Savings interest rate thread
Discussion
Metro dropping their rate:
"We’re getting in touch to let you know that following a review, we’ve decided to decrease the variable Limited Edition rate(s) on the following account(s) on 22nd April 2024:
Online Instant Access Savings, account number ending in XXXX with a current Limited Edition rate of 5.22% AER* will decrease to a new Limited Edition rate of 4.97% AER*."
"We’re getting in touch to let you know that following a review, we’ve decided to decrease the variable Limited Edition rate(s) on the following account(s) on 22nd April 2024:
Online Instant Access Savings, account number ending in XXXX with a current Limited Edition rate of 5.22% AER* will decrease to a new Limited Edition rate of 4.97% AER*."
Funk said:
Metro dropping their rate:
"We’re getting in touch to let you know that following a review, we’ve decided to decrease the variable Limited Edition rate(s) on the following account(s) on 22nd April 2024:
Online Instant Access Savings, account number ending in XXXX with a current Limited Edition rate of 5.22% AER* will decrease to a new Limited Edition rate of 4.97% AER*."
I got the same email. I enjoyed it while it lasted."We’re getting in touch to let you know that following a review, we’ve decided to decrease the variable Limited Edition rate(s) on the following account(s) on 22nd April 2024:
Online Instant Access Savings, account number ending in XXXX with a current Limited Edition rate of 5.22% AER* will decrease to a new Limited Edition rate of 4.97% AER*."
Funk said:
Metro dropping their rate:
Online Instant Access Savings, account number ending in XXXX with a current Limited Edition rate of 5.22% AER* will decrease to a new Limited Edition rate of 4.97% AER*."
Probably just enough to save them a few quid and not enough to prompt savers to leave.Online Instant Access Savings, account number ending in XXXX with a current Limited Edition rate of 5.22% AER* will decrease to a new Limited Edition rate of 4.97% AER*."
981Boxess said:
Probably just enough to save them a few quid and not enough to prompt savers to leave.
I think they’re in a vastly overfunded position based on their inability to implement front book changes until mid January. So this is the response to that I beleive. Expect more to come if their new front book rates are anything to go by. I’ve also heard there’s a potential pivot now to reduce the retail element of their balance sheet and go after SME following the restructure so may also be in evidence. Teatowell said:
981Boxess said:
Probably just enough to save them a few quid and not enough to prompt savers to leave.
I think they’re in a vastly overfunded position based on their inability to implement front book changes until mid January. So this is the response to that I beleive. Expect more to come if their new front book rates are anything to go by. I’ve also heard there’s a potential pivot now to reduce the retail element of their balance sheet and go after SME following the restructure so may also be in evidence. Teatowell said:
981Boxess said:
Probably just enough to save them a few quid and not enough to prompt savers to leave.
I think they’re in a vastly overfunded position based on their inability to implement front book changes until mid January. So this is the response to that I beleive. Expect more to come if their new front book rates are anything to go by. I’ve also heard there’s a potential pivot now to reduce the retail element of their balance sheet and go after SME following the restructure so may also be in evidence. What inability to implement front book changes until January?
Vastly overfunded - I thought they just had to do a massive debt refinancing exercise, given their current rates I don’t they are behaving like they have an excess of deposits?
NRG1976 said:
I don’t understand your response, please can you explain?
What inability to implement front book changes until January?
Vastly overfunded - I thought they just had to do a massive debt refinancing exercise, given their current rates I don’t they are behaving like they have an excess of deposits?
You’re confusing capital with liquidity. Metro held best buy rates across most savings market segments through from December to mid January, I think part due to an inability/difficulty in affecting updated interest rates and reduce pricing on new products more in line with market. To that end in my view I expect they’ll have raised a significant excess of deposits far beyond their liquidity requirement which are not needed. In my view they’re now affecting changes to reduce that liquidity excess position and reduce interest expense. Logically it doesn’t make sense to be absolute top of market and then to move to the other extreme across that time frame, and now be implementing out of cycle rate reductions, of which I expect more to follow. What inability to implement front book changes until January?
Vastly overfunded - I thought they just had to do a massive debt refinancing exercise, given their current rates I don’t they are behaving like they have an excess of deposits?
Capital position and recent difficulty/restructure is something completely seperate.
Edited by Teatowell on Wednesday 21st February 14:39
Edited by Teatowell on Wednesday 21st February 14:39
bmwmike said:
asfault said:
btw for anyone with one or just open one up t212 pays 5.2% interest daily on uninvested cash.
Is tht the best in the market right now an actual stocks and shares account?
Tax free tooIs tht the best in the market right now an actual stocks and shares account?
Or are we assuming the unused cash is sitting inside an ISA wrapper, as opposed to unused trading funds.
Gassing Station | Finance | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff