SNP

[SmoothRB]

jshell said:

Bing o said:

jshell said:

Bing o said:

thinfourth2 said:

Is it any wonder that the folk in the highlands of Scotland are a little bit pissed off at paying £1:30 a litre for fuel and 4x4s are taxed to stupid because some little ex fking politics student think we should all take the tube.

Erm, no, it's £1.30 a litre because we've been saddled with a load of failed solicitors from Jockland who have destroyed our economy.

And the problem is that they are Scottish? ...or failed solicitors?

The problem is slagging off Londoncentric policies when the policies have been made by the PM and the Chancellor, who are both Scottish.

Their Scottishness has gone, they've sold their souls to the corrupt god of Westminster. And, we really don't want the s back.

What is 'Scottishness' anyway?

[jshell]

SmoothRB said:

jshell said:

Bing o said:

jshell said:

Bing o said:

thinfourth2 said:

Is it any wonder that the folk in the highlands of Scotland are a little bit pissed off at paying £1:30 a litre for fuel and 4x4s are taxed to stupid because some little ex fking politics student think we should all take the tube.

Erm, no, it's £1.30 a litre because we've been saddled with a load of failed solicitors from Jockland who have destroyed our economy.

And the problem is that they are Scottish? ...or failed solicitors?

The problem is slagging off Londoncentric policies when the policies have been made by the PM and the Chancellor, who are both Scottish.

Their Scottishness has gone, they've sold their souls to the corrupt god of Westminster. And, we really don't want the s back.

What is 'Scottishness' anyway?

Feck knows, but these soft Southern shytes always throw it up as a reason for Brown's uselessness! I don't believe his failures are due to his nationality... :shrug:

[OnTheOverrun]

fluffnik said:

ninja-lewis said:

But it's a very tricky constitutional problem I think, to which there is probably no straightforward answer but to muddle through by developing new Parliamentary conventions.

There's a very simple solution: dissolve the UK.

Which would result in Scotland immediately coming under the dead hand of unelected EU control.

You've not thought that one out properly have you?

[Incredible Sulk]

OnTheOverrun said:

fluffnik said:

ninja-lewis said:

But it's a very tricky constitutional problem I think, to which there is probably no straightforward answer but to muddle through by developing new Parliamentary conventions.

There's a very simple solution: dissolve the UK.

Which would result in Scotland immediately coming under the dead hand of unelected EU control.

You've not thought that one out properly have you?

I suspect he has thought it through. The dead hand of unelected EU Control as opposed to the dead hand of Westminster control. Hmmm. Tough call that.

[OnTheOverrun]

Incredible Sulk said:

OnTheOverrun said:

fluffnik said:

ninja-lewis said:

But it's a very tricky constitutional problem I think, to which there is probably no straightforward answer but to muddle through by developing new Parliamentary conventions.

There's a very simple solution: dissolve the UK.

Which would result in Scotland immediately coming under the dead hand of unelected EU control.

You've not thought that one out properly have you?

I suspect he has thought it through. The dead hand of unelected EU Control as opposed to the dead hand of Westminster control. Hmmm. Tough call that.

Not for an anarchist like fluffnik, more a case of frying pan into fire!

[fluffnik]

OnTheOverrun said:

Not for an anarchist like fluffnik, more a case of frying pan into fire!

...except the status quo features two dead hands - UK & EU.

I like the idea of a border free Europe too.