One for the spelling police
Discussion
optimate said:
well one mate took and hes living good another dident and hes living in a bed sit with f
k all while shes in a 5 bed hes paying for ans screwing some chav
thing is as a man in a divorce your had it no such thing as fair if you want fair you need to do it out side the law
k all while shes in a 5 bed hes paying for ans screwing some chavthing is as a man in a divorce your had it no such thing as fair if you want fair you need to do it out side the law
optimate said:
im not happy for em to all be armed you appear to be level levelheaded without the need to test the new toy for no reason .but iv met a few cops i would not trust with a pea shooter let alone a loaded glock 17. and im shaw if you tell the truth there be a few on you shift you would want to hand a loaded gun too. Out of curiosity when you carry do they allow you to carry em chambered or un chambered ?
Found this one on another forum 
And from PH:
person talking about a Jaguar said:
Why would you want to stick an old leper on your bonnet?
This was in relation to someone deciding to stick a classic look Jaguar "leaper" onto the bonnet of their 2 year old XF And from PH:
optimate said:
Are you lot so board these days since kicked every one out that don't agree with your views that you have to troll yourself`s lol
optimate said:
not your problem there contract was with the dealer they brought it off
Edit - Thinking about it. Looking back on the, short, posting history suggests this could easily be a troll account with deliberately crap spelling.optimate said:
exactly, only some wont pass id say quite a few more than that lol
the main cost is the training not the fire arm and 9mm rounds are cheap
trining some with no intrest or zero experience in fire arms and to use em them in combat on urban settings is very expensive and a pity bad idea
armed uniformed police in uk are mostly for show bar armed response
in a emergence and back up if there a op on
the main cost is the training not the fire arm and 9mm rounds are cheap
trining some with no intrest or zero experience in fire arms and to use em them in combat on urban settings is very expensive and a pity bad idea
armed uniformed police in uk are mostly for show bar armed response
in a emergence and back up if there a op on
Edited by Osinjak on Thursday 1st June 20:48
From someone who supposedly has a legal background..then gets all upset when someone corrects them.
Breadvan72 said:
All you need to start a grievance is the following -
Dear [ ]
I would like to raise a grievance about the handling of an overpaymant of my salary.
The facts are these: From xxxx to yyyy the company erroneously paid me £NNN per month too much. I was not aware of this error until zzzz. The company has asked for the overpayment to be refunded by me, but has not engaged in reasonable discussions about repayment, and especially about the time for repayment. I have attempted on several occasions to discuss the matter, but the company has not engaged in discussion. I attach the relevant emails to this letter.
My most recent salary payment has had an amount equal to one quarter of the amount claimed by the company. This has place me in financial difficulty. It is not fair that I should have to suffer this difficulty because of the company's mistake. I have been legally advised that the company is not acting in a manner that is fair, reasonable and consistent with its obligation to maintain trust and confidence.
I therefore wish to invoke the grievance procedure. I am looking for, at the very least, a reasonable payment schedule. But before that can be agreed, the whole issue of the amount of repayment should please be discussed. This letter has been written with the benefit of legal advice. I reserve all of my rights. I await hearing from you as soon as possible.
Yours sincerely
Dear [ ]
I would like to raise a grievance about the handling of an overpaymant of my salary.
The facts are these: From xxxx to yyyy the company erroneously paid me £NNN per month too much. I was not aware of this error until zzzz. The company has asked for the overpayment to be refunded by me, but has not engaged in reasonable discussions about repayment, and especially about the time for repayment. I have attempted on several occasions to discuss the matter, but the company has not engaged in discussion. I attach the relevant emails to this letter.
My most recent salary payment has had an amount equal to one quarter of the amount claimed by the company. This has place me in financial difficulty. It is not fair that I should have to suffer this difficulty because of the company's mistake. I have been legally advised that the company is not acting in a manner that is fair, reasonable and consistent with its obligation to maintain trust and confidence.
I therefore wish to invoke the grievance procedure. I am looking for, at the very least, a reasonable payment schedule. But before that can be agreed, the whole issue of the amount of repayment should please be discussed. This letter has been written with the benefit of legal advice. I reserve all of my rights. I await hearing from you as soon as possible.
Yours sincerely
Breadvan72 said:
EDIT - typos corrected to keep some snarky tosser happy.
The gift that keeps on giving.J4CKO said:
Its up to the individual if they want to follow a faith, just dont expect everyone to like it or want to pander to it.
To me, its some good moral rules, mixed in with heaps and heaps of nonsense that seemed like a good idea 2000 plus years ago, every other book gets revised and improved over time, but not religious ones.
I cant get my head around ll the different ones, if there was just one I would be a bit more impressed but they are all different, mainly as they were all invented by humans, largely to control other humans, with particular fixations about sex, pork and alcohol, I cannot countenance any restrictions on those items as it would really ruin my weekends.
They all seem to rely mainly on folk being born into them and indoctrinated from an early age and you cant really leave or decide its not for you as you get ostracised, so its easier to tow the line, go through the motions and not stick your neck out, like a big Ponzi scheme really though Christianity seems to have broken it a bit.
I think the human ace could have developed quicker without it, its like group OCD in my eyes but if it works for you, knock yourself out
To me, its some good moral rules, mixed in with heaps and heaps of nonsense that seemed like a good idea 2000 plus years ago, every other book gets revised and improved over time, but not religious ones.
I cant get my head around ll the different ones, if there was just one I would be a bit more impressed but they are all different, mainly as they were all invented by humans, largely to control other humans, with particular fixations about sex, pork and alcohol, I cannot countenance any restrictions on those items as it would really ruin my weekends.
They all seem to rely mainly on folk being born into them and indoctrinated from an early age and you cant really leave or decide its not for you as you get ostracised, so its easier to tow the line, go through the motions and not stick your neck out, like a big Ponzi scheme really though Christianity seems to have broken it a bit.
I think the human ace could have developed quicker without it, its like group OCD in my eyes but if it works for you, knock yourself out
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff