Lift buttons and jews

Lift buttons and jews

Author
Discussion

bristolracer

5,541 posts

149 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
The Plymouth brethren have some interesting ideas on the use of technology too. Not just on the sabbath either.

HTP99

22,556 posts

140 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
bristolracer said:
The Plymouth brethren have some interesting ideas on the use of technology too. Not just on the sabbath either.
I've sold cars to Plymouth Brethren, I had to have the radios removed, not disconnected but removed completely.

Just remembered my Uncle and Aunt, they are Strict Baptists, no TV as it's evil, doesn't stop my uncle being glued to it when he's round someone's house who has a TV, doesn't also stop him having a laptop and access to the internet.

He was a cruel and evil bd to his 5 daughters, used to beat them with a belt if they were out of line, all in the name of religion.

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

108 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
Is this an anti-Semitic thread or just religion bashing generally?

irocfan

40,470 posts

190 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
Nanook said:
No, it's not.

Persecuting gays, jailing women who have been raped for having sex outside marriage, killing those that believe in a different God to you, these things are not comparable to not pressing the lift button for someone, and suggesting that they are is easily the stupidest thing posted on this thread yet.
so where do you rate those well know religious types like Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot? And please do not give me that guff about Stalin was a failed priest etc - fact is he was a militant athiest by the point he started having any influence. Killing people because they believed in different stuff.

Face it - we humans are a bunch of aholes most of the time and really do not need religion (or lack thereof) to show that.

J4CKO

41,567 posts

200 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
SantaBarbara said:
Is this an anti-Semitic thread or just religion bashing generally?
Ah, so we arent allowed to discuss religion now ?

Look up the definition of Antisemitism, hatred or discrimination against Jews, i dont think discussing the slightly odd (to us) behavior around lift buttons on the Sabbath will qualify, i suspect most Jewish folk find that a bit odd or inconvenient as well.

And religion in general, I am entitled to bash it as a concept as much as someone is entitled to throw themselves into it, I think its all nonsense, feel free to convince me otherwise, maybe that is my deeply held conviction, I dont actively enforce it on others like most religious folk dont enforce their faith on others, the problems come when anyone tries to make anyone else do things their way. We are all entitled to an opinion, nothing more.

Mothersruin

8,573 posts

99 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
SantaBarbara said:
Is this an anti-Semitic thread or just religion bashing generally?
It's an anti-nonsense thread.

I mean, throwing your car keys and phone into a bush because it's nearly CrackerJack...

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

186 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
HTP99 said:
bristolracer said:
The Plymouth brethren have some interesting ideas on the use of technology too. Not just on the sabbath either.
I've sold cars to Plymouth Brethren, I had to have the radios removed, not disconnected but removed completely.

Just remembered my Uncle and Aunt, they are Strict Baptists, no TV as it's evil, doesn't stop my uncle being glued to it when he's round someone's house who has a TV, doesn't also stop him having a laptop and access to the internet.

He was a cruel and evil bd to his 5 daughters, used to beat them with a belt if they were out of line, all in the name of religion.
My (niche) industry is full of companies run by the Brethren.

They are an odd bunch to say the least. We took over a Brethren company 12 years ago and TUPE'd their non-Brethren staff. They had some tales to tell...

telecat

8,528 posts

241 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
irocfan said:
Nanook said:
No, it's not.

Persecuting gays, jailing women who have been raped for having sex outside marriage, killing those that believe in a different God to you, these things are not comparable to not pressing the lift button for someone, and suggesting that they are is easily the stupidest thing posted on this thread yet.
so where do you rate those well know religious types like Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot? And please do not give me that guff about Stalin was a failed priest etc - fact is he was a militant athiest by the point he started having any influence. Killing people because they believed in different stuff.

Face it - we humans are a bunch of aholes most of the time and really do not need religion (or lack thereof) to show that.
Essentially Religion and Power go together. Religion is used to gain power and control those who follow it. The same can be said for political power. The advent of the "information age" meant those in control though they could use it to gain more power. Where it is controlled they do. Where it is not they have lost a lot of their ability to push people where they want them to go.

moanthebairns

17,940 posts

198 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
I'm 50/50 on this.

The ahole in me would have ran my hands up and down every fking button going after getting off at my floor, flipped them the bird and told them that's what you get for being so fking stupid.

Then again, the Brit in me would probably have asked straight away, or apologised for not doing so and pushed the button without realising I was helping some weird fking cult.


SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

253 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
SantaBarbara said:
Some Roman Catholic regulations are equally strange and old fashioned.
Such as celibacy for priests.
Back when it wasn't ok to be gay, joining the priesthood was a very good excuse for not having a wife. And, probably, having a wimpy handshake.

Estimates of what proportion of priests were gay vary, but it nicely explains the virulent homophobia that runs through Catholicism.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
djc206 said:
jsf said:
How do they switch their pacemaker off on the Sabbath?

Does this mean if someone is dying and they need a medical device like a defrib to save a life they just let them die?
Anything that's life saving appears to be acceptable so at least that's sensible!
If that is true then that just illustrates the absurdity of it.

Some religions don't allow blood transfusions, even f that would save life. At least they are consistent. redface

djc206

12,353 posts

125 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
jsf said:
If that is true then that just illustrates the absurdity of it.

Some religions don't allow blood transfusions, even f that would save life. At least they are consistent. redface
Quite. The Jewish religion is mostly alien to me as I've not grown up or lived in an area with many Jewish people but I did grow up in a town with a lot of Jehovahs witnesses. Utter madness the whole transfusion thing.

moanthebairns

17,940 posts

198 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
jsf said:
djc206 said:
jsf said:
How do they switch their pacemaker off on the Sabbath?

Does this mean if someone is dying and they need a medical device like a defrib to save a life they just let them die?
Anything that's life saving appears to be acceptable so at least that's sensible!
If that is true then that just illustrates the absurdity of it.

Some religions don't allow blood transfusions, even f that would save life. At least they are consistent. redface
What you mean something created thousands of years ago that did not foresee technology being able to save a life or prolong it so didn't bother about creating set rules for this. But foreseen the afterlife. And how the earth was created.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
moanthebairns said:
What you mean something created thousands of years ago that did not foresee technology being able to save a life or prolong it so didn't bother about creating set rules for this. But foreseen the afterlife. And how the earth was created.
I have no idea what you are trying to say here?

moanthebairns

17,940 posts

198 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
jsf said:
moanthebairns said:
What you mean something created thousands of years ago that did not foresee technology being able to save a life or prolong it so didn't bother about creating set rules for this. But foreseen the afterlife. And how the earth was created.
I have no idea what you are trying to say here?
Well its all a bit st isn't it.

The sabbath is commanded by God and is supposed to be spent in rest thanking him for creating the earth as it was the day he rested as fair as I'm aware.

He comes up with a set of rules that they should and shouldn't do which was funnily enough applicable at the time.

They are fully versed in the creation of earth something that still troubles scientists, but at no point did God tell them or even have the foresight to put a paragraph in because in a thousand years a jew might need to ride in a life on a Saturday, or be on life support.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
nope, still don't understand what you are trying to say.

Read back that last sentence in particular, it's gibberish.

kowalski655

14,643 posts

143 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
I think its quite clear-a supposedly all knowing,all powerful god who made a universe in less than a week, had all his thoughts written down 2000 or more years ago, but was NOT able to mention to his followers that they will need to think about electricity,LEDs etc, in the future. Maybe put in a commandment about things to come, & how to deal with them, as an all knowing,all powerful god!

because it does seem very odd that aforementioned all knowing,all powerful god in his book only mentions things that would have been known to the bronze age authors...no bacteria, black holes,planets apart from those visible, no mention of China or America or Australia(no marsupials in the ark eh Noah, missed a few there old fella!), sod all beyond the middle east

Its almost as if the authors were merely....human!

Captain Smerc

3,021 posts

116 months

Tuesday 24th October 2017
quotequote all
Blasphemy nono

NDA

21,578 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th October 2017
quotequote all
kowalski655 said:
Its almost as if the authors were merely....human!
Heretic.

Stone him.

Mothersruin

8,573 posts

99 months

Wednesday 25th October 2017
quotequote all
NDA said:
kowalski655 said:
Its almost as if the authors were merely....human!
Heretic.

Stone him.