High-class escorts.
Discussion
El stovey said:
Well yes, that's the point. They don't replace relationships. I am 100% certain though there will be many men that see prostitution as a substitute for non paid relationships.
I know a bloke who goes to escorts a lot. He doesn't bother with more traditional girl friends as he can't be bothered meeting them and going through the whole process of getting to know them and finding out if they'll let him do exotic stuff to them . He freely admits himself that seeing them so frequently has skewed his views on what a relationship is. He rationalises it much like many posters in here who say "all men pay for it " type comments.
there was a poster above who said that he feels to shy to talk to his wife about what turns him on.I know a bloke who goes to escorts a lot. He doesn't bother with more traditional girl friends as he can't be bothered meeting them and going through the whole process of getting to know them and finding out if they'll let him do exotic stuff to them . He freely admits himself that seeing them so frequently has skewed his views on what a relationship is. He rationalises it much like many posters in here who say "all men pay for it " type comments.
That seems like a recipe for disaster to me.
glenrobbo said:
Mr Roper said:
Telephone cord.
Cheese grater.
Nappies.
The list is endless.
Nappies??? Cheese grater.
Nappies.
The list is endless.
I mean, telephone cord & cheese grater, yeah, but nappies? Seriously?
Oh, and don't forget the rubber chicken and big bag of Brussels sprouts.
In the translation we studied one of the banned sexual positions was "lion on a cheese grater"
Every time I open the bottom drawer in our kitchen I am transported back to 1986, smirking.
El stovey said:
Well yes, that's the point. They don't replace relationships. I am 100% certain though there will be many men that see prostitution as a substitute for non paid relationships.
I know a bloke who goes to escorts a lot. He doesn't bother with more traditional girl friends as he can't be bothered meeting them and going through the whole process of getting to know them and finding out if they'll let him do exotic stuff to them . He freely admits himself that seeing them so frequently has skewed his views on what a relationship is. He rationalises it much like many posters in here who say "all men pay for it " type comments.
The majority of men seeing prostitutes are married or in a relationship. They would therefore appear to get something from the prostitute that they are not getting at home for free.I know a bloke who goes to escorts a lot. He doesn't bother with more traditional girl friends as he can't be bothered meeting them and going through the whole process of getting to know them and finding out if they'll let him do exotic stuff to them . He freely admits himself that seeing them so frequently has skewed his views on what a relationship is. He rationalises it much like many posters in here who say "all men pay for it " type comments.
I think it needs to be brought down to its base level. Which is the basic male drive to spread his seed as far and wide as possible. Doing so with prostitutes addresses the basic need but doesn't involve the complicated emotional consequences of a relationship.
Edited by PurpleMoonlight on Monday 9th January 15:40
PurpleMoonlight said:
I think it needs to be brought down to its base level. Which is the basic male drive to spread his seed as far and wide as possible. Doing so with prostitutes addresses the basic need but doesn't involve the complicated emotional consequences of a relationship.
I think a few of the posters on this thread aren't really interested in spreading their seed - that is the point and they visit the Pro to get their special requirements seen to.Mr Roper said:
Telephone cord.
Cheese grater.
Reminds me of when I was at law school. You could always tell if someone in the library was reading the leading case of R v Brown (on whether you can consent to being assaulted) from the expression (usually wincing) on their face...sandpaper, vices, hammer and nails...Cheese grater.
Europa1 said:
Mr Roper said:
Telephone cord.
Cheese grater.
Reminds me of when I was at law school. You could always tell if someone in the library was reading the leading case of R v Brown (on whether you can consent to being assaulted) from the expression (usually wincing) on their face...sandpaper, vices, hammer and nails...Cheese grater.
PurpleMoonlight said:
El stovey said:
Well yes, that's the point. They don't replace relationships. I am 100% certain though there will be many men that see prostitution as a substitute for non paid relationships.
