How would you deal with this young scamp?

[tinman0]

[Marf]

roguesthesky said:

he admitted to his offences that he committed, i think its a cry for help that he wanted to be help to stop him offending

600 burglaries are a cry for help?

[monthefish]

roguesthesky said:

the police didnt give him a chance to live his life and change,

Not even after burglary number 176?

I'm pretty sure after burglary number 223 he was given the chance to stop committing crime (or perhaps it was number 233 - I get confused).

Number 365 could easily have been a turning point, as was 437.


etc

etc



STOP COMMITIING CRIME YOU SH!TBAG!

[perdu]

Marf said:

roguesthesky said:

he admitted to his offences that he committed, i think its a cry for help that he wanted to be help to stop him offending

600 burglaries are a cry for help?

no

breaking in to my house

that would be a cry for help

but very sharply cut off

[roguesthesky]

grumbledoak said:

It seems the 'orrible little has a friend.

a friend that was back in primary school, i havent known him since i was 11. I know what he did was wrong, but you got to understand why he committed these crimes, no one has asked that.. if someone keeps cheating on there partners you'd be asking why do they keep cheating, or if someone keeps raping someone you'd ask why.
A one off offence you'd understand but he kept re doing the same offences, and no one as sat there and asked why is he doing these things. they just kept sentencing him and re booting his community order.

[Marf]

roguesthesky said:

but you got to understand why he committed these crimes, no one has asked that

OK, I'll bite. Why did he commit these crimes?

[roguesthesky]

Marf said:

roguesthesky said:

he admitted to his offences that he committed, i think its a cry for help that he wanted to be help to stop him offending

600 burglaries are a cry for help?

yes, if your son or daughter kept being naughty you'd ask why... after time and time you kept punishing them.
its wanting attention from the parent. if you punish them and just ignore them there going to do the same thing again, you need to sit and listen to the person.

[roguesthesky]

the last time he committed a crime was in witham, when he was sent to the community order in the area, the police were following him , so he gave the police what they wanted to see, pick a brick up and throw it throw the window.

if you was trying to change your life around and you had police constantly kicking your door down and following you, you'd retaliate! `

[roguesthesky]

Marf said:

roguesthesky said:

but you got to understand why he committed these crimes, no one has asked that

OK, I'll bite. Why did he commit these crimes?

Well i dont know, thats what im trying to say no one has asked that question not one person in authority..
if he was a bad person he wouldnt be admitting to these crimes, he admitted to crimes that police didnt even charge him for.

[Marf]

roguesthesky said:

the last time he committed a crime was in witham, when he was sent to the community order in the area, the police were following him , so he gave the police what they wanted to see, pick a brick up and throw it throw the window.

Awww, poor widdle chav.

Wake up chap. The only person that threw that brick was your one man crime wave of a mate.

You sound like Raoul Moat's supporters. Wake up and smell your bullst.

[Marf]

roguesthesky said:

Marf said:

roguesthesky said:

but you got to understand why he committed these crimes, no one has asked that

OK, I'll bite. Why did he commit these crimes?

Well i dont know, thats what im trying to say no one has asked that question not one person in authority..
if he was a bad person he wouldnt be admitting to these crimes, he admitted to crimes that police didnt even charge him for.

You know, you're not doing a very good job of painting your mate in a positive light. He just sounds like a right berkeley hunt.

[roguesthesky]

everyone is being so judgemental and making opinions of there own, im sure if it was a family member or a friend you knew, you'd have a different opinion.

I know what he has done was wrong, but its a serious matter, no one has asked after the 100th offence why... they just think we give him more hours so he can pay back time.
All police are interested in is convicting people... and then they think there doing there job, whether or not they must of realised after a while this person is still committing the same offences, they needed to have a open mind and asked why.
if someone asked Bradley why and gave him the time of the day without judging him, im sure they would of found the source of why he is committing these offences!

[monthefish]

Marf said:

Awww, poor widdle chav.

Wake up chap. The only person that threw that brick was your one man crime wave of a mate.

You sound like Raoul Moat's supporters. Wake up and smell your bullst.

Nicely put.

[Marf]

roguesthesky said:

if someone asked Bradley why and gave him the time of the day without judging him, im sure they would of found the source of why he is committing these offences!

Well why don't you do us all a favour and go and ask Bradley why he felt the need to violate the privacy and sanctity of 600 homes, then report back to us what your little friend has to say for himself?

Off you pop

[munroman]

Marf said:

roguesthesky said:

if someone asked Bradley why and gave him the time of the day without judging him, im sure they would of found the source of why he is committing these offences!

Well why don't you do us all a favour and go and ask Bradley why he felt the need to violate the privacy and sanctity of 600 homes, then report back to us what your little friend has to say for himself?

Off you pop

It may have escaped your attention that pretty much the rest of the world does not go about breaking into people's houses, and certainly not 600 times, so perhaps the Police are not the issue in this case, rather Bradley, though I find your loyalty to him touching, and I hope none of your family have their homes violated by scrotes like him.

If a known perp is seen by anyone, strangely they do attract attention, I hope that the prison does give him the wake up call he clearly needs, it would be really unfortunate that a terrified householder, feeling threatened, pulled out a shotgun and perforated him whilst defending his property, that would cause such a mess to the plasterwork.

[tinman0]

roguesthesky said:

I know what he has done was wrong, but its a serious matter, no one has asked after the 100th offence why... they just think we give him more hours so he can pay back time.

It's long past asking him why he's doing it, its called growing up.

roguesthesky said:

All police are interested in is convicting people... and then they think there doing there job, whether or not they must of realised after a while this person is still committing the same offences, they needed to have a open mind and asked why.

It's what Police do - catch criminals.

roguesthesky said:

if someone asked Bradley why and gave him the time of the day without judging him, im sure they would of found the source of why he is committing these offences!

The source of these offenses can easily be fixed with a bullet in his temple. He's not a victim, the 600+ people he thieved off are the victims.

Edited by tinman0 on Thursday 5th August 16:08

[Halb]

roguesthesky said:

I know what he did was wrong, but you got to understand why he committed these crimes, no one has asked that..

Because he is a workshy scrote who has no respect for his fellow citizens and likes to destroy people homes/valuables?

roguesthesky said:

the last time he committed a crime was in witham, when he was sent to the community order in the area, the police were following him , so he gave the police what they wanted to see, pick a brick up and throw it throw the window.
if you was trying to change your life around and you had police constantly kicking your door down and following you, you'd retaliate! `

Or a person who really wants to rehabilitate himself will do just that, and not throw the brick?
As MArf says you are not doing a good job of defending him.

Maybe if he gets released early he can burgle Tony Martins house, or someone else with a shotgun, and nature will take its course?

[Neil H]

roguesthesky said:

everyone is being so judgemental and making opinions of there own, im sure if it was a family member or a friend you knew, you'd have a different opinion.

Do you think the people being burgled might have a different opinion?

What about them?

Have you even considered his victims while spewing forth this sickening and utterly flimsy defence?

10 years hard labour in a mine; that'll teach the little a lesson.

[AJS-]

600 offenses, six hundred. That's a lot of misery for a lot of people.

And he's already been given a chance. Do we really want him back out in 5 years? Why? Is there any reason to believe he will reform?

I would say 30 years minimum. His life should be over.

[FourWheelDrift]

roguesthesky said:

I think all your comments are just not nice, you've all got a opinion on him from what you have read in the newspaper and what you have seen in the news, i went to school with this boy from a young age, he is a kind person, i know what he has done is wrong and it is fair that he got given this sentence, but at the end of the day he's not a murderer or a rapist, these things he has stolen can be replaced, i know its not nice when someone cheats and steals from you.
he admitted to his offences that he committed, i think its a cry for help that he wanted to be help to stop him offending, and even though they did this, but the police didnt, they followed him, everywhere, kicked his door down, he was on tag, ect. the police didnt give him a chance to live his life and change, when all the time there arresting you for things you havent done.

i think most of your comments on here saying he should be dead ect. is wrong and un justified you dont know him so dont judge him

After reading your post I have to re-assess my judgement and realise now that 300 years penal servitude might have been wrong.

A single bullet to the head would be much cheaper.