Show us your new shoes
Discussion
FreeLitres said:
Out of interest, is there a noticeable difference in quality between the Loakes and C&J wth regards to sole, leather, stitching, etc?
I'm no leather or shoe expert but there is a discernible difference between the two with the C&Js being of a higher quality as you'd expect for double the price. The leather upper on the C&Js feels more supple and of a higher quality leather in comparison with the Loakes and the boots are double leather soled with storm welt - very comfortable from more or less the first wear. Whereas the Loakes were a little stiff when first breaking in. I also think C&J have nailed (not literally!) their last shapes making the boots look really smart whilst not looking overly heavy like some. The Loakes are great shoes for the money though, particularly from their UK-made 1880 range and while there is a difference in quality it would be a personal decision whether C&J, Church's, Trickers et al are worth double the outlay. I wear the Loakes more actually as they look great dressed up with chinos or down with jeans and don't worry about them so much in the rain!
Edited by T1547 on Monday 3rd November 08:45
MikeGTi said:
My favourite shoes! Are those brown or tan?
I'm trying to decide at the moment whether to get some Wolfs or Bedales.
Great taste Mine are the brown ones.I'm trying to decide at the moment whether to get some Wolfs or Bedales.
I tried the Bedales but found them a bit large on the foot (they're a G fit). The Wolf are F fit I think, same as the Chesters.
bga said:
Lots of £'s but pretty hardy if you look after them. Replacing the soles is a bit of a lottery, the only place I've been totally happy with are fifthavenueshoerepairs.com/
I've got two pairs of the RM Williams boots, and wear them every day. Wonderful footwear, I've had them two or three years now and would recommend them to anyone.Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff