Crypto Currency Thread

[Trolleys Thank You]

Caterham.lover said:

Is that similar to how you resort to insults when your usual lies and ignorance are highlighted by those who actually know what they are talking about, before you runaway to make yet another name change, so that you can return to spout the same lies and demonstrate the same lack of understanding at a later date?

That sort of creepy? Or the sort of creepy where you stalk someone on various Finance threads, when you have absolutely nothing to add?

Edited by Caterham.lover on Monday 31st December 14:40

Obligatory "I'm cleverer than you because I've decided I am" statement. 100% Sidicks

[200Plus Club]

100% same tone and style. Same chuffing financial threads for Pete's sake. This begs the question as someone "non stalky" why ? Was he banned as siddicks for continually ruining threads as he did with the incessant arguing?
How many other "I know more than you about financials so I'm better " personas has he had?

[Caterham.lover]

200Plus Club said:

100% same tone and style. Same chuffing financial threads for Pete's sake. This begs the question as someone "non stalky" why ? Was he banned as siddicks for continually ruining threads as he did with the incessant arguing?
How many other "I know more than you about financials so I'm better " personas has he had?

It’s surely not surprising that someone who has worked 25+ years in the industry knows much more about certain aspects of that industry than someone who has never worked in that industry?

I’m certainly not the only one on the thread that has challenged some of the claims being made.

At no point have I claimed that knowing more about a particular subject ‘makes me better’ - you’ve just invented that.

Edited by Caterham.lover on Tuesday 1st January 09:53

[Caterham.lover]

Trolleys Thank You said:

Obligatory "I'm cleverer than you because I've decided I am" statement. 100% Sidicks

I’ve made no such claim.

[Badda]

Caterham.lover said:

Trolleys Thank You said:

Obligatory "I'm cleverer than you because I've decided I am" statement. 100% Sidicks

I’ve made no such claim.

You’ve got an unpleasant manner that is even obvious when you try to hide it. And this is just financial stuff, god only knows what you’re like about important stuff.

[Caterham.lover]

Badda said:

You’ve got an unpleasant manner that is even obvious when you try to hide it. And this is just financial stuff, god only knows what you’re like about important stuff.

For most people, financial stuff is important.

[Badda]

Caterham.lover said:

Badda said:

You’ve got an unpleasant manner that is even obvious when you try to hide it. And this is just financial stuff, god only knows what you’re like about important stuff.

For most people, financial stuff is important.

It’s not important enough to get personal about or try and appear superior about.

[Bluedot]

Anyway......

Can anyone explain Bakkt to me in simple terms ?
I'm reading a lot about it on Twitter and have read their website, most of it means little to me though, lots of words, phrases, solutions but nothing that I understand what it does.

[200Plus Club]

Badda said:

You’ve got an unpleasant manner that is even obvious when you try to hide it. And this is just financial stuff, god only knows what you’re like about important stuff.

Possibly one of the most unpleasant pettily argumentative posters on PH and no disguising it. Hence why bother hiding behind a new name while still doing exactly the same thing is puzzling.
Hey Ho I suppose.

[Lemming Train]

His account must still be restricted as no posts in NPE yet.

[Caterham.lover]

200Plus Club said:

Possibly one of the most unpleasant pettily argumentative posters on PH and no disguising it. Hence why bother hiding behind a new name while still doing exactly the same thing is puzzling.
Hey Ho I suppose.

Pointing out where people are providing misleading advice / statements (in response to members asking for help) is not being 'pettily argumentative'. It also takes two to argue.

[Badda]

You’re also awful at taking criticism. Zero self awareness. ASD maybe?

[Caterham.lover]

Badda said:

You’re also awful at taking criticism. Zero self awareness. ASD maybe?

And yet:

Badda said:

It’s not important enough to get personal about or try and appear superior about.

Is it only 'other people' who are allowed to get personal?

[Badda]

I'm not rising to your belligerence. It's telling that not a single person has come to your defence however.

[Caterham.lover]

Badda said:

I'm not rising to your belligerence. It's telling that not a single person has come to your defence however.

Feel free to ignore your own hypocrisy and your inability to acknowledge the similar actions of actions, purely because they are 'on your side'.

[Badda]

Badda said:

I'm not rising to your belligerence.

[Caterham.lover]

Badda said:

Badda said:

I'm not rising to your belligerence.

Feel free to ignore your own hypocrisy and your inability to acknowledge the similar actions of actions, purely because they are 'on your side'.

[Harris_I]

This thread was reasonably interesting for all but the last page.

[Mousem40]

coyft said:

Why would investors suddenly turn into consumers? Instead of holding a government bond, they would be holding cash. It's no different to the quantitive easing we've had recently, only this time the beneficiaries would be citizens as their Governments would have more money to invest as they aren't paying interest on the debt. In effect it's a government debt reset, which arguably is needed anyway.

Household savings ratio in the UK is currently 1.7%, historically it has been 9.2% of disposable income. People don't tend to save they tend to spend their disposable income. Government debt is built over decades of small bits of savings. People aren't capable, nor would they want to hoard cash under the mattress.

But lets just say they took all that money and stuck it into other savings. £1.78 trillion into stocks and bonds all in one hit. Stock markets go through the roof, everyone feels rich (the wealth effect) and they start to spend money on goods and services and back to high inflation.

If life was as easy as just printing money as and when you wish, then everybody would be doing it. Why bother working at all? Why not just employ printing presses to print cash and make the world a better place?

[wisbech]

coyft said:

The US managed to pump almost $2 trillion into the economy without causing inflation.

Considerable asset inflation though.