The term "Mong"

Author
Discussion

irocfan

40,592 posts

191 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Gaspode said:
As for the use of the term "Mong" - yes, of course it's highly offensive, like "Flid". Ignorance of origin is no excuse.
actually I'd disagree here - I'd say it's every excuse. If you continue to use it once you know why it's offensive to people that's a different story

Gaspode

4,167 posts

197 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
irocfan said:
actually I'd disagree here - I'd say it's every excuse. If you continue to use it once you know why it's offensive to people that's a different story
You are of course quite right. Why I hit the send key before I typed "for continuing to use it" is beyond me. Maybe I'm some sort of (insert highly offensive epithet of your choice here). I blame the iPad.

Mr Trophy

6,808 posts

204 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
I honestly never knew the term "Mong" was someone who had DS.


Snowboy

8,028 posts

152 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Berk is the name of a loveable character from Trapdoor.
Trapddor backwards is rood park.

Berk is rhyming slang for a rude part.


(Allegedly. )

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

234 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
wildcat45 said:
So, because there is rarely bad intent behind the term, can I take it that in general Mong is no longer offensive? Just a modern use of an archaic term?
I personally would say that, as I would about a number of other words, yet I think in this happy clappy day and age were all a men walking a child around town are viewed as a likely paedophile unless he is with a female, it is as inadvisable to call someone a mong as it would be to call someone a "N-word" in public.

On the other hand if you are in a closed group and it is general normal conversation you might be more comfortable with it.

Rude-boy, aka for most of 1994/5 as "The (take the N-word and substitute the N for a W)" by his predominately black friends.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
wildcat45 said:
I grew up in the 1980s where we laughed at and imitated Joey Decon. Where the terms Spastic, Spacca, Mong and a host of other words were socially acceptable.
No comment......

By the way, I think the correct PC term is Scopers......

Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 17th July 14:06

onyx39

11,128 posts

151 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Joey Deacon said:
wildcat45 said:
I grew up in the 1980s where we laughed at and imitated Joey Decon. Where the terms Spastic, Spacca, Mong and a host of other words were socially acceptable.
No comment......

By the way, I think the correct PC term is Scopers......

Edited by Joey Deacon on Thursday 17th July 14:06
This is the thread you waited your whole life for Isn't it?


BHC

17,540 posts

180 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
I agree that most younger people would assume that 'Joey' just means 'a bit daft' and comes from Joey from Friends.

Blue Peter did well with that one. They tried to educate children as to the problems of disability, and by mistake made Joey Deacon an object of ridicule.

But OP, this is no different to other words. Imbecile, moon, idiot, spastic etc were all words used by the medical profession and then adopted as insults. When I was a kid 'spaz' was the standard insult, but I rarely hear it now.
I wonder if terms like 'special' will go the same way as people use them with more and more venom.

QuantumTokoloshi

4,166 posts

218 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Would an alternative descriptive for Mong be Window Licker perhaps ?

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

199 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
it's slang, you 'tard. wink

Who finds "idiot" or "cretin" offensive now?

B19GRR

1,980 posts

257 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Two mongs don't make a right!

I also called somebody a Joey earlier today. I guess I'm of a certain generation, spazzy yoof didn't get the reference, sigh.

On a vaguely more serious note, it's just language evolution, words come and go and original meanings are lost. It's pretty unlikely mong will ever be seen in a positive light but probably a good thing that it's become a more generalised insult rather than linked with Downs.

Cheers,
Rob

Ikemi

8,449 posts

206 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Snowboy said:
Trapddor backwards is rood park.
Actually, it's roddpark ... biggrin

captainzep

13,305 posts

193 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
The use of the word 'mong' isn't pleasant but then look at the evolution of language and our attitudes to lack of ability.

Loony, idiot, cretin, moron -all formal (if loose) clinical labels relating to mental health or learning disability.

In a sense, the specific word is fairly meaningless. Our penchant for judging people on the basis of their intelligence or ability is a more interesting discussion.

onyx39

11,128 posts

151 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Ikemi said:
Snowboy said:
Trapddor backwards is rood park.
Actually, it's roddpark ... biggrin
ACTUALLY, it's roddparT!

Yertis

18,073 posts

267 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
captainzep said:
Our penchant for judging people on the basis of their intelligence or ability is a more interesting discussion.
If you're going down that line you might as well say "our penchant for judging people", which isn't so much of penchant as a practical necessity in any structured society.

And therefore not very interesting. smile

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
That's a belm, not a mong...

irocfan

40,592 posts

191 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
That's a belm, not a mong...
it is a belm correct - however IIRC it has its roots in disability...

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
As others have said it' akin to Jew and gay, where the real meaning isn't meant to be offensive but now people use them as a mildly offensive insult with, in their eyes, no intended insult to the people who do represent the real meaning of the terms.
It is complex!
One lad I remember called them mongrels at school, teacher went a little red and sharply corrected him!

captainzep

13,305 posts

193 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
Yertis said:
captainzep said:
Our penchant for judging people on the basis of their intelligence or ability is a more interesting discussion.
If you're going down that line you might as well say "our penchant for judging people", which isn't so much of penchant as a practical necessity in any structured society.

And therefore not very interesting. smile
You mong.


-Oh I see. -I've just exercised practical necessity in a structured society.

Boring though.

Shaw Tarse

31,544 posts

204 months

Thursday 17th July 2014
quotequote all
irocfan said:
WinstonWolf said:
That's a belm, not a mong...
it is a belm correct - however IIRC it has its roots in disability...
From when I was at school it was due to Joey Deacon.