OK. Bye! byebye

Guybrush

4,350 posts

206 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
rfisher said:
One smiling fool looking into the camera and everyone is suddenly planning to vote for unilateral nuclear disarmament (and the rest of the Lib Dem nonsense).

I hope this happens because I feel that Labour have fked the UK so badly, that it would actually be painful to see a Tory administration trying to put things right again.

Every move they would make would be bleeted to death by hand wringing lefty cocks.

Face it - it's time to leave.

Some things can't be mended.

Leave them all to drown in their own st.
It's frightening isn't it. They'll vote for an image and nothing else. Peasants, simply peasants.

Don

28,377 posts

284 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
LikesBikes said:
Also I'm not convinced that any of these Politicians from minor parties are any better that those of the big three. Look at Robert Kilroy-Silk, he was a proper cock-end.
And then there's the Greens. Utter loons every last one.
The BNP - racists.
UKIP - a single policy pressure group masquerading as a party - utterly unelectable.

...and...

variations on a theme

...and...

Monster Raving Loony Party - at least these guys are cool, you could try and save the poor guy's deposit for trying to give us all a laugh...

I was utterly delighted that my 20 year old niece (NO PICS) is actually listening to the debates and reading about politics in an attempt to work out how to use her first vote. She might well negate my vote but she's thinking at least. In the end she might write "none of the above" on the paper but, hey, it's a good sign.

For my part I know the wrong lizard might get in - but at least I'll bloody the nose of the wrongest lizard.

Somewhatfoolish

4,363 posts

186 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
Somewhatfoolish said:
Tsippy said:
sjn2004 said:
Another one of their gems is that people convicted of "minor" crimes eg assault/burglary with sentences less than 6 months will not have to go to prison. Total madness.
I bet motorists refusing to plead guilty to a speeding accusation will not be covered under that.
Correct. They won't be going to jail because you cannot be locked up for speeding in this country unless it is dangerous driving.
Which in a purely speeding context is just WHAT?
No idea. I can't imagine 700mph is safe on any UK road but I can think of some where in certain circumstances 250mph would be perfectly safe so I have no clue.