I know a bloke who goes to escorts a lot. He doesn't bother with more traditional girl friends as he can't be bothered meeting them and going through the whole process of getting to know them and finding out if they'll let him do exotic stuff to them . He freely admits himself that seeing them so frequently has skewed his views on what a relationship is. He rationalises it much like many posters in here who say "all men pay for it " type comments.
The majority of men seeing prostitutes are married or in a relationship. They would therefore appear to get something from the prostitute that they are not getting at home for free.I know a bloke who goes to escorts a lot. He doesn't bother with more traditional girl friends as he can't be bothered meeting them and going through the whole process of getting to know them and finding out if they'll let him do exotic stuff to them . He freely admits himself that seeing them so frequently has skewed his views on what a relationship is. He rationalises it much like many posters in here who say "all men pay for it " type comments.
I think it needs to be brought down to its base level. Which is the basic male drive to spread his seed as far and wide as possible. Doing so with prostitutes addresses the basic need but doesn't involve the complicated emotional consequences of a relationship.
DonkeyApple said:
Europa1 said:
Mr Roper said:
Telephone cord.
Cheese grater.
Reminds me of when I was at law school. You could always tell if someone in the library was reading the leading case of R v Brown (on whether you can consent to being assaulted) from the expression (usually wincing) on their face...sandpaper, vices, hammer and nails...Cheese grater.
I suspect he was probably right
kowalski655 said:
DonkeyApple said:
Europa1 said:
Mr Roper said:
Telephone cord.
Cheese grater.
Reminds me of when I was at law school. You could always tell if someone in the library was reading the leading case of R v Brown (on whether you can consent to being assaulted) from the expression (usually wincing) on their face...sandpaper, vices, hammer and nails...Cheese grater.
I suspect he was probably right
Mr Gearchange said:
kowalski655 said:
DonkeyApple said:
Europa1 said:
Mr Roper said:
Telephone cord.
Cheese grater.
Reminds me of when I was at law school. You could always tell if someone in the library was reading the leading case of R v Brown (on whether you can consent to being assaulted) from the expression (usually wincing) on their face...sandpaper, vices, hammer and nails...Cheese grater.
I suspect he was probably right
Europa1 said:
Mr Gearchange said:
kowalski655 said:
DonkeyApple said:
Europa1 said:
Mr Roper said:
Telephone cord.
Cheese grater.
Reminds me of when I was at law school. You could always tell if someone in the library was reading the leading case of R v Brown (on whether you can consent to being assaulted) from the expression (usually wincing) on their face...sandpaper, vices, hammer and nails...Cheese grater.
I suspect he was probably right
Add in Cottingham and Another v Attey Bower and Jones and you have the case the spawned an entire industry of snake oil that many think are the antidote to over inflated claims of doom mongering which result when people fail to take reasonable care and has left many Property solicitors feeling like nailing someones balls to a wall...
Zod said:
Europa1 said:
Mr Gearchange said:
kowalski655 said:
DonkeyApple said:
Europa1 said:
Mr Roper said:
Telephone cord.
Cheese grater.
Reminds me of when I was at law school. You could always tell if someone in the library was reading the leading case of R v Brown (on whether you can consent to being assaulted) from the expression (usually wincing) on their face...sandpaper, vices, hammer and nails...Cheese grater.
I suspect he was probably right
Not interested in the sensationalist stuff, me
kowalski655 said:
My old law tutor said that's the only case most people remember...well that,and the bloody snail one
I suspect he was probably right
Oh no I remember the Bulger case all too clearly. I do also remember Donoghue v Stevenson (and the quote from Lord Atkin which I memorised for use in the exam)I suspect he was probably right
Europa1 said:
Reminds me of when I was at law school. You could always tell if someone in the library was reading the leading case of R v Brown (on whether you can consent to being assaulted) from the expression (usually wincing) on their face...sandpaper, vices, hammer and nails...
Were they the British Aerospace missile engineers from Hatfield or Stevenage?Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff