Why do people say "off" referring to quantity?
Discussion
Similar to the manufacturing thing above, I'd heard it was also to do with sawing wood...possibly from Nelson's time. A piece of timber would be placed on the sawpit and the shipwrights be told to take 3 pieces measuring 2 feet OFF the piece of timber. The instruction would be "wooden posts, 2 foot in length, 3 off"
However, although you've specified your "wooden posts, 3 off", if someone then asks you how many wooden posts you now have, you have 3 "of" them. "Off" is more of a once only instruction, not a collective noun. You can't have 3 off them.
However, although you've specified your "wooden posts, 3 off", if someone then asks you how many wooden posts you now have, you have 3 "of" them. "Off" is more of a once only instruction, not a collective noun. You can't have 3 off them.
crofty1984 said:
sebdangerfield said:
WTF were you searching for to pick up, and comment on a thread as boring as this that’s not been commented on for 9 years!?
"Video material featuring two young (but not too young) ladies and a candle, suitable for a chap to tug one off to"Maybe. :-p
Jasey_ said:
I quite like this explanation ;
"The correct reason for this, is so the Engineer can be sure no information is missing from the quantity instruction. If it read ‘1 of’ it could be missing ‘1 of 3’ so missing the number 3. Hence producing the wrong amount. Having the word of with an extra ‘f’ clearly shows it’s say ...24 off
Not 24 of and a missing number example ‘ 24 of 50.
I hope this make it clear."
From here;
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/385024...
My old dad was an engineer. "The correct reason for this, is so the Engineer can be sure no information is missing from the quantity instruction. If it read ‘1 of’ it could be missing ‘1 of 3’ so missing the number 3. Hence producing the wrong amount. Having the word of with an extra ‘f’ clearly shows it’s say ...24 off
Not 24 of and a missing number example ‘ 24 of 50.
I hope this make it clear."
From here;
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/385024...
This is exactly the explanation he gave me.
I'm a motosport design engineer and I've only ever seen/known "off" when talking about quantities of machined, turned, laser or water jet cut components.
I always assumed it meant we need (X quantity) off the machine. Its never bothered me.
However the provided description makes perfect sense.
I always assumed it meant we need (X quantity) off the machine. Its never bothered me.
However the provided description makes perfect sense.
Glade said:
I work in Manufacturing and when ordering components, subcontract fabrications etc we always order "3 off" when we want 3 parts.
It has always been this way in every company that I've worked in, but it just occurred to me I don't understand why.
Over to the grammar police
It's off. Because it's 3 off the machine. 3 off the supplier. 3 off the shelf.It has always been this way in every company that I've worked in, but it just occurred to me I don't understand why.
Over to the grammar police
Day one of a Manufacturing Engineering HND in 1985 at Coventry Polytechnic.
Learnt the definition of Just In Time. And Lean, before lean was used. And the reason it was Off not of.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff