Single track dead end - emergency vehicles

[Elysium]

Equus said:

I also chose to snip the line that said:

Elysium said:

Although it is a private road, there are still applicable design standards. The complexity is that they require land that belongs to someone else.

...Despite the fact that it compounds the error of your statement and makes it clear that you misunderstand the process.

I reiterate: compliance with design standards, or any other assessment of the Planning merits or otherwise of the work is irrelevant from the point of view of a CLUED. Either the work requires Planning consent, or it doesn't. That is all that a CLUED measures.

Well done. You know more about certificates of lawful use than I do.

However, there was no error or misunderstanding in my statement. I've already told you that my suggestion was tactical because I do not think the planning process is going to provide a permanent solution to the problem the OP has shared.

Ignoring that to try to prove your knowledge is a bit desperate. As I said before, its not that important

[austinsmirk]

A pic of the road might help. You've probably got 100 yrs worth of people opening up driveways onto terraces/cottages on land they've been adopting for decades. All pinching bits of fencing and land. then suddenly landowner says no- I'm fencing to the boundary.

as for emergency appliances- what's on the other side of the houses- any other route of access ?

landowner could possibly even charge for access from his road onto yr properties- but I'm not about to start arguing that on here with you lot !!!!

some years ago I stopped someone developing land as the only way to cross it, was over a road I own. in theory he could build on the plot- but I refused to allow road/vehicle and even tapping into the drain access onto my land. without it, he was stuffed.

[herbialfa]

Give me 5 minutes to sort out my "popcorn" this looks good!