Climate change - the POLITICAL debate.
Discussion
Nuclear bad. Windymills good!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1734...
"How on Earth can the prime minister justify paying billions of pounds of subsidy to French power companies when the chancellor is slashing welfare budgets for poor people in Britain and there are a million young people unemployed?"
Yeah because renewables don't cost anything do they?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1734...
"How on Earth can the prime minister justify paying billions of pounds of subsidy to French power companies when the chancellor is slashing welfare budgets for poor people in Britain and there are a million young people unemployed?"
Yeah because renewables don't cost anything do they?
Pugster said:
Nuclear bad. Windymills good!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1734...
"How on Earth can the prime minister justify paying billions of pounds of subsidy to French power companies when the chancellor is slashing welfare budgets for poor people in Britain and there are a million young people unemployed?"
Yeah because renewables don't cost anything do they?
I heard that Richard Black used to be a journalist. Apparently now he just writes opinion pieces and dresses them as news.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1734...
"How on Earth can the prime minister justify paying billions of pounds of subsidy to French power companies when the chancellor is slashing welfare budgets for poor people in Britain and there are a million young people unemployed?"
Yeah because renewables don't cost anything do they?
I doubt abyone would be so daft as to not see the greenist agenda though "four former FoE directors"... not experts in anything other than scamming tax payer funds then...
dickymint said:
IainT said:
That's quite telling TB and quite shocking even though we knew that much of our energy bill is scammed off us.
I wonder how much of the OFGEM 'transmission cost' could be reduced by good management..?
Did I read somewhere that these "hidden taxes" break EU law?I wonder how much of the OFGEM 'transmission cost' could be reduced by good management..?
Can't see anything from a quick Google that implies this.
Edited by IainT on Tuesday 13th March 10:42
we should genetically engineer babies to be smaller.
wouldn't it be easier to you know educate certain cultures so they don't kick out sprogs like they are some kind of baby factories. oh no wait that would not target westerners and therefore we can't do that.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-211...
wouldn't it be easier to you know educate certain cultures so they don't kick out sprogs like they are some kind of baby factories. oh no wait that would not target westerners and therefore we can't do that.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-211...
Edited by Pesty on Tuesday 13th March 18:38
http://www.ukip.org/content/latest-news/2627-closu...
Monday 12 March 2012
The closure of a Kent power station been condemned by UKIP's Industry spokesman, Roger Helmer MEP.
Monday 12 March 2012
The closure of a Kent power station been condemned by UKIP's Industry spokesman, Roger Helmer MEP.
Can't we just export all these headcases to their own island and let them run their economy their way, give them Greenland, all the sane nations buy it and we export Europes idiots to live there with all the windy things and such like.
My life would e wonderful, all our lives would be improved.
Where can I vote for that?
My life would e wonderful, all our lives would be improved.
Where can I vote for that?
Gene Vincent said:
Can't we just export all these headcases to their own island and let them run their economy their way, give them Greenland, all the sane nations buy it and we export Europes idiots to live there with all the windy things and such like.
My life would e wonderful, all our lives would be improved.
Where can I vote for that?
A sort of wind powered green socialist utopia? That sounds like Alex Salmonds vision of an independant Scotland so your wish may yet come true. I think you'd also have a better chance of the headcases moving to Scotland then to Greenland and once they are all there we can simply build a line of coal fired power stations this side of Hadrians Wall. These will provide power to Scotland when the wind isn't blowing but at a much higher price thus subsidising cheap electricity for everyone in England.My life would e wonderful, all our lives would be improved.
Where can I vote for that?
Pugster said:
Nuclear bad. Windymills good!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1734...
"How on Earth can the prime minister justify paying billions of pounds of subsidy to French power companies when the chancellor is slashing welfare budgets for poor people in Britain and there are a million young people unemployed?"
Yeah because renewables don't cost anything do they?
So what about the subsidies which go to windfarm owners like E.On (Germany), Dong (Denmark), RWE (Germany) and EdF (France) who then buy turbines from Siemens (Germany) and Vestas (Denmark). http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1734...
"How on Earth can the prime minister justify paying billions of pounds of subsidy to French power companies when the chancellor is slashing welfare budgets for poor people in Britain and there are a million young people unemployed?"
Yeah because renewables don't cost anything do they?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff