Your views on altering daylight hours

Your views on altering daylight hours

Poll: Your views on altering daylight hours

Total Members Polled: 248

For: 57%
Against: 43%
Author
Discussion

strudel

5,888 posts

228 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
No sorry. GMT all year round. Have people just not considered starting work earlier? Amounts to the same thing...

F i F

44,230 posts

252 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
This discussion just irritates the hell out of me. You have the daylight you do because of geographical location.

If you get a lot of dark, as we do in Sweden you do different things to what you do in the summer when we have almost no dark and you make your working day the hours to suit what you do for a living.

Leave the bloody clock alone ffs. Clowns.


thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Yet again the thickies will be out who think that altering the clocks will give more daylight

In winter you have 6 hours daylight and the work day is 8 hours long it is not posible to go to work and come home again in daylight unless you start work at 3pm and finish at 10am

shirt

22,663 posts

202 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
i voted yes.

the winter commute to work is done almost in the dark already, and when i'm in the office i couldn't care less what its like outside. i'd like a little time in daylight when i get home.

also. the cost benefit to major industry would be immense. large users are charged double rates between 4-6pm [it differs, usually just for a 1hr period] due to people coming home and sticking all the lights & sockets on. i've worked in places where it's cheaper to shut down all production on a 600acre site than it is to pay the increased electic bill.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
And can we have an option in the poll that sayes i don't give a fk i live in northern scotland its dark all the bloody time

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

187 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
We can't alter daylight hours, all we can do is alter what time we say it is when it's light. Leave the clocks alone and if necessary change your working hours to suit you better.
+1.

I honestly wonder if some of the proponents of altering hours (not here) think it makes the day longer.

qube_TA

8,402 posts

246 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
shirt said:
i voted yes.

the winter commute to work is done almost in the dark already, and when i'm in the office i couldn't care less what its like outside. i'd like a little time in daylight when i get home.
What time do you get home from work?


Saddle bum

4,211 posts

220 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Bill said:
Saddle bum said:
On the whole, having lighter nights is preferable to the majority of the population, plus all the indirect benefits.
Is it, or is that just wishful thinking?
Yes. (Not just WT)

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

187 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
So get up earlier and ask your boss if you can start and finish earlier.

That's what my co workers and I did.

eharding

13,763 posts

285 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
Einion Yrth said:
We can't alter daylight hours, all we can do is alter what time we say it is when it's light. Leave the clocks alone and if necessary change your working hours to suit you better.
+1.

I honestly wonder if some of the proponents of altering hours (not here) think it makes the day longer.
No, really, they can.

I saw a documentary about it - huge space-borne mirrors that redirect sunlight onto the Northern Hemisphere in winter allow crop growing all year round.

"Project Icarus" it was called.

It all went horribly wrong when it was hijacked by some North Korean geezer with diamonds in his face, who used it to try and fry an MI6 agent on a frozen lake by concentrating the beam of sunlight, and was then going to use it to destroy the South Korean forces along the de-militarised zone, allowing the North Koreans to invade.

Thankfully, there was a bit of a scuffle on a transport plane between the MI6 agent and the Korean type with the diamonds in his face (which he'd had removed, and had a bit of work done round the eyes), and the Korean chap ended up being electrocuted, and then going through the engine of the transport (can't remember the type, Eric might know). The MI6 agent then went off with some American bird.

It was on the Discovery Channel a while back, I think.

So yes, perfectly feasible to change the length of the day for Scottish farmers, but, as usual, the North Koreans buggered it up for them.


qube_TA

8,402 posts

246 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Saddle bum said:
Bill said:
Saddle bum said:
On the whole, having lighter nights is preferable to the majority of the population, plus all the indirect benefits.
Is it, or is that just wishful thinking?
Yes. (Not just WT)
To have a light evening in Winter in the UK you'd have to move the clocks forward at least 4-5 hours.

On the 1st of December the sun sets at about 15:55 and it rises about 7:50, so you've got around 8 hours of daylight per day to play with.

I reckon most people get home from work about 6PM, so if you wanted 1 hour of daylight to enjoy when you got home then you'd have to set your clock so that it did not get light until 11AM. It would however still be cold and wet as it's Winter so you'd still not want to go outside for that hour anyway.




Mojooo

12,779 posts

181 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Its easier to adjust the clock than it is for peopel to adjust their working hours. The vast majority of people cannot just adjust their working hours on a whim

Funkateer

990 posts

176 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Mr Gearchange said:
Ridiculous situation to appease Scottish farmers at the potential risk of schoolchildren.
Bloody schoolchildren, attacking farmers in the dark, nicking all the crops!

choptop

514 posts

211 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
The rest of the 'Old Empire' put there clocks back as well. Is this really of benefit to Canada, Singapore etc etc???

Timberwolf

5,348 posts

219 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Keeping the clocks as they are gives lazy journalists two "free" stories per year as they bring this up in some form or another every time the clocks change. While changing the clocks would give them new stories to tell, they would have to actually write those stories rather than copying and pasting an article from the "October 2009" folder to the "October 2010" folder and changing a couple of dates as per the current situation.

On that basis, I think we should keep things as they are.

Semi hemi

1,796 posts

199 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Hang on a minute... did the time in the UK not only get "standardised" due to the railways and the working out of the Train timetables?
Nowadays people fly probably further and more often than people in the 1800s took trains. When you get your itinary for your flight from the UK to the US and you depart at 1200, land at 1500 but you know the flight takes 6/7 hours this isn't too much of problem for most folk to get their head round.

So maybe its time we got back to having our own local times set as per our geographic location.
So when its, say 1900pm in London it would be 1800pm in Bristol, 1930pm in Hull and 1950 in Newcastle;)

Newfoundland is in a different time zone to the rest of the Eastern seaboard, half an hour difference. due to it being on the Eastern extremity but also to its Northerly position. Admittedly they are all barking there


motco

15,988 posts

247 months

Saturday 30th October 2010
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
Its easier to adjust the clock than it is for peopel to adjust their working hours. The vast majority of people cannot just adjust their working hours on a whim
Altering a clock to make it lighter is as futile as altering the calendar to make it warmer!

It's mid day when the sun is at it's highest point - noon. How can that be wrong?

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

243 months

Saturday 30th October 2010
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Yet again the thickies will be out who think that altering the clocks will give more daylight

In winter you have 6 hours daylight and the work day is 8 hours long it is not posible to go to work and come home again in daylight unless you start work at 3pm and finish at 10am
Or start at 7 and finish at 3

cymtriks

4,560 posts

246 months

Saturday 30th October 2010
quotequote all
Digga said:
As I see it, the advantages of having more daylight at the end of the day far outweight the arguments against.
Debateable.

  1. Road safety, especially for kids coming home from school.
What about kids going to school?

  1. Greater opportunity for sporting activities.
In winter any evening event is going to be lit up.

  1. So we should (generally be healthier) and less succeptible to depression and illness.
Why not get up two hours earlier and be even healthier? Or is this just not true?

  1. More chance of doing well in international and olympic sports.
Rubbish.

  1. Save energy on lighting.
Does lighting in the morning cost more or less than lighting in the evening? No.


Can't see any of the above comes at a great cost. Anecdotally, although there are plenty of people up and about - on the roads - early in the day (like me), who might be slightly disadvantaged, there are far more about later on who would benefit.

See above. Why would they benefit?

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Saturday 30th October 2010
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
thinfourth2 said:
Yet again the thickies will be out who think that altering the clocks will give more daylight

In winter you have 6 hours daylight and the work day is 8 hours long it is not posible to go to work and come home again in daylight unless you start work at 3pm and finish at 10am
Or start at 7 and finish at 3
Still very dark at 7am up here in the winter

But in summer it is still light at 11pm