N. Korea - will they , or won't they?
Discussion
KANEIT said:
Jimbeaux said:
KANEIT said:
Tsippy said:
....People hint that China may help North Korea, however I have my doubts because their manufacturing is reliant on the West.....
And the West is reliant on their manufacturing? It's a 2 way thing now, China is no longer a slave to us.KANEIT said:
Jimbeaux said:
KANEIT said:
Tsippy said:
....People hint that China may help North Korea, however I have my doubts because their manufacturing is reliant on the West.....
And the West is reliant on their manufacturing? It's a 2 way thing now, China is no longer a slave to us.Jimbeaux said:
KANEIT said:
Jimbeaux said:
KANEIT said:
Tsippy said:
....People hint that China may help North Korea, however I have my doubts because their manufacturing is reliant on the West.....
And the West is reliant on their manufacturing? It's a 2 way thing now, China is no longer a slave to us.Jimbeaux said:
That is true. However, what really do they make that we must right away? There are some things surely; however,I wager those things are readily available elsewhere but at a higher cost.
They have been buying up rare earth metal deposits all over the place. But then all the US needs to do it re-open the Mountain Pass mine in anycase. KANEIT said:
Tsippy said:
KANEIT said:
Tsippy said:
KANEIT said:
Tsippy said:
....People hint that China may help North Korea, however I have my doubts because their manufacturing is reliant on the West.....
And the West is reliant on their manufacturing? It's a 2 way thing now, China is no longer a slave to us.Although the manufacturing industry has taken a battering, it is more than capable of growing again.
I take it you have little experience of manufacturing business?
Roll up roll up, its east vs west (or in this case North vs South) in the final battle for the end of the world! Bring your friends (and especially your enemies).
IF Keeerrrazy Kim did do anything, is it not more likley that while everyones attention is focused on the Koreas that instead of backing what would definately be the wrong horse, China would pop across the straights of Taiwan claiming then for her own and use the NK situation as leverage to stay there? whether the west would accept that who knows, might be worth the gamble in Chinas eyes rather than directly helping NK.
Besides, the BBC constantly referes to Taiwan as Chinese Taipei (yes I know taiwan calls itself Taipei), it's almost as if theyre preparing us for it! Either that or the BBC are a bunch of commies? Surely not.
Nothing will happen, its Kim craving attention again.
IF Keeerrrazy Kim did do anything, is it not more likley that while everyones attention is focused on the Koreas that instead of backing what would definately be the wrong horse, China would pop across the straights of Taiwan claiming then for her own and use the NK situation as leverage to stay there? whether the west would accept that who knows, might be worth the gamble in Chinas eyes rather than directly helping NK.
Besides, the BBC constantly referes to Taiwan as Chinese Taipei (yes I know taiwan calls itself Taipei), it's almost as if theyre preparing us for it! Either that or the BBC are a bunch of commies? Surely not.
Nothing will happen, its Kim craving attention again.
Tsippy said:
KANEIT said:
Tsippy said:
KANEIT said:
Tsippy said:
KANEIT said:
Tsippy said:
....People hint that China may help North Korea, however I have my doubts because their manufacturing is reliant on the West.....
And the West is reliant on their manufacturing? It's a 2 way thing now, China is no longer a slave to us.Although the manufacturing industry has taken a battering, it is more than capable of growing again.
I take it you have little experience of manufacturing business?
Not all manufacturing in China has gone that way. I have seen some real crap come out of there, primarily with cast brass components where the Chinese have been left to their own devices, but if you install a British management team in the Chinese factory you can promote better working practices and improve quality. It depends partly on the complexity of the product too. Shower enclosures - glass, silicone and extruded alloy sections with a few bits of chrome effect plastic and simple runners, easy peasy simple components, you can end up with the same quality of product than one made in Ireland for example, just got to keep their anodising and glass quality in check. You've got to keep your eye on them.
My main gripe with what you said was, quite flippantly, i.e. we/the U.S/the West can go to war with NK and there will be no problem with transferring all our China based product elsewhere, just like that, simples............NOT.
Have owned my own manufacturing company and currently working as a trouble shooter for varying engineering firms hence my experience of Chinese rubbish.
My experience has been with their attempts at Precision Engineering, which is quite frankly pathetic. So I guess we're looking at it from two sides, you from their more basic functions and me from their attempts at advanced engineering. I agree they can do the basics, but complex work leaves a lot to be desired out there still, even with a British engineering team overseeing them (usually because as soon as their backs are turned the results are fudged!)
