Facebook fails Vol. 2

[ChemicalChaos]

TheEnd said:

smiffy180 said:

Same difference, was fun to read at 3 in the morning after going to hospital for a false alarm with labour

Nightmares about the election?

Anyway, here's what happens when a classic car enthusiast has a very bad cold

[carreauchompeur]

Am I being unduly harsh? Found this photographer linked on a friends wall.

None of the pictures look any good, or is it just me?

https://www.facebook.com/ZMphotography1980

[Vaud]

Pretty poor but it's a free market and people can see here work before ordering so less of an FB fail, just a poor photographer?

[jurbie]

She's David Bailey compared to a lot of the crap out there and a lot of people will be happy to pay £300 for a fairly bland and unimaginative wedding shoot.

If you want to see truly awful then have a browse of this.

http://youarenotaphotographer.com/

[Bullett]

This popped up on my feed.

[aka_kerrly]

^ Jeeez that is embarrassing.

Actually not the first time that Kanye has needed help from a McCartney as "Muzik" samples a Wings track Old Siam.

[Type R Tom]

Every single moron who has posted this on their wall:

Better Safe than Sorry Right:
Channel 13 News was just talking about this change in Facebook Privacy Policy. As of January 5, 2015 at 1.23 pm Eastern standard time, I DO NOT give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, all past, present, and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law
(UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute). NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members MUST post a note like this. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in your profile status updates.
DO NOT SHARE. You MUST COPY & PASTE!
I have left this statement in my comments below. So it's easy for you to copy & paste..

I wouldn't mind but it is clearly using US wording, why do people fall for them?

[marshalla]

Type R Tom said:

Every single moron who has posted this on their wall:

Better Safe than Sorry Right:
Channel 13 News was just talking about this change in Facebook Privacy Policy. As of January 5, 2015 at 1.23 pm Eastern standard time, I DO NOT give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, all past, present, and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law
(UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute). NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members MUST post a note like this. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in your profile status updates.
DO NOT SHARE. You MUST COPY & PASTE!
I have left this statement in my comments below. So it's easy for you to copy & paste..

I wouldn't mind but it is clearly using US wording, why do people fall for them?

And they don't know the difference between tactically and tacitly. Nor do they realise that if the statement worked, they would be blocking everyone from accessing their profiles (which would not be a bad thing, IMNSHO).

[evo4a]

Not a fail, but worth a post up...........

[Burnham]

Ha, I like that last one

[Amirhussain]

[CoolC]

^^ Depends which way the wind's blowing surly.

[DamienB]

Ask her if she has light or heavy WiFi. You could keep that going for days.

[MysteryLemon]

Raddors said:

illmonkey said:

Raddors said:

Moonhawk said:

Dr Murdoch said:

Only a fool forgets the two second car rule

Just did some quick back of the postcard calculations.

60mph = 26.8 meters per second.

2 second rule means you should leave a minimum of around 54 meters between you and the next car.

The car in the image looks like a Toyota Aygo which is 3.4m long - so he should have been leaving almost 16 car lengths.

It's terrifying how many people are completely off the mark on this one. I was recently on a minibus refresher course for a charity I help at, the instructor asked how many car lengths is correct at 70mph in the dry. The answers ranged from 2 - 6 car lengths!

When I said about 20 car lengths a couple of people looked at my like I had just loudly st my pants sat in my chair!

Well had you?

Yes I had, but that's not the reason they looked round

Sorry to bring up an old post from the topic but just had a proper good chuckle to myself at work reading this. Well done

[Pesty]

. Internet fail and karma

Car dealers order pizza, they over pay , guy points it out they say keep it . Then they phone his boss and demand he comes back with 7 dollars.

Try to humiliate him and get him fired by releasing the video.



Check their reviews.
http://www.yelp.com/biz/f-and-r-auto-sales-westpor...

Facebook page set up for them https://www.facebook.com/FRAutoSale


Liveleak vid so adverts not safe for work

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=030_1421237536



Think they have had to shut down their Facebook page.

Edited by Pesty on Thursday 15th January 20:05

[ChemicalChaos]

I hope to god this person is not being serious

[Harrytsg]

ChemicalChaos said:

I hope to god this person is not being serious

It has 6 likes!!!!

[omgus]

Doctor on FB share their dumbest patient stories

We need to cull some of these people.

[carreauchompeur]

omgus said:

Doctor on FB share their dumbest patient stories

We need to cull some of these people.

They seem to be doing it pretty well by themselves.

[Hackney]

lufbramatt said:

Saw this on FB last night and wanted to have a rant but my wife banned me as it's someone she knows better than me.... how do people like this pass their driving test?

Massive logic fail- he insists he WAS leaving a "safe stopping distance" (2 car lengths at 60mph ) and it was all the other drivers fault yet clearly by virtue of the fact he rammed the back of the other car he definitely wasn't...

There were loads of replies but I've only left in the pertinent points:

There's someone that your wife knows better than she knows you? I'd be less concerned with his driving than his relationship with your wife tbh.