Obama the hippocrit

Author
Discussion

Muntu

7,635 posts

200 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
Bing o said:
He does look somewhat like the first lady, doesn't he?
I sometimes feel sorry for the Chicago Jesus:

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
Victor McDade said:
To those who are sure Obama is indeed a 'lame duck', he's available at the betting exchanges as favourite to be next president (at 10/11). Lay away and make yourself some cash.
Obama will win again in all likelihood. He has rebounded nicely and even when his poll numbers were low they still showed that he would win when opposed by Palin, Romney, Pawlenty et al...... The GOP have nobody who is anywhere near credible as an alternative.
I strongly disagree if ran against some of those. Where do you get that?

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
TEKNOPUG said:
Jimbeaux for President.
You would be pleasantly shocked how moderate I would govern. wink

Tadite

560 posts

185 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
unrepentant said:
Victor McDade said:
To those who are sure Obama is indeed a 'lame duck', he's available at the betting exchanges as favourite to be next president (at 10/11). Lay away and make yourself some cash.
Obama will win again in all likelihood. He has rebounded nicely and even when his poll numbers were low they still showed that he would win when opposed by Palin, Romney, Pawlenty et al...... The GOP have nobody who is anywhere near credible as an alternative.
I strongly disagree if ran against some of those. Where do you get that?
Real Clear Politics for the most part. None of these presidential run polls should be taken as gospel but that's correct for the most part. Obama wins in all the current polls v. election and is about past 50% total job approval which is a good 7 point turnaround.

davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I think the Republican party is going to reap what they have sown at the next election. The Tea Party has taken over the GOP and I don't think the nation sees Palin as presidential. So unless something happens to make Clinton run in the primary, I think he'll make it to two terms.

tinman0

18,231 posts

241 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
tinman0 said:
davepoth said:
Well, Obama is months away from winning in Cuba, something that 52 years' worth of presidents have failed to do. As it turns out all that he had to do was be nice. Mad eh?
Winning what?
The "war" against Communism. And amusingly, all they needed to do was allow free trade...
Cuba trades with the rest of the world, why should trading with the US make any difference to Communism or Cuba?

RV8

1,570 posts

172 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Perhaps he's after another Nobel to stick on the mantlepiece, he did bog all for the last one.

Edited by RV8 on Friday 21st January 00:27

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Tadite said:
Jimbeaux said:
unrepentant said:
Victor McDade said:
To those who are sure Obama is indeed a 'lame duck', he's available at the betting exchanges as favourite to be next president (at 10/11). Lay away and make yourself some cash.
Obama will win again in all likelihood. He has rebounded nicely and even when his poll numbers were low they still showed that he would win when opposed by Palin, Romney, Pawlenty et al...... The GOP have nobody who is anywhere near credible as an alternative.
I strongly disagree if ran against some of those. Where do you get that?
Real Clear Politics for the most part. None of these presidential run polls should be taken as gospel but that's correct for the most part. Obama wins in all the current polls v. election and is about past 50% total job approval which is a good 7 point turnaround.
I give that 4 weeks. This man is finished.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
I think the Republican party is going to reap what they have sown at the next election. The Tea Party has taken over the GOP and I don't think the nation sees Palin as presidential. So unless something happens to make Clinton run in the primary, I think he'll make it to two terms.
Once more for the slow; Palin will not even be nominated. If you rely on your news to fill you in on this, you are missing out. She is a crowd pleaser, a warmup act for a main event.


deeps

5,393 posts

242 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Jimbeaux, I know nothing about it, but I have a friend who's convinced that Palin will be next president, which normally I wouldn't take much notice of but he's got a reputation of being usually correct. He correctly predicted Ed Milliband to beat his brother in the Labour leadership battle, even though David was a massive odds on favourite.

Palin is currently trading as 2nd favourite to be the republican nominee, and is third favourite to be next president.

Just curious as to why you feel so sure she won't do it, and in which case who will?

XJSJohn

15,966 posts

220 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
TEKNOPUG said:
Jimbeaux for President.
You would be pleasantly shocked how moderate I would govern. wink
Jimbeaux running for President earlier this week.


XJSJohn

15,966 posts

220 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
davepoth said:
I think the Republican party is going to reap what they have sown at the next election. The Tea Party has taken over the GOP and I don't think the nation sees Palin as presidential. So unless something happens to make Clinton run in the primary, I think he'll make it to two terms.
Once more for the slow; Palin will not even be nominated. If you rely on your news to fill you in on this, you are missing out. She is a crowd pleaser, a warmup act for a main event.
On a more serious note than my previous post hehe ...

Jim, not realy being that clued up on the US political thing, and with time zones being 12 hours arse about face our US political news has usually been heavily dummed down!!

Who are the likely possible runners for Republican and Democrat or is there a good dummies guide link to the runners?

Have to wonder how different things might have been (if at all) if Billary or McCain had won the race to 1600 Pensylvania avenue

catso

14,790 posts

268 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
andy400 said:
Nuge for president!

Wang Dang Sweet Poontang... music

The Black Flash

13,735 posts

199 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Muntu said:
Jimbeaux said:
Bing o said:
He does look somewhat like the first lady, doesn't he?
I sometimes feel sorry for the Chicago Jesus:
Christ, what a mess.

TEKNOPUG

18,971 posts

206 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
TEKNOPUG said:
Jimbeaux for President.
You would be pleasantly shocked how moderate I would govern. wink
Bitterly disappointed more like!

wink

Traveller

4,164 posts

218 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
Traveller said:
Captain Cadillac said:
Of course there's a saying... "It takes a Carter to get a Reagan".
Just what you need, a president who cannot remember his name or whether he has shat himself 5 minutes ago. Perhaps that should read, it takes a Cinton to get a bush jnr..... Shudder.......
So very weak.
It was, I concede. Although, more correctly, it should read, takes a Carter to get a Nancy, the ace ventriloquist.

Either way, deceitful, sociopathic politicians are one of the few constants in the world along side taxes and death, changing the colour of said politician or allegiance is not going to make much of a difference to the final outcome.mad

Long time no see Jim, doing okay ?smile

tinman0

18,231 posts

241 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
TEKNOPUG said:
Jimbeaux said:
TEKNOPUG said:
Jimbeaux for President.
You would be pleasantly shocked how moderate I would govern. wink
Bitterly disappointed more like!

wink
I dunno, MrsJB as First Lady scratchchin

crankedup

25,764 posts

244 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Last time I made a spelling error I was called a f****** c*** is it still OK to rant off in some sort of crazed fury at the OP that has also made a spelling error in his thread title, I wonder?

tinman0

18,231 posts

241 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
crankedup said:
Last time I made a spelling error I was called a f****** c*** is it still OK to rant off in some sort of crazed fury at the OP that has also made a spelling error in his thread title, I wonder?
Considering he was pulled up on that twice on the first page, I do think your outrage on page 4 is probably a bit late. Someone even posted a picture of a hippo!

Anyway, live it up.

(Can I call you a "f****** c***" for a punctuation error? wink )

groan

3,254 posts

180 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
crankedup said:
Last time I made a spelling error I was called a f****** c***. Is it still OK to rant off in some sort of crazed fury at the OP who has also made a spelling error in his thread title, I wonder?
Nonsense. You were bleating about 'falling values', but employing a fallen standard of English in the bleat. Y'know....highlighting the speck in his eye whilst ignoring the beam in your own. Y'know....what's it called... ....hippocrissy.readit

Edited by groan on Friday 21st January 11:50