Boiler service - invoice has additional hourly rate?

Boiler service - invoice has additional hourly rate?

Author
Discussion

ST12AT

539 posts

168 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
The additional charge is absolutely fine in my eyes and his explanation as to why is also absolutely fine.

However, claiming it took 1.5 hours when it only took 1 hour is absolutely not fine.

Sticky situation really, he probably won’t care one bit if you decide not to use him again and you’ll probably not care for the additional £30 once you’ve paid it but you’d both feel aggrieved either way. You’re more likely to need him in the future than him needed long you so I wouldn’t just stick your jack. Give him a call and say that his explanation of the additional cost is fine and you’d be more than happy to pay but you want to query how long the engineer was there for.

Oil companies to put additives in but that’s another story, it wouldn’t be at the cost of 30 minutes more servicing time though....

ST12AT

539 posts

168 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
alfabeat said:
Just had our oil boiler serviced and received the invoice this morning...£172 (inc VAT).

Ex VAT prices

Service - 1 hour @ £95
Oil hose - £17 x 2
Nozzle - £15

Didn't bother getting a quote as they come every year, but this is a jump up on previous years and they replaced the oil hoses last year.

How often should oil hoses be replaced?

I think I will be shopping around next year - or switch it to every two years.
Prices look ok to me.

Replacing hoses every year is a money making scam at those prices. £17 would suggest it’s a long life hose which should see 5+ years service life. £3 hoses shouldn’t be used in my opinion but they should be changed annually.



Wacky Racer

38,168 posts

248 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
Daggerpie said:
I don't know how long it takes, in fact, I made him a cup of tea and even have a little chat which annoys me even more!

Any thought gents?
That's where you went wrong.smile

Daggerpie

Original Poster:

1,434 posts

202 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
ST12AT said:
The additional charge is absolutely fine in my eyes and his explanation as to why is also absolutely fine.

However, claiming it took 1.5 hours when it only took 1 hour is absolutely not fine.

Oil companies to put additives in but that’s another story, it wouldn’t be at the cost of 30 minutes more servicing time though....
You're getting confused, he was there for nearly 1.5hrs, just like he was the same time last year and the year before. All 3 years services (same friendly engineer) he has always quoted boiler absolutely fine, no probs, changes nozzle, gives me the old one (which looks brand new anyway) and gives me the test sheet to show it. We always have a little natter, cup of tea etc...all good.

It is only now I have been hit with this additional charge (yes, yes, I know its only £40.00) to apparantly cover this extra time for dirty boilers caused by dodgy additives. I totally understand the explanation of the charge but just cannot get my head around why it is applicable to me, it has taken exactly the same time as previous years and not a mention of a dirty or clogged boiler on service sheet or verbally, in fact, always quite the opposite.

I think I'll offer to pay service cost and have done with it. Goodbye and use someone else for next service.

CharlesElliott

2,010 posts

283 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
Could you not look at it as having the last two years of 1.5 hours work at a discount because they only charged you for 1 hour? What happens if the next company you come across says that it takes two hours to service your boiler?

The accent from her in Ronin

5,245 posts

121 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
There are no additives in heating oil that foul your boiler. Ask him to explain a bit more - he won't.

alfabeat

1,115 posts

113 months

Friday 8th January 2021
quotequote all
ST12AT said:
Prices look ok to me.

Replacing hoses every year is a money making scam at those prices. £17 would suggest it’s a long life hose which should see 5+ years service life. £3 hoses shouldn’t be used in my opinion but they should be changed annually.
As I expected. Thanks.

g7jtk

1,756 posts

155 months

Saturday 9th January 2021
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
Or send them a tea bill.
Did the engineer ask for the tea?

littlebasher

3,781 posts

172 months

Saturday 9th January 2021
quotequote all
Daggerpie said:
Goodbye and use someone else for next service.
Indeed, trust is lost now either way.

Better to find someone else, it's their loss not yours.


One of our cars was serviced last summer at a local garage I've always used. The bill was way more than I expected, as they claimed the filters were difficult to source and expensive.
I looked them up and those parts are some of the most readily available as well as being inexpensive. All he's done now is lost a customer for the sake of trying to make a quick buck, not an effective long term business strategy.

hotchy

4,473 posts

127 months

Saturday 9th January 2021
quotequote all
g7jtk said:
PositronicRay said:
Or send them a tea bill.
Did the engineer ask for the tea?
I never asked for a large big mac meal, however I was offered. I said yes, like the engineer said yes. Why should I be charged and not him wink

Chrisgr31

13,484 posts

256 months

Saturday 9th January 2021
quotequote all
Why would oil companies add additives to the oil that make it dirtier? And more to point how come the OP has special oil that it is dirtier than everyone else’s and therefore makes his service take longer?

If the service has taken 1.5 hours every time then either the engineer is slow (& potential methodical) compared to other engineers, or the OP has a boiler that’s more difficult to service than others.

To suggest the oil that the OP is using causes the service to take longer has to be wrong, unless the OP has a strange source of oil.

Chipstick

318 posts

41 months

Saturday 9th January 2021
quotequote all
The thing that stands out for me is the fact that’s it’s historically been a ~1h30 visit but you’ve always paid an hour, and presumably you’ve always been aware you’ve paid for less time than received and kept it quiet as a ‘win’ but don’t like it when the shoe is on the other foot.

They’ve now cottoned on to charging for an hour when it’s takes between and hour and 1h30. They don’t charge pro rata for the 1h15 it may have taken without small talk or tea.

If you use another company next year, will they charge you for the 1 hour at a similar rate? Or will they probably charge you more to the point you’d wish you’d stayed with the same company?

Have you had quotes from others?

You sound like a man of principle so will only be happy if you get off the 30 mins charge and go your separate ways, but just consider what you’ll pay next year and which is the best option in the long run.

Got shanked in prison.

5,245 posts

121 months

Saturday 9th January 2021
quotequote all
Chrisgr31 said:
Why would oil companies add additives to the oil that make it dirtier? And more to point how come the OP has special oil that it is dirtier than everyone else’s and therefore makes his service take longer?
They don't, that is a blatant lie. Which is why I would tell them to fcensoredck themselves, not pay the bill at all, and use someone else in future. If they said that his boiler had been building up soot over the years and had no got to the stage where it needed more time due to the cleaning required that would be more acceptable, but possibly still wrong and very possibly still a lie as he's been told how clean the boiler runs. The company are being dishonest to make more cash and trying to cover for it.
Send them a bill for the chat time, charged at a good high hourly rate. laugh