Dog walking boots/shoes

Author
Discussion

ATG

20,625 posts

273 months

Wednesday 8th November 2017
quotequote all
If you're really walking 1 to 2 hours every day, and they're regularly getting wet on the outside and humid inside, then that's actually quite a lot of punishment for a leather boot and the upper won't last forever. There are any number of manufacturers making very similar products across the entire range of "approach shoes", wellies, fabric sort-of walking boots, 3/4 season walking boots, to fully rigid mountaineering kit. One clear piece of advice; only a moron spends £100 on a pair of Hunter wellies. Beyond that though, the market is pretty competitive, so, for exampke, the difference btwn Zamberlan, Meindl, Berghaus, Brasher, Scarpa is damn all for a pair of hill boots. I'd just go to a good shop that had a wide range and try a load on.

P.s. on the boot versus shoe thing, if I'm jogging across rough ground, I'm fine in a pair of running shoes. If I walk across the same terrain in the same shoes I'll be at risk of turning an ankle and I'd wear a boot instead. Running and walking are not the same thing.

PositronicRay

Original Poster:

27,051 posts

184 months

Wednesday 8th November 2017
quotequote all
ATG said:
If you're really walking 1 to 2 hours every day, and they're regularly getting wet on the outside and humid inside, then that's actually quite a lot of punishment for a leather boot and the upper won't last forever. There are any number of manufacturers making very similar products across the entire range of "approach shoes", wellies, fabric sort-of walking boots, 3/4 season walking boots, to fully rigid mountaineering kit. One clear piece of advice; only a moron spends £100 on a pair of Hunter wellies. Beyond that though, the market is pretty competitive, so, for exampke, the difference btwn Zamberlan, Meindl, Berghaus, Brasher, Scarpa is damn all for a pair of hill boots. I'd just go to a good shop that had a wide range and try a load on.

P.s. on the boot versus shoe thing, if I'm jogging across rough ground, I'm fine in a pair of running shoes. If I walk across the same terrain in the same shoes I'll be at risk of turning an ankle and I'd wear a boot instead. Running and walking are not the same thing.



Winter, wet weather use, agricultural and grass, although not well trodden paths, often across ploughed fields where paths haven't been reinstated.

A pair lasts around 2 yrs, the last ones split around the toecap. As you say the leather just rots, even though treated with a propriety cream. I've a pair or trainer style Merrill shoes for the summer, Dunlop wellies for really soggy weather.

popeyewhite

19,977 posts

121 months

Wednesday 8th November 2017
quotequote all
ATG said:
P.s. on the boot versus shoe thing, if I'm jogging across rough ground, I'm fine in a pair of running shoes. If I walk across the same terrain in the same shoes I'll be at risk of turning an ankle and I'd wear a boot instead. Running and walking are not the same thing.
They're not - but I'm afraid you are completely wrong - the dangers of ankle injury when running are greater due to speed and impact forces. You're far more likely to suffer serious ankle injury running as there is 4 to 8 times more impact/weight travelling through your joints at each footfall. Physics tells us you're more likely to slip/slide in any condition the faster you go. During a slip whilst running the forces pushing your ankle over can be up to (8X) bodyweight X speed than walking. I can't see how at any kind of walk you're more likely to turn an ankle than when running. Perhaps you take a snifter or two with you? smile

g3rrd

682 posts

189 months

Wednesday 8th November 2017
quotequote all
Millets sale. Meindl Bhutan MFS boots for £140 then -15% online discount, £119. Bargain. yes

Returned mine as found the fit too narrow. frown

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Wednesday 8th November 2017
quotequote all
g3rrd said:
Millets sale. Meindl Bhutan MFS boots for £140 then -15% online discount, £119. Bargain. yes

Returned mine as found the fit too narrow. frown
I have two pairs of meindl one is a wide fitting comfort. Very comfy built like tanks though the only thing is they are heavy.
Very thick leather compared to other brands.

CAPP0

19,608 posts

204 months

Wednesday 8th November 2017
quotequote all
g3rrd said:
Millets sale. Meindl Bhutan MFS boots for £140 then -15% online discount, £119. Bargain. yes

Returned mine as found the fit too narrow. frown
Where did you find the 15% discount??

Konan

1,842 posts

147 months

Wednesday 8th November 2017
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
My Brashers have given up the ghost @ only 2 yrs old so what to replace them with?
I had a set die after 13 months. Set of Brashers I had before did 10 YEARS with the same use!

Berghaus (who purchased Brasher) had no interest whatsoever.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Wednesday 8th November 2017
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
g3rrd said:
Millets sale. Meindl Bhutan MFS boots for £140 then -15% online discount, £119. Bargain. yes

Returned mine as found the fit too narrow. frown
Where did you find the 15% discount??
Worth mentioning that go outdoors meet prices if in stock.


g3rrd

682 posts

189 months

Thursday 9th November 2017
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
Where did you find the 15% discount??
Sorry for the late reply. Code "Frost15", also free p&p. Just onscreen prompt when put into my "basket"?.

CAPP0

19,608 posts

204 months

Thursday 9th November 2017
quotequote all
g3rrd said:
CAPP0 said:
Where did you find the 15% discount??
Sorry for the late reply. Code "Frost15", also free p&p. Just onscreen prompt when put into my "basket"?.
Thanks for the reply. Sadly they don't stock my size! Might see what else they have though.

Steve_W

1,496 posts

178 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
Interesting stuff all this support/don't support the ankle.

For a year or more I've had pain in my right ankle ligament, now I'm noticing a similar pain starting in the left ligament. I've always assumed it was the use of wellies when walking the dogs twice a day so presumed I ought to wear something with more support.

Like others, I've tried normal walking boots, but tend to walk in areas where there's lots of long grass etc so want something to keep my feet & trousers dry - hence the wellies. Guess I may have to get some gaiters if I'm to use a walking shoe/boot.

ATG

20,625 posts

273 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2017
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
ATG said:
P.s. on the boot versus shoe thing, if I'm jogging across rough ground, I'm fine in a pair of running shoes. If I walk across the same terrain in the same shoes I'll be at risk of turning an ankle and I'd wear a boot instead. Running and walking are not the same thing.
They're not - but I'm afraid you are completely wrong - the dangers of ankle injury when running are greater due to speed and impact forces. You're far more likely to suffer serious ankle injury running as there is 4 to 8 times more impact/weight travelling through your joints at each footfall. Physics tells us you're more likely to slip/slide in any condition the faster you go. During a slip whilst running the forces pushing your ankle over can be up to (8X) bodyweight X speed than walking. I can't see how at any kind of walk you're more likely to turn an ankle than when running. Perhaps you take a snifter or two with you? smile
The snifter thing isn't a million miles off the mark, the point being that the rather obvious physics isn't the issue. When I run off road I'm far more conscious of where I'm putting my feet than when I'm walking, I'm ready to let myself roll if my footing goes rather than fight to stay upright, muscles are tensed to hold the foot in position rather than relaxed to just let it settle onto the ground, and I'm also not running very quickly. If I was going at any speed of course it'd be riskier than walking both in terms of the likelihood and seriousness of the injury.

popeyewhite

19,977 posts

121 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2017
quotequote all
ATG said:
The snifter thing isn't a million miles off the mark, the point being that the rather obvious physics isn't the issue. When I run off road I'm far more conscious of where I'm putting my feet than when I'm walking, I'm ready to let myself roll if my footing goes rather than fight to stay upright, muscles are tensed to hold the foot in position rather than relaxed to just let it settle onto the ground, and I'm also not running very quickly. If I was going at any speed of course it'd be riskier than walking both in terms of the likelihood and seriousness of the injury.
Actually the fact you're going faster just forces you to concentrate a bit more on what you're doing, but really most of us pay attention where we walk as well. Perhaps if you switch off you should pair your high boots with a crash helmet as well? smile Anyway, speed increase raises the impact force exponentially, so even if, as you say, you're "not running very quickly", any impact will still be worse. If you could explain how your "muscles are tensed to hold the foot in position", while at the same time you're "ready to let myself roll if my footing goes" I'd be quite interested - surely you'd be better with muscles relaxed - that's the way I run trails.. .. Incidentally physics are very much an issue as running speed (momentum) makes you're body want to go one way, and only the tiny patch of the front of your foot in contact with the ground has any say over change of direction, acceleration and slowing down, and the faster you go... .

ATG

20,625 posts

273 months

Thursday 23rd November 2017
quotequote all
Popeye ... give it a rest. If you're going to try to talk Physics, don't use words like "exponentially" loosely. They have precise meaning. How is it hard to understand or indeed interesting that one can (a) have your muscles tensed so that your controlling the position of your foot (like when you're edging across a slope) and yet also being (b) ready to let yourself fall if you feel your footing go? Making passive-aggressive "jokes" and sticking a smiley at the end is a bit transparent.

Blackpuddin

16,591 posts

206 months

Thursday 23rd November 2017
quotequote all
Never you mind said:
Wife has some Meindl boots. Had them for a few years with zero problems. Meant to be really comfortable as well.
Another vote here for Meindl. Mine are at least 25 years old but apart from light wear on the heels they're as good as new and a perfect fit.

Blackpuddin

16,591 posts

206 months

Thursday 23rd November 2017
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
I had some Altberg bike boots some 15 years ago. Very good boot, hideously expensive, overkill for my biking needs.
I assumed they must be expensive as they don't have the nerve to put prices on their website. That's not going to help them get customers.

redddraggon

268 posts

130 months

Thursday 23rd November 2017
quotequote all
I generally get a pair of military surplus boots for dog walking etc.

I have a pair of brown desert meindls (£25 on ebay) for the summer, and brown Karrimor SF gore tex (£50 ebay) boots for winter/rain. Dead cheap, good quality, not too worried about damage or loss etc.

A year ago I bought a pair of Hanwag Tatras for about £135, absolutely wonderful boots, only lasted me 4 months though until I left one behind somewhere frown I still keep the odd one just incase I ever find the other rofl

popeyewhite

19,977 posts

121 months

Thursday 23rd November 2017
quotequote all
ATG said:
Popeye ... give it a rest. If you're going to try to talk Physics, don't use words like "exponentially" loosely. They have precise meaning. How is it hard to understand or indeed interesting that one can (a) have your muscles tensed so that your controlling the position of your foot (like when you're edging across a slope) and yet also being (b) ready to let yourself fall if you feel your footing go? Making passive-aggressive "jokes" and sticking a smiley at the end is a bit transparent.
No problems with any of that. I've tried using layman's language to explain it to you but you just get the hump. My smiley doesn't signify anything passive-aggressive: you're a stranger on an internet forum, why would I waste any emotion on you? I was taking the piss, that's all wink Have a wink and chill out.

popeyewhite

19,977 posts

121 months

Thursday 23rd November 2017
quotequote all
Blackpuddin said:
popeyewhite said:
I had some Altberg bike boots some 15 years ago. Very good boot, hideously expensive, overkill for my biking needs.
I assumed they must be expensive as they don't have the nerve to put prices on their website. That's not going to help them get customers.
Well they were high biking boots and were in excess of £280 IIRC. I actually purchased a lighter, shorter pair for summer for £50 from the local bike shop that have lasted just as well. Altberg pop up every now and again on Ebay... .

PositronicRay

Original Poster:

27,051 posts

184 months

Thursday 23rd November 2017
quotequote all
Blackpuddin said:
Never you mind said:
Wife has some Meindl boots. Had them for a few years with zero problems. Meant to be really comfortable as well.
Another vote here for Meindl. Mine are at least 25 years old but apart from light wear on the heels they're as good as new and a perfect fit.
I find the 25yr thing a bit of a stretch, even my wife's boots, (she's very light on footwear, always cleaned and only worn 15-20 times PA for 5 miles a pop) don't last that long.