Conspiracy Theories for Cynics

[dudleybloke]

Some loons are saying Diana never died, she had plastic surgery to become David Furnish!

[Zod]

Laurel Green said:

Front bottom said:

A twist in the Diana saga.

I can't say it surprises me if true.


http://yournewswire.com/mi5-agent-killed-princess-...

Error 503 Backend fetch failed.

Front bottom's back end failed?

Given the content of the post, seems appropriate.

[Vaud]

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cac...

[Front bottom]

Vaud said:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cac...

Thank you. A much better link.

[Laurel Green]

Zod said:

Front bottom's back end failed?

Given the content of the post, seems appropriate.

[jshell]

Front bottom said:

A twist in the Diana saga.

I can't say it surprises me if true.


http://yournewswire.com/mi5-agent-killed-princess-...

Ha, mental old man tries to leave confusing legacy...

[Hainey]

I've not read the link but this whole conspiracy about the death of Diana mystifies me. She got in a car with a hammered driver who hit three figures in an underpass known to be an accident blind spot. That's it. Nothing more.

Many years ago when the details of what the driver Henri Paul had drunk hit the news I was in France with a mate who was also in the RN, so fair to say he could manage his drink as could I back then. We decided to do the 'Henri Paul challenge' and drink what he had done that evening.

Drive a car? We could just about walk and scratch our arses at the same time and that was it. Doing a ton up on a narrow highway in a barge of a mercedes certainly wasn't on the cards.

Piss head driver, dark, damp slippy roads, bargetastic motor, hugely excessive speed and no seatbeat. What part of that sounds like it will end well?

[Boring_Chris]

Hainey said:

I've not read the link but this whole conspiracy about the death of Diana mystifies me. She got in a car with a hammered driver who hit three figures in an underpass known to be an accident blind spot. That's it. Nothing more.

Many years ago when the details of what the driver Henri Paul had drunk hit the news I was in France with a mate who was also in the RN, so fair to say he could manage his drink as could I back then. We decided to do the 'Henri Paul challenge' and drink what he had done that evening.

Drive a car? We could just about walk and scratch our arses at the same time and that was it. Doing a ton up on a narrow highway in a barge of a mercedes certainly wasn't on the cards.

Piss head driver, dark, damp slippy roads, bargetastic motor, hugely excessive speed and no seatbeat. What part of that sounds like it will end well?

Asking the important question; how much had he drank?

[Hainey]

I cant remember now without resorting to google but it was a lot. Including some properly funky absinthe cocktails.

The guy was known to be a pisshead and was also on medication that you really should not mix with alcohol (obviously we couldn't replicate that part) but we were well away on it.

[Boring_Chris]

Jesus. I'd shy away from anything after absinthe, let alone driving a princess over a ton through a tunnel.

[Dan_1981]

Hainey said:

I cant remember now without resorting to google but it was a lot. Including some properly funky absinthe cocktails.

The guy was known to be a pisshead and was also on medication that you really should not mix with alcohol (obviously we couldn't replicate that part) but we were well away on it.

Oh come onnnnnnnn

Everyone knows his blood tests were doctored by MI7 (the really secret bunch)

[Hainey]

Dan_1981 said:

Hainey said:

I cant remember now without resorting to google but it was a lot. Including some properly funky absinthe cocktails.

The guy was known to be a pisshead and was also on medication that you really should not mix with alcohol (obviously we couldn't replicate that part) but we were well away on it.

Oh come onnnnnnnn

Everyone knows his blood tests were doctored by MI7 (the really secret bunch)

absolutely. They must be the men in tweed as our lot dont do black. Obviously they hypnotised the barmaid that served him orange juice all night to say she gave him the booze as well!

[scherzkeks]

StottyEvo said:

moanthebairns said:

StottyEvo said:

World Trade Center number 7 collapsing raised my eyebrows.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc

there was footage later released showing that it had fires on the lower floors.

also an explanation as to when the two towers came down the fountain structure was weakened resulting in the collapse of this building.

All really interesting stuff

I've seen the fires and read into it, it does seem odd that the building would implode in free fall as opposed to collapsing at the side where the fires are. I'm not saying it was a conspiracy, but out of every one that I've looked into this seems the most dubious.

The conspiracy theories are irrelevant. The evidence and science are another ball of wax.

Here is NIST being challenged on and revising their erroneous report on free-fall:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ii49BaRDp_A

In this context, once one learns about and understands what is required for a free-fall collapse, it is impossible to take the report seriously in its current form. The A&E site linked at the end of the video is excellent.

[Shuvi McTupya]

scherzkeks said:

The conspiracy theories are irrelevant. The evidence and science are another ball of wax.

Here is NIST being challenged on and revising their erroneous report on free-fall:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ii49BaRDp_A

In this context, once one learns about and understands what is required for a free-fall collapse, it is impossible to take the report seriously in its current form. The A&E site linked at the end of the video is excellent.

Also, our recent disaster in London is a reminder of just how badly WTC7 must have been built/designed if the 'official story' is to be believed.

[Shakermaker]

Shuvi McTupya said:

Also, our recent disaster in London is a reminder of just how badly WTC7 must have been built/designed if the 'official story' is to be believed.

Different construction methods use for the WTC than for Grenfell Tower, as US and UK standards for high-rise buildings are designed differently.

I have to err more towards the South Park explanation for 9/11, which is that the conspiracy theories are themselves the conspiracy theory, spread by the Government in order to keep the population in check who aren't controlled by normal means, since some people are so keen NOT to believe it was exactly as presented.

[foxbody-87]

Shuvi McTupya said:

Also, our recent disaster in London is a reminder of just how badly WTC7 must have been built/designed if the 'official story' is to be believed.

Grenfell Tower is 70 metres high whereas WTC7 was 226 metres tall, had an unusual construction, and in addition to extensive fire damage was struck by heavy debris. Hardly the same is it.

[Colonial]

Shuvi McTupya said:

Also, our recent disaster in London is a reminder of just how badly WTC7 must have been built/designed if the 'official story' is to be believed.

Your post is a reminder of just how little knowledge of different building methods there are.

[Shuvi McTupya]

Colonial said:

Your post is a reminder of just how little knowledge of different building methods there are.

I understand that there are different building methods.

I understand that the tower in London was not a steel frame construction like WTC7 was, but steel framed towers are not ussually prone to failure, in any circumstances.

There must have been an issue with that particular design for it to collapse to the ground, no?

[Colonial]

Yes. Because jet fuel and airline strikes are the most common methods pf yesting building stability.

So was it the government, Jews, the new world order or lizards?

[jmorgan]

foxbody-87 said:

Shuvi McTupya said:

Also, our recent disaster in London is a reminder of just how badly WTC7 must have been built/designed if the 'official story' is to be believed.

Grenfell Tower is 70 metres high whereas WTC7 was 226 metres tall, had an unusual construction, and in addition to extensive fire damage was struck by heavy debris. Hardly the same is it.

Yeah, but free fall innit.......


Come on, the CT nuts are never going to let it rest. They cannot and never ever will be able to prove their theory. Hang on, theory impli s some ability to understand what they are talking about. And before that bunch of AE for truth are dragged in (too late.... cognitive disavoance) they are are doing rather well for themselves. Work it out. If they knew what they were talking about it would not be a conspiracy.

The collapse is understood. The conspiracy nuts don't like it cos the gubbmint is guilty, stands to reason.