The Tax System (explained in beer)

The Tax System (explained in beer)

Author
Discussion

Darlo74

Original Poster:

284 posts

210 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
This sums up my thoughts perfectly...

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this;

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1
The sixth would pay $3
The seventh would pay $7
The eighth would pay $12
The ninth would pay $18
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do..

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball.
"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20". Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.
So the first four men were unaffected.
They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers?

How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? They realised that $20 divided by six is $3.33.
But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving," declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got $10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!"
"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison, "we didn't get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works.

The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction..

Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.

In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
Interesting, I've never seen this before...........
paperbag
Sidicks

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

213 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
I think you'll find the tenth man doesn't drink any of the beer but drinks wine elsewhere and pays for that separately. He does however still pay the vast share of the beer bill.

Asterix

24,438 posts

229 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
I think you'll find the tenth man doesn't drink any of the beer but drinks wine elsewhere and pays for that separately. He does however still pay the vast share of the beer bill.
I've seen the above quite a few times but your little add on is perhaps the most pertinent comment I've seen added to it. Right on the money.

BOR

4,717 posts

256 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
And if levels of wealth weren't so spectacularly polarised, everyone could pay a similar amount for their beer.

bob1179

14,107 posts

210 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
Asterix said:
CaptainSlow said:
I think you'll find the tenth man doesn't drink any of the beer but drinks wine elsewhere and pays for that separately. He does however still pay the vast share of the beer bill.
I've seen the above quite a few times but your little add on is perhaps the most pertinent comment I've seen added to it. Right on the money.
Definitely.

Though I haven't seen tax explained this way before. I really liked the analogy.

smile

TEKNOPUG

19,001 posts

206 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
If they didn't spend so much time drinking beer they could've worked out that the $20 saving should be split by the percentage that they pay.

5th = $.20 pays $.80
6th = $.60 pays $2.40
7th = $1.40 pays $5.60
8th = $2.40 pays $9.60
9th = $3.60 pays $14.40
10th = $11.80 pays $47.20

Stupid pissheads

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

213 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
TEKNOPUG said:
If they didn't spend so much time drinking beer they could've worked out that the $20 saving should be split by the percentage that they pay.

5th = $.20 pays $.80
6th = $.60 pays $2.40
7th = $1.40 pays $5.60
8th = $2.40 pays $9.60
9th = $3.60 pays $14.40
10th = $11.80 pays $47.20

Stupid pissheads
I'm thinking they should just drink more beer.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
TEKNOPUG said:
If they didn't spend so much time drinking beer they could've worked out that the $20 saving should be split by the percentage that they pay.

5th = $.20 pays $.80
6th = $.60 pays $2.40
7th = $1.40 pays $5.60
8th = $2.40 pays $9.60
9th = $3.60 pays $14.40
10th = $11.80 pays $47.20

Stupid pissheads
I'm thinking they should just drink more beer.
I'm thinking if they're still drinking beer now compared to when I first saw this half of them will now be dead from liver disease.

Petrolhead_Rich

4,659 posts

193 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
This is soo true!

thumbup

TEKNOPUG

19,001 posts

206 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
I wouldn't drink with people that couldn't afford a round anyway.

TankRizzo

7,296 posts

194 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
Guess the bar owner would be a bit pissed off as well that he was a dollar short every day...the new amounts add up to 79 dollars.

srebbe64

13,021 posts

238 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
The tenth person would be in Dubai or Monaco or some such Tax haven and could pay for the other nine to come over and buy them all drinks and still be quids in!

jagracer

8,248 posts

237 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
The way I always thought it worked is that the 6th, 7th and 8th paid $3, $7 and $12 respectively but as they were mid earners wouldn't be eligible for any beer.





Edited by jagracer on Friday 15th October 14:54

JonRB

74,802 posts

273 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
I've seen it before loads of times, but it's still really good.

I very much like this quotation though:
Darlo74 said:
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
Edited by JonRB on Friday 15th October 15:41

550Hep

3,135 posts

218 months

Friday 15th October 2010
quotequote all
srebbe64 said:
The tenth person would be in Dubai or Monaco or some such Tax haven and could pay for the other nine to come over and buy them all drinks and still be quids in!
Sorry but tw4t!

Why oh fu*king why is it so abhorrent in our society to obtain success and then when you do is there some sort of social imperative to "give back"? I am not say you ought not and should not I am questioning the outrageous situation we have where it is foisted upon you in a format so given by "others".




Willie Dee

1,559 posts

209 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
550Hep said:
srebbe64 said:
The tenth person would be in Dubai or Monaco or some such Tax haven and could pay for the other nine to come over and buy them all drinks and still be quids in!
Sorry but tw4t!

Why oh fu*king why is it so abhorrent in our society to obtain success and then when you do is there some sort of social imperative to "give back"? I am not say you ought not and should not I am questioning the outrageous situation we have where it is foisted upon you in a format so given by "others".
Because these days, more and more, success is not determined by hard work, but more by luck. Who your parents are should not be the almost exclusive deciding fate in life.

Because the wealthy benefit massively from living in a society where everyone is well fed and healthy.

Diderot

7,368 posts

193 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
Willie Dee said:
550Hep said:
srebbe64 said:
The tenth person would be in Dubai or Monaco or some such Tax haven and could pay for the other nine to come over and buy them all drinks and still be quids in!
Sorry but tw4t!

Why oh fu*king why is it so abhorrent in our society to obtain success and then when you do is there some sort of social imperative to "give back"? I am not say you ought not and should not I am questioning the outrageous situation we have where it is foisted upon you in a format so given by "others".
Because these days, more and more, success is not determined by hard work, but more by luck. Who your parents are should not be the almost exclusive deciding fate in life.

Because the wealthy benefit massively from living in a society where everyone is well fed and healthy.
That's right Willie, it was never like that in the past. No. How much did you have to drink? biggrin

Edited by Diderot on Saturday 16th October 09:34

zac510

5,546 posts

207 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
JonRB said:
I very much like this quotation though:
Darlo74 said:
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
I hate it, it just reeks of arrogance and condescension. I've had it used on me once by somebody who did not want to not to accept my (perfectly valid) needs, only naively and stubbornly accept that he was the only one that could be right. If you want to make yourself sound like an up yourself, superior tt then use it by all means!

Tiggsy

10,261 posts

253 months

Saturday 16th October 2010
quotequote all
Willie Dee said:
550Hep said:
srebbe64 said:
The tenth person would be in Dubai or Monaco or some such Tax haven and could pay for the other nine to come over and buy them all drinks and still be quids in!
Sorry but tw4t!

Why oh fu*king why is it so abhorrent in our society to obtain success and then when you do is there some sort of social imperative to "give back"? I am not say you ought not and should not I am questioning the outrageous situation we have where it is foisted upon you in a format so given by "others".
Because these days, more and more, success is not determined by hard work, but more by luck. Who your parents are should not be the almost exclusive deciding fate in life.

Because the wealthy benefit massively from living in a society where everyone is well fed and healthy.
Luck? Your parents?

What tosh...talk about getting your excuses in early.

It doesn't matter whether you are talking about a high flying lawyer or a popstar.....99.9999% of the time there is huge personal effort that has been required to get them where they are. It may make life's loosers feel better about themselves to write of others successes as a fluke, but it's rarely ever true. (unless you're a loto winner....who are 99.9999% poor people up till that point, because successfull people DONT chase luck with loto tickets)