My experience has been with their attempts at Precision Engineering, which is quite frankly pathetic. So I guess we're looking at it from two sides, you from their more basic functions and me from their attempts at advanced engineering. I agree they can do the basics, but complex work leaves a lot to be desired out there still, even with a British engineering team overseeing them (usually because as soon as their backs are turned the results are fudged!)
Edited by Tsippy on Friday 23 July 21:40
Tsippy said:
Have owned my own manufacturing company and currently working as a trouble shooter for varying engineering firms hence my experience of Chinese rubbish.
My experience has been with their attempts at Precision Engineering, which is quite frankly pathetic. So I guess we're looking at it from two sides, you from their more basic functions and me from their attempts at advanced engineering. I agree they can do the basics, but complex work leaves a lot to be desired out there still, even with a British engineering team overseeing them (usually because as soon as their backs are turned the results are fudged!)
But there are many basic components and products that they make and we need and no longer have the setup to make ourselves. I agree though I would not want them making Wolls-Woyce jet engines.My experience has been with their attempts at Precision Engineering, which is quite frankly pathetic. So I guess we're looking at it from two sides, you from their more basic functions and me from their attempts at advanced engineering. I agree they can do the basics, but complex work leaves a lot to be desired out there still, even with a British engineering team overseeing them (usually because as soon as their backs are turned the results are fudged!)
Edited by Tsippy on Friday 23 July 21:40
A threat to China is the rise of companies in Eastern Europe (places such as Hungary and Slovakia) where they are getting the benefit of European engineers plus reduced transport costs. I don't think it would be too hard to move production away from China though, as eventhough the workforce is in a manufacturing plant, they are mostly unskilled labour and something that's not in short supply in Eastern Europe.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10748...
I wonder what they mean by 'sacred war' ?
It wouldn't be a war would it? just the end of NK.
I wonder what they mean by 'sacred war' ?
It wouldn't be a war would it? just the end of NK.
DAVEVO9 said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10748...
I wonder what they mean by 'sacred war' ?
It wouldn't be a war would it? just the end of NK.
Oh 4uck, Cuba again. Except this weeks "great leader" doesn't have the understanding of the losses of the great patriotic war to hold him back.I wonder what they mean by 'sacred war' ?
It wouldn't be a war would it? just the end of NK.
Really, this is f-off serious now, even conventionally, the losses to the south would be staggering, never mind the move to chemical/biological artillery rounds.
Seoul and it's environs would cease to exist.
The casualties would be staggering.
Imagine this..
reduced to this...
.
North Korea says it will use its "nuclear deterrent" in response to joint US-South Korean military exercises this weekend.
Pyongyang was ready to launch a "retaliatory sacred war" at any time, the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) said.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10748...
And as for their stty artillery, "Quality over quantity but quantity has a quality all of its own."
Oh and for it being a suicide attack? Wouldnt really stop the North Korean leadership, they are usually quite happy to send commandos on suicide trips into the south.
Pyongyang was ready to launch a "retaliatory sacred war" at any time, the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) said.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10748...
And as for their stty artillery, "Quality over quantity but quantity has a quality all of its own."
Oh and for it being a suicide attack? Wouldnt really stop the North Korean leadership, they are usually quite happy to send commandos on suicide trips into the south.
Edited by Mr Dave on Saturday 24th July 08:52
superkartracer said:
Frankeh said:
NK fires at the south using its stty artillery.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9b44fd30ac49d58176d74d2962680917.101Two hours to flatten the place, yes they can't win but they could certainly do some serious damage.
given the 30 minutes they would hae before the US flattened them with air strikes, id say they wouldnt be able to flatten the place.
Castrol Craig said:
superkartracer said:
Frankeh said:
NK fires at the south using its stty artillery.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9b44fd30ac49d58176d74d2962680917.101Two hours to flatten the place, yes they can't win but they could certainly do some serious damage.
given the 30 minutes they would hae before the US flattened them with air strikes, id say they wouldnt be able to flatten the place.
From the book that I have been reading (some book about the secret war with Iran or similar, not sure who it's by), N Korea may be screwed in terms of its population starving, but they do/did have money from Russia and now China - money that, instead of investing in their populace, they put into weapons, so don't imagine that all their munitions are rubbish tat. Plenty of relatively good stuff available on the black market from what I read, and probably the money to get it if you are really dedicated to get it. According to this book N Korea are key because if they get away with 'playing up' it may encourage problem what we call extremist groups/countries to try the same. So you need to respond.. But not enough to start a war.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff