Walking dogs off lead, why?
Discussion
Mr Spoon said:
Still not worked it out have you chaps?
Your blindness support for letting dogs off leads appear to be clouding your judgement and ability to read.
The point I'm making is letting your dogs off lead is risky. Risky for you and for others.
Ps I'm off to beat my three with pictures of people and dogs I don't like just to be sure they lunge at them when accidentally coming across them. Whilst foaming at the mouth and eyes.
No it's not. Might be for you and yours but as I've said before many many years of owning lots of dogs and never once had an issue. Your blindness support for letting dogs off leads appear to be clouding your judgement and ability to read.
The point I'm making is letting your dogs off lead is risky. Risky for you and for others.
Ps I'm off to beat my three with pictures of people and dogs I don't like just to be sure they lunge at them when accidentally coming across them. Whilst foaming at the mouth and eyes.
Muppet007 said:
Mr Spoon said:
Still not worked it out have you chaps?
Your blindness support for letting dogs off leads appear to be clouding your judgement and ability to read.
The point I'm making is letting your dogs off lead is risky. Risky for you and for others.
Ps I'm off to beat my three with pictures of people and dogs I don't like just to be sure they lunge at them when accidentally coming across them. Whilst foaming at the mouth and eyes.
No it's not. Might be for you and yours but as I've said before many many years of owning lots of dogs and never once had an issue. Your blindness support for letting dogs off leads appear to be clouding your judgement and ability to read.
The point I'm making is letting your dogs off lead is risky. Risky for you and for others.
Ps I'm off to beat my three with pictures of people and dogs I don't like just to be sure they lunge at them when accidentally coming across them. Whilst foaming at the mouth and eyes.
The Vet will back me up here.(hopefully) Mrs Spoon is a vet. You approach all dogs with the same respect and caution every time.
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
blade7 said:
Antony Moxey said:
We’ll don’t go out then
I will say it again everybody should have freedom/right to go about their business without being chased or approached uninvited. You can have a dog its your choice to control it properly rights are more important than choices.
Seventy said:
Mr Spoon said:
The point I'm making is letting your dogs off lead is risky. Risky for you and for others.
Actually, I think the point you’ve (more than adequately) made is that your dogs are dangerous and letting them off the lead would be catastrophic. You're right about one thing, letting any husky off a lead would result in a disaster. Every husky orientated organisation in the world will happily promote that.
Nothing aggressive about any of my three rescue huskies.
They only get excited when your off lead stupid mutt gets frightened and usually aggressive with them. That's when your dog realises it ain't so big and clever, so consequently, keep it on a lead and away from me and anyone else.
Problem solved.
Ps I love you.
Edit for bold formatting error
Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 20th June 22:33
stuartmmcfc said:
bmwmike said:
blade7 said:
No worries. Walking 3 Huskies is a problem waiting to happen IMO.
whys that?Brave man!
Spooney, your ego is massive.
Eons ago I let my ego manifest itself in a dog that attacked everything that needed sorting. He had no equal back then. Now I have a dog called sausage :-) and I don't need to 'big up myself' on here or the local park. I'm a contented chap ;-) My ego is well under control and I'm not following 3 hairy bottoms on my daily walks.
Eons ago I let my ego manifest itself in a dog that attacked everything that needed sorting. He had no equal back then. Now I have a dog called sausage :-) and I don't need to 'big up myself' on here or the local park. I'm a contented chap ;-) My ego is well under control and I'm not following 3 hairy bottoms on my daily walks.
Edited by Boosted LS1 on Monday 20th June 23:13
Boosted LS1 said:
Spooney, your ego is massive.
Eons ago I let my ego manifest itself in a dog that attacked everything that needed sorting. He had no equal back then. Now I have a dog called sausage :-) and I don't need to 'big up myself' on here or the local park. I'm a contented chap ;-) My ego is well under control and I'm not following 3 hairy bottoms on my daily walks.
I don't have an ego. I have knives, forks and occasionally teaspoons. Eons ago I let my ego manifest itself in a dog that attacked everything that needed sorting. He had no equal back then. Now I have a dog called sausage :-) and I don't need to 'big up myself' on here or the local park. I'm a contented chap ;-) My ego is well under control and I'm not following 3 hairy bottoms on my daily walks.
Edited by Boosted LS1 on Monday 20th June 23:13
Mr Spoon said:
You seem to misunderstand here. As does the others who have made an assumption that huskies and my huskies are aggressive.
What you fail to see (read) because you don't want to is when your off lead dog runs up to my three nothing much happens untill your off lead dogs gets frightened, then lashes out, then gets its arse handed to it. Yes I've used that sentence again
So keep your mutts on your leads and guess what, no dog gets injured.
But alas, they are clearly aggressive dangerous dogs.
Only an idiot will let their dog near a group of 35kg animals that clearly have the means to defend themselves.
You wouldn't let your dog run near three unknown alsatians, rottweilers, grate Danes or anything similar and I would expect anyone with an ounce of sense to understand your off lead dog poses a threat to any on lead dog.
I'm merely making explaining it in simplistic terms, let your loose dog near my three and if your loose dog threatens them, then expect a suitable reaction.
So consequently put your bloody dogs on leads.
+1 for the rights to arms crowd. You can't educate pork.
You seem to have a reading problem.What you fail to see (read) because you don't want to is when your off lead dog runs up to my three nothing much happens untill your off lead dogs gets frightened, then lashes out, then gets its arse handed to it. Yes I've used that sentence again
So keep your mutts on your leads and guess what, no dog gets injured.
But alas, they are clearly aggressive dangerous dogs.
Only an idiot will let their dog near a group of 35kg animals that clearly have the means to defend themselves.
You wouldn't let your dog run near three unknown alsatians, rottweilers, grate Danes or anything similar and I would expect anyone with an ounce of sense to understand your off lead dog poses a threat to any on lead dog.
I'm merely making explaining it in simplistic terms, let your loose dog near my three and if your loose dog threatens them, then expect a suitable reaction.
So consequently put your bloody dogs on leads.
+1 for the rights to arms crowd. You can't educate pork.
Thevet said:
Gorgeous 😎The problem with Rottweilers is when they run their cheeks and jowls flop about, which shows the Rottweiler grin which to be honest can look quite scary. It’s also when they can look happiest.
Whatever the dog, aslong as the owner is able to read the situation around them and make sensible decisions, then mostly everything will be fine and no-one will feel nervous or scared or in any way troubled.
My 2 are off the lead a lot now but they are always kept close till I can be sure they are not in a silly mood. If they are it’s back on the lead.
Dave!
Antony Moxey said:
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
blade7 said:
Antony Moxey said:
We’ll don’t go out then
I will say it again everybody should have freedom/right to go about their business without being chased or approached uninvited. You can have a dog its your choice to control it properly rights are more important than choices.
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
Greenbot35 said:
Antony Moxey said:
blade7 said:
Antony Moxey said:
We’ll don’t go out then
I will say it again everybody should have freedom/right to go about their business without being chased or approached uninvited. You can have a dog its your choice to control it properly rights are more important than choices.
Howitzer said:
Gorgeous ??
The problem with Rottweilers is when they run their cheeks and jowls flop about, which shows the Rottweiler grin which to be honest can look quite scary. It’s also when they can look happiest.
Whatever the dog, aslong as the owner is able to read the situation around them and make sensible decisions, then mostly everything will be fine and no-one will feel nervous or scared or in any way troubled.
My 2 are off the lead a lot now but they are always kept close till I can be sure they are not in a silly mood. If they are it’s back on the lead.
Dave!
Well the rest of the thread is heading to steness so here are some rottie cheeksThe problem with Rottweilers is when they run their cheeks and jowls flop about, which shows the Rottweiler grin which to be honest can look quite scary. It’s also when they can look happiest.
Whatever the dog, aslong as the owner is able to read the situation around them and make sensible decisions, then mostly everything will be fine and no-one will feel nervous or scared or in any way troubled.
My 2 are off the lead a lot now but they are always kept close till I can be sure they are not in a silly mood. If they are it’s back on the lead.
Dave!
[url]|https://thumbsnap.com/XRdUUEZp[/url
]
two of the most important pics of my life of the most important dog I've ever had, miss him so much, Scooby has much to live up to, but he does a better job than some of the posters on here. THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE A FORUM FOR ANIMAL LOVERS, HONESTLY THE TALK IS APPALLING
Gassing Station | All Creatures Great & Small | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff