Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 3]

Things you always wanted to know the answer to [Vol. 3]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

ben5575

6,264 posts

221 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Alignment of electrons in bricks

I was talking to an archaeologist (not a detectorist... wink ) last week who was using a magnasomethingorother ('radar') to survey one of my sites. I asked what it could detect and she went through the various usual things but then mentioned bricks.

Bricks apparently show up very well because, 'of course', all of the electrons align to the north pole when the bricks are fired. I chuckled, agreeing 'of course'.

So can anybody enlighten me as to why this happens or alternatively confirm as I suspect that this is utter horse st/the archaeological equivalent of tartan paint?

GroundEffect

13,836 posts

156 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Speed 3 said:
singlecoil said:
Is there a theoretical limit to the top speed a propellor driven aircraft could achieve?
Effectively when the tip would go supersonic which will vary in rpm depending on the size of the prop. Same for helicopter blades.
Supersonic props exist...

Halmyre

11,195 posts

139 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
ben5575 said:
Alignment of electrons in bricks

I was talking to an archaeologist (not a detectorist... wink ) last week who was using a magnasomethingorother ('radar') to survey one of my sites. I asked what it could detect and she went through the various usual things but then mentioned bricks.

Bricks apparently show up very well because, 'of course', all of the electrons align to the north pole when the bricks are fired. I chuckled, agreeing 'of course'.

So can anybody enlighten me as to why this happens or alternatively confirm as I suspect that this is utter horse st/the archaeological equivalent of tartan paint?
Bricks are made of clay which contains minerals which align to a magnetic field when heated (paramagnetism?). So there is some truth to the tale.

Apropos of all that, did your chuckling acquiescence result in a, erm, result? wink

ben5575

6,264 posts

221 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Delightful as she was, perhaps more Tony Robinson than Harrison Ford....

Were I cleverer I would make some weak contextual joke about paramagnatism, but let's just say that there may have been some magic in the air whistle But then of course I am far more HF than TR so I can't blame her*...

Thanks for the answer.

*That may or may not be true...


hairykrishna

13,166 posts

203 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
GroundEffect said:
Speed 3 said:
singlecoil said:
Is there a theoretical limit to the top speed a propellor driven aircraft could achieve?
Effectively when the tip would go supersonic which will vary in rpm depending on the size of the prop. Same for helicopter blades.
Supersonic props exist...
Interesting question. NASA did a bunch of work in a supersonic wind tunnel on this question. Apparently they found propeller designs with reasonable efficiency even beyond mach 1. I'm not sure there is an upper limit.

Speed 3

4,565 posts

119 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Speed 3 said:
singlecoil said:
Is there a theoretical limit to the top speed a propellor driven aircraft could achieve?
Effectively when the tip would go supersonic which will vary in rpm depending on the size of the prop. Same for helicopter blades.
Sorry, misread you post, you said aircraft not the propeller itself. Similar limitations when you put in the 3rd dimension of airflow. I suspect the limiting factor is outright power when you consider most jet aircraft need afterburners to break through M1.0 and have pure jet rather than turbofan engines even with limited bypass.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Speed 3 said:
Sorry, misread you post, you said aircraft not the propeller itself. Similar limitations when you put in the 3rd dimension of airflow. I suspect the limiting factor is outright power when you consider most jet aircraft need afterburners to break through M1.0 and have pure jet rather than turbofan engines even with limited bypass.
Which current supersonic aircraft have turbojets? Admittedly most of them aren't expected to spend long at over mach 1 but all the ones I can think of have turbofans.

mko9

2,361 posts

212 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Speed 3 said:
Sorry, misread you post, you said aircraft not the propeller itself. Similar limitations when you put in the 3rd dimension of airflow. I suspect the limiting factor is outright power when you consider most jet aircraft need afterburners to break through M1.0 and have pure jet rather than turbofan engines even with limited bypass.
Which current supersonic aircraft have turbojets? Admittedly most of them aren't expected to spend long at over mach 1 but all the ones I can think of have turbofans.
Anything modern would be a turbofan, but older supersonic aircraft like F-4s, MiG-21s, MiG-23s, etc, etc have jet engines.

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

167 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
That stroppy bird will be along in a minute to shout at you all.

RammyMP

6,770 posts

153 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Since Monarch went bust, what's happened to their planes? I thought they were all leased, have the owners leased them out again or are they parked up somewhere? If they are parked, where do they leave them?

Cheers!

Vipers

32,883 posts

228 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Another intriguing question. My son is revising the Highway Code and asked me where the sign saying "No inflammables or explosives" would be displayed. I have never seen it, but googling found a picture taken in 2007, and is still on street maps.

It's in Wragby Road Lincoln outside the Peacock pub.

Notice the DYL's on the corner, are drivers that stupid there to park on corners biggrin


227bhp

10,203 posts

128 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Can the house spiders I throw out at this time of the year survive outside?

I have lots of spider questions....

mickk

28,864 posts

242 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
227bhp said:
Can the house spiders I throw out at this time of the year survive outside?

I have lots of spider questions....
Don't they just come straight back in?

1878

821 posts

163 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Another intriguing question. My son is revising the Highway Code and asked me where the sign saying "No inflammables or explosives" would be displayed. I have never seen it, but googling found a picture taken in 2007, and is still on street maps.

It's in Wragby Road Lincoln outside the Peacock pub.

Notice the DYL's on the corner, are drivers that stupid there to park on cornersbiggrin

Just take a trip to the bad parking thread if you really need an answer to that!
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

grumbledoak

31,532 posts

233 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
mickk said:
Don't they just come straight back in?
yes

The trick is to kick them to death first.

Halmyre

11,195 posts

139 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Another intriguing question. My son is revising the Highway Code and asked me where the sign saying "No inflammables or explosives" would be displayed. I have never seen it, but googling found a picture taken in 2007, and is still on street maps.

It's in Wragby Road Lincoln outside the Peacock pub.

Notice the DYL's on the corner, are drivers that stupid there to park on corners biggrin

I've only heard of it used on the approach to tunnels.

AstonZagato

12,703 posts

210 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
hairykrishna said:
GroundEffect said:
Speed 3 said:
singlecoil said:
Is there a theoretical limit to the top speed a propellor driven aircraft could achieve?
Effectively when the tip would go supersonic which will vary in rpm depending on the size of the prop. Same for helicopter blades.
Supersonic props exist...
Interesting question. NASA did a bunch of work in a supersonic wind tunnel on this question. Apparently they found propeller designs with reasonable efficiency even beyond mach 1. I'm not sure there is an upper limit.
Didn't some of the late WWII fighters approach Mach 1 (but not exceed it) in dives?

CoolC

4,216 posts

214 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
Vipers said:
Another intriguing question. My son is revising the Highway Code and asked me where the sign saying "No inflammables or explosives" would be displayed. I have never seen it, but googling found a picture taken in 2007, and is still on street maps.

It's in Wragby Road Lincoln outside the Peacock pub.

Notice the DYL's on the corner, are drivers that stupid there to park on corners biggrin

I've only heard of it used on the approach to tunnels.
My home city, (the Peacock does quite nice food actually)

There is a steep hill a few hundred metres further on if that is the reason.

LordJammy

3,112 posts

189 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
I drive through there every morning. Further down the road there’s a big hill with a sharpish S bend at the top. I always like to imagine a fuel tanker losing it and causing all sorts of spectacular carnage as it rolls off the side of the hill in an enormous ball of flame into the college below nuts

Vipers

32,883 posts

228 months

Monday 23rd October 2017
quotequote all
LordJammy said:
I drive through there every morning. Further down the road there’s a big hill with a sharpish S bend at the top. I always like to imagine a fuel tanker losing it and causing all sorts of spectacular carnage as it rolls off the side of the hill in an enormous ball of flame into the college below nuts
Interesting, could be.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED